These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9145266)

  • 1. pH measurements during lactic acid stinging test in normal and sensitive skin.
    Issachar N; Gall Y; Borell MT; Poelman MC
    Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Mar; 36(3):152-5. PubMed ID: 9145266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Baseline biophysical parameters in subjects with sensitive skin.
    Seidenari S; Francomano M; Mantovani L
    Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Jun; 38(6):311-5. PubMed ID: 9687028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Skin sensitivity evaluation: What could impact the assessment results?
    Ye C; Chen J; Yang S; Yi J; Chen H; Li M; Yin S; Lai W; Zheng Y
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2020 May; 19(5):1231-1238. PubMed ID: 31498557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitive skin: an overview.
    Inamadar AC; Palit A
    Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2013; 79(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 23254724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new tool to test active ingredient using lactic acid in vitro, a help to understand cellular mechanism involved in stinging test: An example using a bacterial polysaccharide (Fucogel
    Sakka M; Leschiera R; Le Gall-Ianotto C; Gouin O; L'herondelle K; Buscaglia P; Mignen O; Philbé JL; Saguet T; Carré JL; Misery L; Lebonvallet N
    Exp Dermatol; 2018 Mar; 27(3):238-244. PubMed ID: 29280518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors defining sensitive skin and its treatment.
    Muizzuddin N; Marenus KD; Maes DH
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Sep; 9(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 9744910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Functional map and age-related differences in the human face: nonimmunologic contact urticaria induced by hexyl nicotinate.
    Marrakchi S; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Jul; 55(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 16842548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predisposition to sensitive skin and atopic eczema.
    Cork MJ; Robinson D; Vasilopoulos Y; Ferguson A; Moustafa M; Mac Gowan A; Ward SJ; Tazi-Ahnini R
    Community Pract; 2005 Dec; 78(12):440-2. PubMed ID: 16375050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison and correlation between stinging responses to lactic acid and bioengineering parameters.
    An S; Lee E; Kim S; Nam G; Lee H; Moon S; Chang I
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Sep; 57(3):158-62. PubMed ID: 17680863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Skin microbiome in sensitive skin: The decrease of Staphylococcus epidermidis seems to be related to female lactic acid sting test sensitive skin.
    Zheng Y; Liang H; Li Z; Tang M; Song L
    J Dermatol Sci; 2020 Mar; 97(3):225-228. PubMed ID: 32156526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrical impedance index in human skin: measurements after occlusion, in 5 anatomical regions and in mild irritant contact dermatitis.
    Emtestam L; Ollmar S
    Contact Dermatitis; 1993 Feb; 28(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 8458202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensory, clinical and physiological factors in sensitive skin: a review.
    Farage MA; Katsarou A; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Jul; 55(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 16842547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acute irritant threshold correlates with barrier function, skin hydration and contact hypersensitivity in atopic dermatitis and rosacea.
    Darlenski R; Kazandjieva J; Tsankov N; Fluhr JW
    Exp Dermatol; 2013 Nov; 22(11):752-3. PubMed ID: 24112695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Facial variations in sensory responses.
    Marriott M; Whittle E; Basketter DA
    Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Nov; 49(5):227-31. PubMed ID: 14996043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiple parameter assessment of vulvar irritant contact dermatitis.
    Elsner P; Wilhelm D; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 1990 Jul; 23(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 2205447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is there any barrier impairment in sensitive skin?: a quantitative analysis of sensitive skin by mathematical modeling of transepidermal water loss desorption curves.
    Pinto P; Rosado C; Parreirão C; Rodrigues LM
    Skin Res Technol; 2011 May; 17(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 21251084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of a secondary prevention protocol for occupational contact dermatitis.
    Mauro M; De Giusti V; Bovenzi M; Larese Filon F
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2017 Apr; 31(4):656-663. PubMed ID: 27558199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanisms of subjective (sensory) irritation. Propensity to non-immunologic contact urticaria and objective irritation in stingers.
    Lammintausta K; Maibach HI; Wilson D
    Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1988; 36(2):45-9. PubMed ID: 3383754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new discussion of the cutaneous vascular reactivity in sensitive skin: A sub-group of SS?
    Chen SY; Yin J; Wang XM; Liu YQ; Gao YR; Liu XP
    Skin Res Technol; 2018 Aug; 24(3):432-439. PubMed ID: 29396896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biophysical parameters of skin: map of human face, regional, and age-related differences.
    Marrakchi S; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Jul; 57(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 17577354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.