These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9146482)

  • 1. A comparison of the repetitive click and conditioning-testing P50 paradigms.
    Cardenas VA; McCallin K; Hopkins R; Fein G
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1997 Mar; 104(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 9146482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The auditory P50 response is normal in Alzheimer's disease when measured via a paired click paradigm.
    Fein G; Biggins C; van Dyke C
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Nov; 92(6):536-45. PubMed ID: 7527772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of midlatency auditory sensory gating at short and long interstimulus intervals.
    Rentzsch J; de Castro AG; Neuhaus A; Jockers-Scherübl MC; Gallinat J
    Neuropsychobiology; 2008; 58(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 18781086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of the different interpair intervals in the conditioning-testing P50 paradigms.
    Dolu N; Süer C; Ozesmi C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2001 Jul; 41(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 11448508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Within-session changes in sensory gating assessed by P50 evoked potentials in normal subjects.
    Lamberti JS; Schwarzkopf SB; Boutros N; Crilly JF; Martin R
    Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 1993 Sep; 17(5):781-91. PubMed ID: 8255986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The development of P50 suppression in the auditory event-related potential.
    Marshall PJ; Bar-Haim Y; Fox NA
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2004 Jan; 51(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 14693363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dopaminergic modulation of the P50 auditory-evoked potential in a computer model of the CA3 region of the hippocampus: its relationship to sensory gating in schizophrenia.
    Moxon KA; Gerhardt GA; Adler LE
    Biol Cybern; 2003 Apr; 88(4):265-75. PubMed ID: 12690485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The midlatency auditory evoked potential P50 is abnormal in Huntington's disease.
    Uc EY; Skinner RD; Rodnitzky RL; Garcia-Rill E
    J Neurol Sci; 2003 Aug; 212(1-2):1-5. PubMed ID: 12809992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of P50 paired-click methodologies.
    Dalecki A; Croft RJ; Johnstone SJ
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Dec; 48(12):1692-700. PubMed ID: 21950767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reduced P50 auditory gating response in psychiatrically normal chronic marihuana users: a pilot study.
    Patrick G; Straumanis JJ; Struve FA; Fitz-Gerald MJ; Leavitt J; Manno JE
    Biol Psychiatry; 1999 May; 45(10):1307-12. PubMed ID: 10349037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gender differences in gating of the auditory evoked potential in normal subjects.
    Hetrick WP; Sandman CA; Bunney WE; Jin Y; Potkin SG; White MH
    Biol Psychiatry; 1996 Jan; 39(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 8719126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural correlates of sensory gating in the rat: decreased Fos induction in the lateral septum.
    van Luijtelaar G; Fabene PF; de Bruin N; Jongema C; Ellenbroek BA; Veening JG
    Brain Res Bull; 2001 Jan; 54(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 11275403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cocaine abusers have reduced auditory P50 amplitude and suppression compared to both normal controls and alcoholics.
    Fein G; Biggins C; MacKay S
    Biol Psychiatry; 1996 Jun; 39(11):955-65. PubMed ID: 9162208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory P50 obtained with a repetitive stimulus paradigm shows suppression to high-intensity tones.
    Ninomiya H; Sato E; Onitsuka T; Hayashida T; Tashiro N
    Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2000 Aug; 54(4):493-7. PubMed ID: 10997868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. P50 suppression is not affected by attentional manipulations.
    Jerger K; Biggins C; Fein G
    Biol Psychiatry; 1992 Feb; 31(4):365-77. PubMed ID: 1558899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensory gating of auditory evoked potentials in rats: effects of repetitive stimulation and the interstimulus interval.
    de Bruin NM; Ellenbroek BA; van Schaijk WJ; Cools AR; Coenen AM; van Luijtelaar EL
    Biol Psychol; 2001 Feb; 55(3):195-213. PubMed ID: 11240214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Responses of auditory nerve fibers of the unanesthetized decerebrate cat to click pairs as simulated echoes.
    Parham K; Zhao HB; Kim DO
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Jul; 76(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 8836205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of P50 auditory sensory gating measures in infants during active sleep.
    Hunter SK; Corral N; Ponicsan H; Ross RG
    Neuroreport; 2008 Jan; 19(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 18281897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reduced P50 suppression is associated with the cognitive disorganisation dimension of schizotypy.
    Evans LH; Gray NS; Snowden RJ
    Schizophr Res; 2007 Dec; 97(1-3):152-62. PubMed ID: 17884353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The P50 midlatency auditory evoked potential in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP).
    Fann AV; Preston MA; Bray P; Mamiya N; Williams DK; Skinner RD; Garcia-Rill E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Mar; 116(3):681-9. PubMed ID: 15721082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.