1695 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9140462)
1. FIFRA Subdivision F testing Guidelines: are these tests adequate to detect potential hormonal activity for crop protection chemicals? Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.
Stevens JT; Tobia A; Lamb JC; Tellone C; O'Neal F
J Toxicol Environ Health; 1997 Apr; 50(5):415-31. PubMed ID: 9140462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adequacy of required regulatory hazard testing for the detection of potential hormonal activity of crop protection chemicals.
Stevens JT; Gfeller W; Machemer L; Leist KH
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 1998; 1(1):59-79. PubMed ID: 9487093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pesticide registration in the United States: overview and new directions.
Culleen LE
Qual Assur; 1994 Sep; 3(3):291-9. PubMed ID: 7804650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Uncertainties for endocrine disrupters: our view on progress.
Daston GP; Cook JC; Kavlock RJ
Toxicol Sci; 2003 Aug; 74(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 12730617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of the dog as non-rodent test species in the safety testing schedule associated with the registration of crop and plant protection products (pesticides): present status.
Box RJ; Spielmann H
Arch Toxicol; 2005 Nov; 79(11):615-26. PubMed ID: 15940470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Regulatory oversight of biochemical pesticides by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: health effects considerations.
McClintock JT; Kough JL; Sjoblad RD
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1994 Feb; 19(1):115-24. PubMed ID: 8159811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening chemicals for thyroid-disrupting activity: A critical comparison of mammalian and amphibian models.
Pickford DB
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2010 Nov; 40(10):845-92. PubMed ID: 20684730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. FIFRA-88, GLP, and QA: pesticide registration.
Sterner RT; Fagerstone KA
Qual Assur; 1997; 5(3):171-82. PubMed ID: 9509549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Economic benefits of using adaptive predictive models of reproductive toxicity in the context of a tiered testing program.
Martin MT; Knudsen TB; Judson RS; Kavlock RJ; Dix DJ
Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2012 Feb; 58(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 22239076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Toxicity assessment strategies, data requirements, and risk assessment approaches to derive health based guidance values for non-relevant metabolites of plant protection products.
Dekant W; Melching-Kollmuss S; Kalberlah F
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Mar; 56(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 19883711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Final amended report on the safety assessment of Methylparaben, Ethylparaben, Propylparaben, Isopropylparaben, Butylparaben, Isobutylparaben, and Benzylparaben as used in cosmetic products.
Int J Toxicol; 2008; 27 Suppl 4():1-82. PubMed ID: 19101832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Strengths and limitations of using repeat-dose toxicity studies to predict effects on fertility.
Dent MP
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Aug; 48(3):241-58. PubMed ID: 17512650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Food Quality Protection Act: its impact on the pesticide industry.
Wagner JM
Qual Assur; 1997; 5(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 9670242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of the Delaney Clause in the EPA.
Fenner-Crisp PA
Exp Toxicol Pathol; 1996 Feb; 48(2-3):199-200. PubMed ID: 8672877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk assessment of endocrine active chemicals: identifying chemicals of regulatory concern.
Bars R; Fegert I; Gross M; Lewis D; Weltje L; Weyers A; Wheeler JR; Galay-Burgos M
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Oct; 64(1):143-54. PubMed ID: 22735369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. NTP technical report on the toxicity studies of Dibutyl Phthalate (CAS No. 84-74-2) Administered in Feed to F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice.
Marsman D
Toxic Rep Ser; 1995 Apr; 30():1-G5. PubMed ID: 12209194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Environmental effect assessment for sexual endocrine-disrupting chemicals: Fish testing strategy.
Knacker T; Boettcher M; Frische T; Rufli H; Stolzenberg HC; Teigeler M; Zok S; Braunbeck T; Schäfers C
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Oct; 6(4):653-62. PubMed ID: 20872646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Profiling the activity of environmental chemicals in prenatal developmental toxicity studies using the U.S. EPA's ToxRefDB.
Knudsen TB; Martin MT; Kavlock RJ; Judson RS; Dix DJ; Singh AV
Reprod Toxicol; 2009 Sep; 28(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 19446433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do current FIFRA testing guidelines protect infants and children? Lead as a case study. Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.
Plunkett LM
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1999 Feb; 29(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 10051420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
