These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1463 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9140462)

  • 1. FIFRA Subdivision F testing Guidelines: are these tests adequate to detect potential hormonal activity for crop protection chemicals? Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.
    Stevens JT; Tobia A; Lamb JC; Tellone C; O'Neal F
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1997 Apr; 50(5):415-31. PubMed ID: 9140462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adequacy of required regulatory hazard testing for the detection of potential hormonal activity of crop protection chemicals.
    Stevens JT; Gfeller W; Machemer L; Leist KH
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 1998; 1(1):59-79. PubMed ID: 9487093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pesticide registration in the United States: overview and new directions.
    Culleen LE
    Qual Assur; 1994 Sep; 3(3):291-9. PubMed ID: 7804650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Uncertainties for endocrine disrupters: our view on progress.
    Daston GP; Cook JC; Kavlock RJ
    Toxicol Sci; 2003 Aug; 74(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 12730617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of the dog as non-rodent test species in the safety testing schedule associated with the registration of crop and plant protection products (pesticides): present status.
    Box RJ; Spielmann H
    Arch Toxicol; 2005 Nov; 79(11):615-26. PubMed ID: 15940470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Regulatory oversight of biochemical pesticides by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: health effects considerations.
    McClintock JT; Kough JL; Sjoblad RD
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1994 Feb; 19(1):115-24. PubMed ID: 8159811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screening chemicals for thyroid-disrupting activity: A critical comparison of mammalian and amphibian models.
    Pickford DB
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2010 Nov; 40(10):845-92. PubMed ID: 20684730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. FIFRA-88, GLP, and QA: pesticide registration.
    Sterner RT; Fagerstone KA
    Qual Assur; 1997; 5(3):171-82. PubMed ID: 9509549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Economic benefits of using adaptive predictive models of reproductive toxicity in the context of a tiered testing program.
    Martin MT; Knudsen TB; Judson RS; Kavlock RJ; Dix DJ
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2012 Feb; 58(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 22239076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Toxicity assessment strategies, data requirements, and risk assessment approaches to derive health based guidance values for non-relevant metabolites of plant protection products.
    Dekant W; Melching-Kollmuss S; Kalberlah F
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Mar; 56(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 19883711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Final amended report on the safety assessment of Methylparaben, Ethylparaben, Propylparaben, Isopropylparaben, Butylparaben, Isobutylparaben, and Benzylparaben as used in cosmetic products.
    Int J Toxicol; 2008; 27 Suppl 4():1-82. PubMed ID: 19101832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Strengths and limitations of using repeat-dose toxicity studies to predict effects on fertility.
    Dent MP
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Aug; 48(3):241-58. PubMed ID: 17512650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Food Quality Protection Act: its impact on the pesticide industry.
    Wagner JM
    Qual Assur; 1997; 5(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 9670242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of the Delaney Clause in the EPA.
    Fenner-Crisp PA
    Exp Toxicol Pathol; 1996 Feb; 48(2-3):199-200. PubMed ID: 8672877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk assessment of endocrine active chemicals: identifying chemicals of regulatory concern.
    Bars R; Fegert I; Gross M; Lewis D; Weltje L; Weyers A; Wheeler JR; Galay-Burgos M
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Oct; 64(1):143-54. PubMed ID: 22735369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. NTP technical report on the toxicity studies of Dibutyl Phthalate (CAS No. 84-74-2) Administered in Feed to F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice.
    Marsman D
    Toxic Rep Ser; 1995 Apr; 30():1-G5. PubMed ID: 12209194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Environmental effect assessment for sexual endocrine-disrupting chemicals: Fish testing strategy.
    Knacker T; Boettcher M; Frische T; Rufli H; Stolzenberg HC; Teigeler M; Zok S; Braunbeck T; Schäfers C
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Oct; 6(4):653-62. PubMed ID: 20872646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Profiling the activity of environmental chemicals in prenatal developmental toxicity studies using the U.S. EPA's ToxRefDB.
    Knudsen TB; Martin MT; Kavlock RJ; Judson RS; Dix DJ; Singh AV
    Reprod Toxicol; 2009 Sep; 28(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 19446433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do current FIFRA testing guidelines protect infants and children? Lead as a case study. Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.
    Plunkett LM
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1999 Feb; 29(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 10051420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 74.