These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9148198)

  • 1. A pop-out induced extinction-like phenomenon in neurologically intact subjects.
    Pollmann S
    Neuropsychologia; 1996 May; 34(5):413-25. PubMed ID: 9148198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extinction-like effects in normals: independence of localization and response selection.
    Pollmann S
    Brain Cogn; 2000 Dec; 44(3):324-41. PubMed ID: 11104529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A systematic study of visual extinction. Between- and within-field deficits of attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Vuilleumier PO; Rafal RD
    Brain; 2000 Jun; 123 ( Pt 6)():1263-79. PubMed ID: 10825363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of the corpus callosum in visual orienting: importance of interhemispheric visual transfer.
    Pollmann S; Zaidel E
    Neuropsychologia; 1998 Aug; 36(8):763-74. PubMed ID: 9751440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stronger interference from distractors in the right hemifield during visual search.
    Carlei C; Kerzel D
    Laterality; 2018 Mar; 23(2):152-165. PubMed ID: 28502226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The visual hemifield asymmetry in the spatial blink during singleton search and feature search.
    Burnham BR; Rozell CA; Kasper A; Bianco NE; Delliturri A
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Apr; 75(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 21295901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Objections against the view of visual extinction as an attentional disengagement deficit: the interaction between spatial position and temporal modulation.
    de Haan B; Karnath HO
    Cortex; 2012 Sep; 48(8):972-9. PubMed ID: 21513929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of remote distractors on saccade programming: evidence for an extended fixation zone.
    Walker R; Deubel H; Schneider WX; Findlay JM
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Aug; 78(2):1108-19. PubMed ID: 9307138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual interactions between bilaterally presented words: what you get is often not what you see.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychology; 2003 Oct; 17(4):566-77. PubMed ID: 14599270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nasotemporal ERP differences: evidence for increased inhibition of temporal distractors.
    Huber-Huber C; Grubert A; Ansorge U; Eimer M
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 113(7):2210-9. PubMed ID: 25589587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The bilateral effect: callosal inhibition or intrahemispheric competition?
    Olk B; Hartje W
    Brain Cogn; 2001 Apr; 45(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 11305876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contralesional distractors enhance ipsilesional target processing after right-hemispheric stroke.
    Vossel S; Fink GR
    Cortex; 2016 May; 78():115-124. PubMed ID: 27035700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hemispheric asymmetries in categorical perception of orientation in infants and adults.
    Franklin A; Catherwood D; Alvarez J; Axelsson E
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2648-57. PubMed ID: 20519136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relation between saccade trajectories and spatial distractor locations.
    Van der Stigchel S; Theeuwes J
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 25(2):579-82. PubMed ID: 16137868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A psychophysical study of visual extinction: ipsilesional distractor interference with contralesional orientation thresholds in visual hemineglect patients.
    Geeraerts S; Lafosse C; Vandenbussche E; Verfaillie K
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(4):530-41. PubMed ID: 15716143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acute visual neglect and extinction: distinct functional state of the visuospatial attention system.
    Umarova RM; Saur D; Kaller CP; Vry MS; Glauche V; Mader I; Hennig J; Weiller C
    Brain; 2011 Nov; 134(Pt 11):3310-25. PubMed ID: 21948940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interhemispheric stroop-like interference in number comparison: evidence for strong interhemispheric integration of semantic number information.
    Ratinckx E; Brysbaert M
    Neuropsychology; 2002 Apr; 16(2):217-29. PubMed ID: 11949714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neglect and hemianopia superimposed.
    Müller-Oehring EM; Kasten E; Poggel DA; Schulte T; Strasburger H; Sabel BA
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2003 Dec; 25(8):1154-68. PubMed ID: 14566587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Distractor modulation of saccade trajectories: spatial separation and symmetry effects.
    McSorley E; Haggard P; Walker R
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Apr; 155(3):320-33. PubMed ID: 14726987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.