These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9147545)

  • 1. The removal index for evaluation of dialysis.
    Chen TW; Huang TP; Liu MC; Wang ML
    Perit Dial Int; 1996; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 9147545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chronic renal replacement therapy in children: which index is best for adequacy?
    Verrina E; Brendolan A; Gusmano R; Ronco C
    Kidney Int; 1998 Nov; 54(5):1690-6. PubMed ID: 9844146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Significance of nitrogen removal mass in uremic patients on different modalities of dialysis therapy.
    Chen TW; Huang TP; Wang ML
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2000 Feb; 99(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 10770025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The peak concentration hypothesis: a urea kinetic approach to comparing the adequacy of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and hemodialysis.
    Keshaviah PR; Nolph KD; Van Stone JC
    Perit Dial Int; 1989; 9(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 2488377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison between urea removal in hemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis using a mathematical kinetic model.
    Kanamori T; Sakai K
    Int J Artif Organs; 1997 Mar; 20(3):158-62. PubMed ID: 9151151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of two different Kt/V methods in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients.
    Sanlidag C; Cavdar C; Sifil A; Hastaoglu S; Uretmen P; Camsari T
    Perit Dial Int; 1999; 19 Suppl 2():S514-6. PubMed ID: 10406576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adequacy of peritoneal dialysis: does kt/v have the same predictive value as in HD? A multicenter study.
    De Alvaro F; Bajo MA; Alvarez-Ude F; Vigil A; Molina A; Coronel F; Selgas R
    Adv Perit Dial; 1992; 8():93-7. PubMed ID: 1361862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Survival comparison between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis based on matched doses of delivered therapy.
    Keshaviah P; Collins AJ; Ma JZ; Churchill DN; Thorpe KE
    J Am Soc Nephrol; 2002 Jan; 13 Suppl 1():S48-52. PubMed ID: 11792762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The solute removal index--a unified basis for comparing disparate therapies.
    Keshaviah P
    Perit Dial Int; 1995; 15(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 7612726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictive value of dialysis adequacy and nutritional indices for mortality and morbidity in CAPD and HD patients. A longitudinal study.
    Maiorca R; Brunori G; Zubani R; Cancarini GC; Manili L; Camerini C; Movilli E; Pola A; d'Avolio G; Gelatti U
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1995 Dec; 10(12):2295-305. PubMed ID: 8808229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An integrative description of dialysis adequacy indices for different treatment modalities and schedules of dialysis.
    Debowska M; Waniewski J; Lindholm B
    Artif Organs; 2007 Jan; 31(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 17209962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. No difference in nitrogen balance between standard prescriptions of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.
    Lu Q; Cheng L; Axelsson J; Lindholm B; Wang T
    Blood Purif; 2008; 26(6):511-7. PubMed ID: 18931478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Urea kinetic analysis of automated peritoneal dialysis allows calculation of a CAPD-equivalent Kt/V(urea).
    Schurman SJ; Shoemaker LR; Warady BA
    Kidney Int; 2000 Sep; 58(3):1318-24. PubMed ID: 10972696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The effect of the number of peritonitis episodes on peritoneal membrane function].
    Jovanović D; Nesić V; Dimitrijević Z
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1999; 127(1-2):28-31. PubMed ID: 10377837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. KT/V: the denominator dilemma.
    Lindholm B; Waniewski J; Weryński A
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2003 Oct; 15(88):311-5. PubMed ID: 14974355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adequacy in dialysis: intermittent versus continuous therapies.
    Misra M; Nolph KD
    Nefrologia; 2000; 20 Suppl 3():25-32. PubMed ID: 10835874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Higher Kt/V is needed for adequate dialysis if the treatment time is reduced. Insights from a blood flow distribution model.
    Haraldsson B
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1995 Oct; 10(10):1845-51. PubMed ID: 8592592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of adequacy in peritoneal dialysis.
    Ronco C; Conz P; Bosch JP; Lew SQ; La Greca G
    Adv Ren Replace Ther; 1994 Apr; 1(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 7641084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Urea kinetics evaluation of hemodialysis and CAPD patients.
    Acchiardo SR; Kraus AP; LaHatte G; Kaufman PA; Adkins D; Moore LW
    Adv Perit Dial; 1992; 8():55-8. PubMed ID: 1361852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peritoneal urea and creatinine clearances in continuous peritoneal dialysis patients with different types of peritoneal solute transport.
    Tzamaloukas AH; Murata GH; Piraino B; Rao P; Bernardini J; Malhotra D; Oreopoulos DG
    Kidney Int; 1998 May; 53(5):1405-11. PubMed ID: 9573559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.