These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9147527)

  • 1. Processes involved in reading imaging studies: workflow analysis and implications for workstation development.
    Gay SB; Sobel AH; Young LQ; Dwyer SJ
    J Digit Imaging; 1997 Feb; 10(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 9147527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Process involved in reading imaging studies: workflow analysis and implications for workstation development.
    Gay SB; Sobel AH; Young LQ; Dwyer SJ
    J Digit Imaging; 2002 Sep; 15(3):171-7; discussion 170. PubMed ID: 12641097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiologists' productivity in the interpretation of CT scans: a comparison of PACS with conventional film.
    Reiner BI; Siegel EL; Hooper FJ; Pomerantz S; Dahlke A; Rallis D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Apr; 176(4):861-4. PubMed ID: 11264065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of interpretation of CT scans: comparing PACS monitor displays and hard-copy images.
    Reiner BI; Siegel EL; Hooper FJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Dec; 179(6):1407-10. PubMed ID: 12438025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation of PET/CT standardized uptake value measurements between dedicated workstations and a PACS-integrated workstation system.
    Meirelles GS; Kijewski P; Akhurst T
    J Digit Imaging; 2007 Sep; 20(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 16972011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Finding-specific display presets for computed radiography soft-copy reading.
    Andriole KP; Gould RG; Webb WR
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):3-5. PubMed ID: 10342153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advantages and Disadvantages in Image Processing with Free Software in Radiology.
    Mujika KM; Méndez JAJ; de Miguel AF
    J Med Syst; 2018 Jan; 42(3):36. PubMed ID: 29333590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of smartphone-based teleradiology for evaluating thoracolumbar spine fractures.
    Stahl I; Dreyfuss D; Ofir D; Merom L; Raichel M; Hous N; Norman D; Haddad E
    Spine J; 2017 Feb; 17(2):161-167. PubMed ID: 27542623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiologists' reading times using PACS and using films: one practice's experience.
    Fleishon HB; Bhargavan M; Meghea C
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Apr; 13(4):453-60. PubMed ID: 16554225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implementation and performance evaluation of simultaneous PET/MR whole-body imaging with continuous table motion.
    Braun H; Ziegler S; Lentschig MG; Quick HH
    J Nucl Med; 2014 Jan; 55(1):161-8. PubMed ID: 24232869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hardware and software requirements for a picture archiving and communication system's diagnostic workstations.
    Haynor DR; Smith DV; Park HW; Kim Y
    J Digit Imaging; 1992 May; 5(2):107-17. PubMed ID: 1623039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of respiratory motion variability and tumor size on the accuracy of average intensity projection from four-dimensional computed tomography: an investigation based on dynamic MRI.
    Cai J; Read PW; Sheng K
    Med Phys; 2008 Nov; 35(11):4974-81. PubMed ID: 19070231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Recommendations for the selection of storage media for archiving digital radiological image data based on the comparison of retrieval times at different PACS archive levels].
    Wirth S; Treitl M; Lucke A; Mittermaier I; Nissen-Meyer S; Villain S; Pfeifer KJ; Reiser M
    Rofo; 2005 Feb; 177(2):250-7. PubMed ID: 15666234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. PET/CT image navigation and communication.
    Ratib O
    J Nucl Med; 2004 Jan; 45 Suppl 1():46S-55S. PubMed ID: 14736835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of film-based versus filmless operation on the productivity of CT technologists.
    Reiner BI; Siegel EL; Hooper FJ; Glasser D
    Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):481-5. PubMed ID: 9577498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How many screens does a CT workstation need?
    Beard DV; Hemminger BM; Denelsbeck KM; Johnston RE
    J Digit Imaging; 1994 May; 7(2):69-76. PubMed ID: 8075186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detecting hepatic lesions: the added utility of CT liver window settings.
    Mayo-Smith WW; Gupta H; Ridlen MS; Brody JM; Clements NC; Cronan JJ
    Radiology; 1999 Mar; 210(3):601-4. PubMed ID: 10207455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of a low-cost, PC-based image review workstation at a radiology department.
    Passadore DJ; Isoardi RA; Ariza PP; Padín C
    J Digit Imaging; 2001 Jun; 14(2 Suppl 1):222-3. PubMed ID: 11442105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of image reject rates when using film, hard copy computed radiography and soft copy images on picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) workstations.
    Weatherburn GC; Bryan S; West M
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Jul; 72(859):653-60. PubMed ID: 10624322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Workstation scheme and implementation for a medical imaging information system.
    Tao Y; Miao J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2003 May; 116(5):654-7. PubMed ID: 12875671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.