These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9145556)

  • 41. Improving pain management in an acute care setting. The Crawford Long Hospital of Emory University experience.
    Carey SJ; Turpin C; Smith J; Whatley J; Haddox D
    Orthop Nurs; 1997; 16(4):29-36. PubMed ID: 9287814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of different pain scoring systems in critically ill patients in a general ICU.
    Ahlers SJ; van Gulik L; van der Veen AM; van Dongen HP; Bruins P; Belitser SV; de Boer A; Tibboel D; Knibbe CA
    Crit Care; 2008; 12(1):R15. PubMed ID: 18279522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Postoperative pain intensity assessment: a comparison of four scales in Chinese adults.
    Li L; Liu X; Herr K
    Pain Med; 2007 Apr; 8(3):223-34. PubMed ID: 17371409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of numerical and verbal rating scales to measure pain exacerbations in patients with chronic cancer pain.
    Brunelli C; Zecca E; Martini C; Campa T; Fagnoni E; Bagnasco M; Lanata L; Caraceni A
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2010 Apr; 8():42. PubMed ID: 20412579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Two methods of assessing pain intensity in English-speaking and Spanish-speaking emergency department patients.
    Puntillo KA; Neighbor ML
    J Emerg Nurs; 1997 Dec; 23(6):597-601. PubMed ID: 9460399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Measurement and monitoring of nausea severity in emergency department patients: a comparison of scales and exploration of treatment efficacy outcome measures.
    Meek R; Egerton-Warburton D; Mee MJ; Braitberg G
    Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jun; 22(6):685-93. PubMed ID: 25996342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Defining numerical cut points for mild, moderate, and severe pain in adult burn survivors: A northwest regional burn model system investigation.
    Carrougher GJ; Bamer AM; Mason S; Stewart BT; Gibran NS
    Burns; 2023 Mar; 49(2):310-316. PubMed ID: 36566097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Reliability of Visual Analog Scale and Numeric Rating Scale for the Assessment of Disease Activity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.
    Elera-Fitzcarrald C; Vega K; Gamboa-Cárdenas RV; Zúñiga K; Zevallos F; Reátegui-Sokolova C; Pastor-Asurza C; Perich-Campos R; Rodríguez Bellido Z; Aranow C; Alarcón GS; Calvo A; Ugarte-Gil MF
    J Clin Rheumatol; 2020 Oct; 26(7S Suppl 2):S170-S173. PubMed ID: 31899713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Pain intensity assessment: a comparison of selected pain intensity scales for use in cognitively intact and cognitively impaired African American older adults.
    Taylor LJ; Herr K
    Pain Manag Nurs; 2003 Jun; 4(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 12836153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The Visual Analogue Scale Versus Numerical Rating Scale in Measuring Pain Severity and Predicting Disability in Low Back Pain.
    Shafshak TS; Elnemr R
    J Clin Rheumatol; 2021 Oct; 27(7):282-285. PubMed ID: 31985722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review.
    Hjermstad MJ; Fayers PM; Haugen DF; Caraceni A; Hanks GW; Loge JH; Fainsinger R; Aass N; Kaasa S;
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2011 Jun; 41(6):1073-93. PubMed ID: 21621130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The Utility and Construct Validity of Four Measures of Pain Intensity: Results from a University-Based Study in Spain.
    Jensen MP; Castarlenas E; Roy R; Tomé Pires C; Racine M; Pathak A; Miró J
    Pain Med; 2019 Dec; 20(12):2411-2420. PubMed ID: 30877801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Reliability and validity of the Faces and Word Descriptor Scales to measure procedural pain.
    Keck JF; Gerkensmeyer JE; Joyce BA; Schade JG
    J Pediatr Nurs; 1996 Dec; 11(6):368-74. PubMed ID: 8991337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. How Should We Assess Pain: Do Patients Prefer a Quantitative or Qualitative Scale? A Study of Patient Preferences.
    Firdous S; Berger A; Jehangir W; Fernandez C; Behm B; Mehta ZY; Reddy A; Davis M
    Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2021 Apr; 38(4):383-390. PubMed ID: 32720804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Pain is not systematically registered in Dutch medical oncology outpatients.
    te Boveldt ND; Vernooij-Dassen MJ; Jansen A; Vissers KC; Engels Y
    Pain Pract; 2015 Apr; 15(4):364-70. PubMed ID: 24571565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of a digital version of the visual analog scale.
    Sindhu BS; Shechtman O; Tuckey L
    J Hand Ther; 2011; 24(4):356-63; quiz 364. PubMed ID: 21820864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Validity and reliability of Italian version of the Non-Communicating Children's Pain Checklist: revised version.
    Murgia M; Izzo R; Bettinelli A; Di Maggio C; De Angelis M; Mangone M; Paoloni M; Bernetti A; Torquati A; Leuzzi V; Santilli V
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2019 Feb; 55(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 30160437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Does the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) represent the optimal tool for evaluating pain in the triage process of patients presenting to the ED? Results of a muticenter study.
    Capponi R; Loguercio V; Guerrini S; Beltrami G; Vesprini A; Giostra F
    Acta Biomed; 2016 Jan; 87(3):347-352. PubMed ID: 28112706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Accurately measuring the quality and effectiveness of cervical spine surgery in registry efforts: determining the most valid and responsive instruments.
    Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2015 Jun; 15(6):1203-9. PubMed ID: 24076442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP).
    Hawker GA; Mian S; Kendzerska T; French M
    Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken); 2011 Nov; 63 Suppl 11():S240-52. PubMed ID: 22588748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.