264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9146618)
1. Has there been a recent shift in the pathological features and prognosis of patients treated with radical prostatectomy?
Soh S; Kattan MW; Berkman S; Wheeler TM; Scardino PT
J Urol; 1997 Jun; 157(6):2212-8. PubMed ID: 9146618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lack of association of prostate carcinoma nuclear grading with prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Zhou M; Hayasaka S; Taylor JM; Shah R; Proverbs-Singh T; Manley S; Rubin MA
J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2193-7. PubMed ID: 11696734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preoperative serum prostate specific antigen does not reflect biochemical failure rates after radical prostatectomy in men with large volume cancers.
Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1596-600. PubMed ID: 11025712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term hazard of progression after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: continued risk of biochemical failure after 5 years.
Amling CL; Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Seay TM; Slezak J; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Jul; 164(1):101-5. PubMed ID: 10840432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radical prostatectomy for pathological Gleason 8 or greater prostate cancer: influence of concomitant pathological variables.
Lau WK; Bergstralh EJ; Blute ML; Slezak JM; Zincke H
J Urol; 2002 Jan; 167(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 11743287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pathological parameters of radical prostatectomy for clinical stages T1c versus T2 prostate adenocarcinoma: decreased pathological stage and increased detection of transition zone tumors.
Jack GS; Cookson MS; Coffey CS; Vader V; Roberts RL; Chang SS; Smith JA; Shappell SB
J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):519-24. PubMed ID: 12131301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Histopathological prostate cancer characteristics at radical prostatectomy after population based screening.
Hoedemaeker RF; Rietbergen JB; Kranse R; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
J Urol; 2000 Aug; 164(2):411-5. PubMed ID: 10893598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The extent of lymphadenectomy for pTXNO prostate cancer does not affect prostate cancer outcome in the prostate specific antigen era.
DiMarco DS; Zincke H; Sebo TJ; Slezak J; Bergstralh EJ; Blute ML
J Urol; 2005 Apr; 173(4):1121-5. PubMed ID: 15758719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of prostate-specific antigen testing on the clinical and pathological outcomes after radical prostatectomy for Gleason 8-10 cancers.
Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Blute ML
BJU Int; 2008 Feb; 101(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 17922854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic factors for survival of patients with pathological Gleason score 7 prostate cancer: differences in outcome between primary Gleason grades 3 and 4.
Lau WK; Blute ML; Bostwick DG; Weaver AL; Sebo TJ; Zincke H
J Urol; 2001 Nov; 166(5):1692-7. PubMed ID: 11586204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radical prostatectomy for clinically localized, high risk prostate cancer: critical analysis of risk assessment methods.
Yossepowitch O; Eggener SE; Bianco FJ; Carver BS; Serio A; Scardino PT; Eastham JA
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):493-9; discussion 499. PubMed ID: 17561152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pathological outcomes and biochemical progression in men with T1c prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy with prostate specific antigen 2.6 to 4.0 vs 4.1 to 6.0 ng/ml.
Makarov DV; Humphreys EB; Mangold LA; Walsh PC; Partin AW; Epstein JI; Freedland SJ
J Urol; 2006 Aug; 176(2):554-8. PubMed ID: 16813888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subclassification of clinical stage T1 prostate cancer: impact on biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Carter HB; Peck HJ; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1277-80; discussion 1280-1. PubMed ID: 17698121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improved clinical staging system combining biopsy laterality and TNM stage for men with T1c and T2 prostate cancer: results from the SEARCH database.
Freedland SJ; Presti JC; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Aronson WJ; Dorey F; Amling CL;
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2129-35. PubMed ID: 12771734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Standard versus age-specific prostate specific antigen reference ranges among men with clinically localized prostate cancer: A pathological analysis.
Partin AW; Criley SR; Subong EN; Zincke H; Walsh PC; Oesterling JE
J Urol; 1996 Apr; 155(4):1336-9. PubMed ID: 8632568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen level significantly related to clinical recurrence after radical retropubic prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer?
Haukaas SA; Halvorsen OJ; Daehlin L; Hostmark J; Akslen LA
BJU Int; 2006 Jan; 97(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 16336328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pathological characteristics and prognosis of nonpalpable and palpable prostate cancers with a Hybritech prostate specific antigen of 4 to 10 ng./ml.
Geary ES; Stamey TA
J Urol; 1996 Sep; 156(3):1056-8. PubMed ID: 8709306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Salvage radical prostatectomy: outcome measured by serum prostate specific antigen levels.
Rogers E; Ohori M; Kassabian VS; Wheeler TM; Scardino PT
J Urol; 1995 Jan; 153(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 7526002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Cheng L; Jones TD; Lin H; Eble JN; Zeng G; Carr MD; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2181-5. PubMed ID: 16280760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
