These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9141738)

  • 1. Differential effectiveness of telephone prompts by medical and nonmedical staff in increasing survey response rates: a randomised trial.
    Gupta L; Ward J; D'Este C
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 1997 Feb; 21(1):98-9. PubMed ID: 9141738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness of telephone prompts when surveying general practitioners: a randomised trial.
    Osborn M; Ward J; Boyle C
    Aust Fam Physician; 1996 Jan; Suppl 1():S41-3. PubMed ID: 9479799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Labour-saving strategies to maintain survey response rates: a randomised trial.
    Ward J; Bruce T; Holt P; D'Este K; Sladden M
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 1998; 22(3 Suppl):394-6. PubMed ID: 9629829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increasing response rates of gynaecologists to a survey: a randomised trial of telephone prompts.
    Ward J; Wain G
    Aust J Public Health; 1994 Sep; 18(3):332-4. PubMed ID: 7841265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maximizing response rates to a survey of dentists: a randomized trial.
    Rikard-Bell G; Ward J
    Aust Dent J; 2000 Mar; 45(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 10846272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of advance telephone prompting in a survey of general dental practitioners in scotland: a randomised controlled trial.
    Ho-A-Yun J; Crawford F; Newton J; Clarkson J
    Community Dent Health; 2007 Dec; 24(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 18246841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maximising response rates in a survey of general practitioners. Lessons from a Victorian survey on sexually transmissible diseases.
    Temple-Smith M; Mulvey G; Doyle W
    Aust Fam Physician; 1998 Jan; 27 Suppl 1():S15-8. PubMed ID: 9503730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey.
    McHorney CA; Kosinski M; Ware JE
    Med Care; 1994 Jun; 32(6):551-67. PubMed ID: 8189774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Increasing response rates in telephone surveys: a randomized trial.
    Smith W; Chey T; Jalaludin B; Salkeld G; Capon T
    J Public Health Med; 1995 Mar; 17(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 7786565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An advance letter did not increase the response rates in a telephone survey: a randomized trial.
    Carey RN; Reid A; Driscoll TR; Glass DC; Benke G; Fritschi L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Dec; 66(12):1417-21. PubMed ID: 23735264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Telephone reminders are a cost effective way to improve responses in postal health surveys.
    Salim Silva M; Smith WT; Bammer G
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2002 Feb; 56(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 11812810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating telephone follow-up of a mail survey of community pharmacies.
    Westrick SC; Mount JK
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2007 Jun; 3(2):160-82. PubMed ID: 17561218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Telephone follow-up was more expensive but more efficient than postal in a national stroke registry.
    Lannin NA; Anderson C; Lim J; Paice K; Price C; Faux S; Levi C; Donnan G; Cadilhac D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8):896-902. PubMed ID: 23810029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recruiting survey respondents to mailed surveys: controlled trials of incentives and prompts.
    Spry VM; Hovell MF; Sallis JG; Hofsteter CR; Elder JP; Molgaard CA
    Am J Epidemiol; 1989 Jul; 130(1):166-72. PubMed ID: 2741903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response rates of Victorian general practitioners to a mailed survey on miscarriage: randomised trial of a prize and two forms of introduction to the research.
    McLaren B; Shelley J
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2000 Aug; 24(4):360-4. PubMed ID: 11011459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Safety and effectiveness of nurse telephone consultation in out of hours primary care: randomised controlled trial. The South Wiltshire Out of Hours Project (SWOOP) Group.
    Lattimer V; George S; Thompson F; Thomas E; Mullee M; Turnbull J; Smith H; Moore M; Bond H; Glasper A
    BMJ; 1998 Oct; 317(7165):1054-9. PubMed ID: 9774295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pilot study of methods for assessing unmet secondary health care need in New Zealand.
    Bagshaw P; Bagshaw S; Frampton C; Gauld R; Green T; Harris C; Hornblow A; Hudson B; Raymont A; Richardson A; Shaw C; Toop L
    N Z Med J; 2017 Mar; 130(1452):23-38. PubMed ID: 28337038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An examination of self- and telephone-administered modes of administration for the Australian SF-36.
    Perkins JJ; Sanson-Fisher RW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1998 Nov; 51(11):969-73. PubMed ID: 9817114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relative costs and benefits of telephone interviews versus self-administered diaries for daily data collection.
    Hoppe MJ; Gillmore MR; Valadez DL; Civic D; Hartway J; Morrison DM
    Eval Rev; 2000 Feb; 24(1):102-16. PubMed ID: 10747768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Telephone versus postal surveys of general practitioners: methodological considerations.
    Sibbald B; Addington-Hall J; Brenneman D; Freeling P
    Br J Gen Pract; 1994 Jul; 44(384):297-300. PubMed ID: 8068375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.