These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 914674)

  • 1. Sound levels in a 2-cc cavity, a Zwislocki coupler, and occluded ear canals.
    Larson VD; Studebaker GA; Cox RM
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 3(2):63-70. PubMed ID: 914674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Side branch and parallel vent effects in real ears and in acoustical and electrical models.
    Studebaker GA; Cox RM
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 3(2):108-17. PubMed ID: 914672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [In-situ measurement as necessary component of hearing aid fitting].
    Brügel FJ; Schorn K
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1991 Nov; 70(11):616-9. PubMed ID: 1755901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of RECD transducer when deriving real-ear sound pressure level.
    Munro KJ; Millward KE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):409-23. PubMed ID: 16825890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transverse pressure distributions in a simple model ear canal occluded by a hearing aid test fixture.
    Stinson MR; Daigle GA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jun; 121(6):3689-702. PubMed ID: 17552720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Probe tube systems: effects of equalization on real ear insertion and aided gain.
    Moskal NL; Goldstein DP
    Ear Hear; 1992 Feb; 13(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 1541373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Deriving the real-ear SPL of audiometric data using the "coupler to dial difference" and the "real ear to coupler difference".
    Munro KJ; Davis J
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):100-10. PubMed ID: 12677107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An in situ calibration for hearing thresholds.
    Withnell RH; Jeng PS; Waldvogel K; Morgenstein K; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Mar; 125(3):1605-11. PubMed ID: 19275318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using the Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference within the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Protocols for Applying and Predicting Earmold RECDs.
    Moodie S; Pietrobon J; Rall E; Lindley G; Eiten L; Gordey D; Davidson L; Moodie KS; Bagatto M; Haluschak MM; Folkeard P; Scollie S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Mar; 27(3):264-275. PubMed ID: 26967366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of probe insertion depth on real ear measurements.
    Dirks DD; Ahlstrom JB; Eisenberg LS
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1994 Jan; 110(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 8290304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sound pressure in insert earphone couplers and real ears.
    Burkhard MD; Sachs RM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1977 Dec; 20(4):799-807. PubMed ID: 604691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of acoustic ear canal impedances: finite element simulation of measurement methods using a coupling tube.
    Schmidt S; Hudde H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3819-27. PubMed ID: 19507964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of real-ear to coupler difference values in the right and left ear of adults using three earmold configurations.
    Munro KJ; Buttfield LM
    Ear Hear; 2005 Jun; 26(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 15937410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Signal delivery/real ear measurement system for hearing aid selection and fitting.
    Zelisko DL; Seewald RC; Gagné JP
    Ear Hear; 1992 Dec; 13(6):460-3. PubMed ID: 1342584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Probe-determined hearing-aid gain compared to functional and coupler gains.
    Zemplenyi J; Dirks D; Gilman S
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Sep; 28(3):394-404. PubMed ID: 4046580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Earmold modification effect measured by coupler, threshold and probe techniques.
    Studebaker GA; Cox RM; Wark DJ
    Audiology; 1978; 17(2):173-86. PubMed ID: 646735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Filter effect of earmold venting: comparison of electroacoustic and psychoacoustic methods of evaluation.
    Franks JR; Cooper WA; McFall RN
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 3(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 893203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating head-related transfer functions of human subjects from pressure-velocity measurements.
    Hiipakka M; Kinnari T; Pulkki V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 May; 131(5):4051-61. PubMed ID: 22559378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Verifying the attenuation of earplugs in situ: method validation on human subjects including individualized numerical simulations.
    Bockstael A; Van Renterghem T; Botteldooren D; D'Haenens W; Keppler H; Maes L; Philips B; Swinnen F; Vinck B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Mar; 125(3):1479-89. PubMed ID: 19275306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Verifying the attenuation of earplugs in situ: method validation using artificial head and numerical simulations.
    Bockstael A; de Greve B; Van Renterghem T; Botteldooren D; D'Haenens W; Keppler H; Maes L; Philips B; Swinnen F; Vinck B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):973-81. PubMed ID: 18681589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.