BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9140159)

  • 1. Forceps biopsy and brush cytology during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of biliary stenoses.
    Schoefl R; Haefner M; Wrba F; Pfeffel F; Stain C; Poetzi R; Gangl A
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 1997 Apr; 32(4):363-8. PubMed ID: 9140159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Brush cytology during ERCP for the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic malignancies.
    Ferrari Júnior AP; Lichtenstein DR; Slivka A; Chang C; Carr-Locke DL
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1994; 40(2 Pt 1):140-5. PubMed ID: 8013810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predictive factors for positive diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures by transpapillary brush cytology and forceps biopsy.
    Naitoh I; Nakazawa T; Kato A; Hayashi K; Miyabe K; Shimizu S; Kondo H; Nishi Y; Yoshida M; Umemura S; Hori Y; Kuno T; Takahashi S; Ohara H; Joh T
    J Dig Dis; 2016 Jan; 17(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 26717051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ERCP or EUS for tissue diagnosis of biliary strictures? A prospective comparative study.
    Rösch T; Hofrichter K; Frimberger E; Meining A; Born P; Weigert N; Allescher HD; Classen M; Barbur M; Schenck U; Werner M
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2004 Sep; 60(3):390-6. PubMed ID: 15332029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. EUS-guided FNA of proximal biliary strictures after negative ERCP brush cytology results.
    DeWitt J; Misra VL; Leblanc JK; McHenry L; Sherman S
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Sep; 64(3):325-33. PubMed ID: 16923477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective evaluation of brush cytology of biliary strictures during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
    Glasbrenner B; Ardan M; Boeck W; Preclik G; Möller P; Adler G
    Endoscopy; 1999 Nov; 31(9):712-7. PubMed ID: 10604612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endoscopic transpapillary brush cytology and forceps biopsy in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
    Weber A; von Weyhern C; Fend F; Schneider J; Neu B; Meining A; Weidenbach H; Schmid RM; Prinz C
    World J Gastroenterol; 2008 Feb; 14(7):1097-101. PubMed ID: 18286693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endoscopic retrograde forceps biopsy and brush cytology of biliary strictures: a prospective study.
    Pugliese V; Conio M; Nicolò G; Saccomanno S; Gatteschi B
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1995 Dec; 42(6):520-6. PubMed ID: 8674921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Triple-tissue sampling during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography increases the overall diagnostic sensitivity for cholangiocarcinoma.
    Lee SJ; Lee YS; Lee MG; Lee SH; Shin E; Hwang JH
    Gut Liver; 2014 Nov; 8(6):669-73. PubMed ID: 25368755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. EUS-FNA for suspected malignant biliary strictures after negative endoscopic transpapillary brush cytology and forceps biopsy.
    Ohshima Y; Yasuda I; Kawakami H; Kuwatani M; Mukai T; Iwashita T; Doi S; Nakashima M; Hirose Y; Asaka M; Moriwaki H
    J Gastroenterol; 2011 Jul; 46(7):921-8. PubMed ID: 21526370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How to improve the accuracy of diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures.
    Fogel EL; Sherman S
    Endoscopy; 1999 Nov; 31(9):758-60. PubMed ID: 10604622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endoscopic brush cytology from the biliary duct system is still valuable.
    Eiholm S; Thielsen P; Kromann-Andersen H
    Dan Med J; 2013 Jul; 60(7):A4656. PubMed ID: 23809967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combination of ERCP-Based Modalities Increases Diagnostic Yield for Biliary Strictures.
    Han S; Tatman P; Mehrotra S; Wani S; Attwell AR; Edmundowicz SA; Brauer BC; Wagh MS; Hammad HT; Shah RJ
    Dig Dis Sci; 2021 Apr; 66(4):1276-1284. PubMed ID: 32430658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Intraductal ultrasound in the pancreaticobiliary duct system].
    Menzel J; Domschke W; Konturek JW; Gillessen A; Foerster E
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1997 Jan; 122(3):41-9; discussion 50. PubMed ID: 9072463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biliary guidewire facilitates bile duct biopsy and endoscopic drainage.
    Higashizawa T; Tamada K; Tomiyama T; Wada S; Ohashi A; Satoh Y; Gotoh Y; Miyata T; Ido K; Sugano K
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2002 Mar; 17(3):332-6. PubMed ID: 11982705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Endoscopic transpapillary bile duct biopsy without sphincterotomy for diagnosing biliary strictures: a prospective comparative study with bile and brush cytology.
    Sugiyama M; Atomi Y; Wada N; Kuroda A; Muto T
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1996 Mar; 91(3):465-7. PubMed ID: 8633492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endoscopic cytology in biliary strictures. Personal experience.
    Geraci G; Pisello F; Arnone E; Modica G; Sciumè C
    G Chir; 2008 Oct; 29(10):403-6. PubMed ID: 18947461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the Diagnostic Performances of Same-session Endoscopic Ultrasound- and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography-guided Tissue Sampling for Suspected Biliary Strictures at Different Primary Tumor Sites.
    Yeo SJ; Cho CM; Jung MK; Seo AN; Bae HI
    Korean J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 73(4):213-218. PubMed ID: 31030458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional and cholangioscopy-guided sampling of indeterminate biliary lesions at the time of ERCP: a prospective, long-term follow-up study.
    Draganov PV; Chauhan S; Wagh MS; Gupte AR; Lin T; Hou W; Forsmark CE
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Feb; 75(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 22248602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy and complication rate of brush cytology from bile duct versus pancreatic duct.
    Vandervoort J; Soetikno RM; Montes H; Lichtenstein DR; Van Dam J; Ruymann FW; Cibas ES; Carr-Locke DL
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Mar; 49(3 Pt 1):322-7. PubMed ID: 10049415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.