These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 914527)

  • 1. Test sequences in screening for breast cancer.
    Siu TO; Hancock JR
    Health Serv Res; 1977; 12(3):250-68. PubMed ID: 914527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Search for effective means in the early detection of breast cancer].
    Pavlov KA; Semiglazov VF; Chernomordikova MF
    Vopr Onkol; 1981; 27(8):26-9. PubMed ID: 7281589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The abnormal mammogram in women with clinically normal breasts.
    Sterns EE
    Can J Surg; 1995 Apr; 38(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 7728672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identification and screening of women at high risk of breast cancer.
    Krischer JP; Cook B; Weiner RS
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1988; 13(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 3224347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Late-stage breast cancer among women with recent negative screening mammography: do clinical encounters offer opportunity for earlier detection?
    Mouchawar J; Taplin S; Ichikawa L; Barlow WE; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Gilbert J; Manos MM; Ulcickas Yood M
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):39-46. PubMed ID: 16287884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The value of risk factors in screening for breast cancer.
    Stark AM
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 1985 Jun; 11(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 4007172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Programs for the detection of gynecologic cancer].
    Alonso de Miguel M
    Rev Esp Oncol; 1984; 31(3):465-76. PubMed ID: 6546175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The abnormal mammogram in clinically normal breasts: a challenge for surgeons.
    Deschênes L
    Can J Surg; 1995 Apr; 38(2):110-1. PubMed ID: 7728662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The contribution of clinical breast examination to the accuracy of breast screening.
    Chiarelli AM; Majpruz V; Brown P; Thériault M; Shumak R; Mai V
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(18):1236-43. PubMed ID: 19720967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Survival rates for breast cancers detected in a community service screening mammogram program.
    Sener SF; Winchester DJ; Winchester DP; Barrera E; Bilimoria M; Brinkmann E; Alwawi E; Rabbitt S; Schermerhorn M; Du H
    Am J Surg; 2006 Mar; 191(3):406-9. PubMed ID: 16490556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of a mailed intervention on annual mammography and physician breast examinations among women at high risk of breast cancer.
    Richardson JL; Mondrus GT; Danley K; Deapen D; Mack T
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jan; 5(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 8770470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Population screening for breast cancer by mammography in The Netherlands. Expectations, early results, negative effects and conditions for large-scale screening.
    Hendriks JH; Verbeek AL
    Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1985; 54(3-4):186-91. PubMed ID: 3896616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of benign breast biopsy on subsequent breast cancer detection practices.
    Benedict S; Williams RD; Baron PL
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 1994 Oct; 21(9):1467-75. PubMed ID: 7816674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality.
    Shapiro S; Venet W; Strax P; Venet L; Roeser R
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1982 Aug; 69(2):349-55. PubMed ID: 6955542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Lehman CD; Blume JD; Weatherall P; Thickman D; Hylton N; Warner E; Pisano E; Schnitt SJ; Gatsonis C; Schnall M; DeAngelis GA; Stomper P; Rosen EL; O'Loughlin M; Harms S; Bluemke DA;
    Cancer; 2005 May; 103(9):1898-905. PubMed ID: 15800894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Mass screening for breast cancer--the results for 15 years].
    Ueda N; Nakano Y; Fujita M; Fujiwara A; Horino T; Usugane M; Ota J; Kumanishi Y; Tsukahara Y; Kimoto Y
    Gan No Rinsho; 1985 Nov; 31(14):1781-6. PubMed ID: 4087383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The value of plate thermography in the diagnosis of the breast (author's transl)].
    Mühlberger G; Lauth G; Kalbfleisch H
    MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1974 Nov; 116(47):2047-54. PubMed ID: 4374659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Secondary prevention: screening for breast cancer.
    Chamberlain J
    Eff Health Care; 1985; 2(5):179-88. PubMed ID: 10271344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breast fine needle aspiration cytology. Utility as a screening tool for clinically palpable lesions.
    Costa MJ; Tadros T; Hilton G; Birdsong G
    Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(4):461-71. PubMed ID: 8328240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.