These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9147301)

  • 1. Study of occlusal contact variability within individuals in a position of maximum intercuspation using the T-SCAN system.
    González Sequeros O; Garrido García VC; García Cartagena A
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Apr; 24(4):287-90. PubMed ID: 9147301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of occlusal contacts in maximum intercuspation using the T-Scan system.
    Garrido García VC; García Cartagena A; González Sequeros O
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Dec; 24(12):899-903. PubMed ID: 9467991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of two methods for occlusal contact registration with the T-Scan system.
    Garcia Cartagena A; Gonzalez Sequeros O; Garrido Garcia VC
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Jun; 24(6):426-32. PubMed ID: 9219986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity of the examination method of occlusal contact pattern relating to mandibular position.
    Ogawa T; Ogimoto T; Koyano K
    J Dent; 2000 Jan; 28(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 10666958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computerized occlusal analysis as an alternative occlusal indicator.
    Afrashtehfar KI; Qadeer S
    Cranio; 2016 Jan; 34(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 25323220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The balance of occlusal contacts during intercuspation using T-scan system].
    Nabeshima F; Tanaka M; Kawano W; Saratani K; Yanagida M; Kawazoe T
    Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Apr; 34(2):340-9. PubMed ID: 2134787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An investigation of the ability of computerized axiography to reproduce occlusal contacts.
    Franklin P; McLelland R; Brunton P
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2010 Mar; 18(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 20397498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phenomenon of domination of the strongest contacts in centric occlusion.
    Filtchev AD; Kalachev YS
    Quintessence Int; 2008 Mar; 39(3):e99-106. PubMed ID: 18618031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in tooth contacts following orthodontic treatment.
    Durbin DS; Sadowsky C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1986 Nov; 90(5):375-82. PubMed ID: 3465232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts.
    Delong R; Ko CC; Anderson GC; Hodges JS; Douglas WH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):622-30. PubMed ID: 12488856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Analysis of occlusal contacts of children by the T-Scan system. (1) The reproducibility of the sensor].
    Okamoto K; Okamoto Y; Shinoda K; Tamura Y
    Shoni Shikagaku Zasshi; 1990; 28(4):975-83. PubMed ID: 2134133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical reproducibility of GEDAS--"Greifswald Digital Analyzing System" for displaying occlusal contact patterns.
    Hützen D; Rebau M; Kordass B
    Int J Comput Dent; 2006 Apr; 9(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 16955651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distribution of occlusal contacts in maximum intercuspation.
    Maness WL; Podoloff R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Aug; 62(2):238-42. PubMed ID: 2760866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Occlusal contact in children with Temporomandibular Disorders. A pilot study.
    Oliveira de Santis T; Jansiski Motta L; Cardoso Guedes C; Santos Z; Santos Fernandes KP; Mesquita Ferrari RA; Bussadori SK
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2012 Jun; 13(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 22762169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative analysis of occlusal balance in intercuspal position using the T-Scan system.
    Mizui M; Nabeshima F; Tosa J; Tanaka M; Kawazoe T
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 8179785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of occlusal indicator sensitivity.
    Saraçoğlu A; Ozpinar B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):522-6. PubMed ID: 12474003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The reproducibility of condylar hinge axis positions in patients, by different operators, using the electronic mandibular position indicator.
    Tuppy F; Celar RM; Celar AG; Piehslinger E; Jäger W
    J Orofac Pain; 1994; 8(3):315-20. PubMed ID: 7812230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Occlusal contacts in maximum intercuspation in normal dentitions.
    McDevitt WE; Warreth AA
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Oct; 24(10):725-34. PubMed ID: 9372462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of impression volume and double-arch trays on the registration of maximum intercuspation.
    Hahn SM; Millstein PL; Kinnunen TH; Wright RF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 19961994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recording centric and eccentric occlusal disturbances with a new recording device.
    Kleinrok M
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Oct; 68(4):597-606. PubMed ID: 1403935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.