These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 914131)
1. [The physician's right to silence]. Hauffe R Fortschr Med; 1977 Sep; 95(25):2111-2. PubMed ID: 914131 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Confidentiality and the "dangerous" patient: implications of Tarasoff for psychiatrists and lawyers. Merton V Emory Law J; 1982; 31(2):263-343. PubMed ID: 11653483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [The medical forensic witness as an expert in criminal procedures]. Hübner M Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1989; 83(23):1199-201. PubMed ID: 2629346 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Therapeutic issues associated with confidentiality and informed consent in forensic evaluations. Yates KF N Engl J Crim Civ Confin; 1994; 20(2):345-68. PubMed ID: 11659983 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Keeping up with your legal responsibilities. Kelly LY Nursing; 1976 Mar; 6(3):81, 83, 85-7 passim. PubMed ID: 1044010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Modern status of views as to general measure of physician's duty to inform patient of risks of proposed treatment. Frantz LB Am Law Rep ALR 3rd Cases Annot; 1978; 88():1008-44. PubMed ID: 12091933 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethics in medicine and law--standards and conflicts. Norton ML Med Trial Tech Q; 1980; 26(4):377-94. PubMed ID: 7402006 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethics in medicine and law--standards and conflicts. Norton ML Scapel Quill; 1977 Sep; 11(3):1-20. PubMed ID: 11662516 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Torts--doctor-patient relationship--physician's breach of confidentiality gives rise to patient's action for damages. Cohn JC Cumberland Samford Law Rev; 1974; 5(1):169-74. PubMed ID: 11661117 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Informed consent, confidentiality and privilege in psychiatry: practical applications. Sadoff RL Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1974 Jun; 2(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 4451735 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Medical malpractice: the right to be informed. Kessenick LW; Mankin PA Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1973; 8(2):261-81. PubMed ID: 11664405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Extent of the physician's right to withhold testimony]. Rieger HJ Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1985 Aug; 110(34):1307-8. PubMed ID: 4028981 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A new standard for informed consent in medical malpractice cases--the role of the expert witness. Kopis WF St Louis Univ Law J; 1973; 18(2):256-69. PubMed ID: 11664280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The decline of "informed consent". Plant ML Wash Lee Law Rev; 1978; 35(1):91-105. PubMed ID: 11665008 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Informed consent: a new standard for Texas. Dalrymple G St Marys Law J; 1976; 8(3):499-513. PubMed ID: 11664790 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [The physician's right to refuse evidence]. Hinderer H Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1972 Jun; 66(11):579-80. PubMed ID: 5072119 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Direct and cross-examination of plaintiff expert witness (an orthopedist) in a case involving traumatic amputation of portion of finger, reimplantation, gangrene, informed consent. Part II. Trinley TL Med Trial Tech Q; 1975; 21(3):355-76. PubMed ID: 1123983 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Survey of Washington law: informed consent needed for medical treatment. Gonzaga Law Rev; 1974; 10(1):204-10. PubMed ID: 11664423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]