These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9148267)

  • 1. Comparison of the performance of the Nidek NT-2000 noncontact tonometer with the Keeler Pulsair 2000 and the Goldmann applanation tonometer.
    Cho P; Lui T
    Optom Vis Sci; 1997 Jan; 74(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 9148267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of the Keeler Pulsair 3000 non-contact tonometer.
    Lawson-Kopp W; DeJong A; Yudcovitch L; Williams S; Kohl P; Yolton RL
    Optometry; 2002 Feb; 73(2):81-90. PubMed ID: 12365714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Reproducibility of the results of two non-contact tonometers. Comparison with the Goldmann applanation tonometer].
    Gräf M; Hoffmann OF
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1992 Jun; 200(6):678-82. PubMed ID: 1507794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 2000, American Optical MkII and Goldmann applanation tonometers.
    Mackie SW; Jay JL; Ackerley R; Walsh G
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Mar; 16(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 8762780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of a new non-contact tonometer with Goldmann applanation.
    Moseley MJ; Evans NM; Fielder AR
    Eye (Lond); 1989; 3 ( Pt 3)():332-7. PubMed ID: 2612679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison of tonometry with the Keeler air puff non-contact tonometer "Pulsair" and the Goldmann applanation tonometer].
    Yücel AA; Stürmer J; Gloor B
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1990 Oct; 197(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 2280569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy and reliability of the Keeler Pulsair EasyEye non-contact tonometer.
    Ogbuehi KC; Almubrad TM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jan; 85(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 18174841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The validity of a new noncontact tonometer and its comparison with the Goldmann tonometer.
    Lam AK; Chan R; Lam CH
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Aug; 81(8):601-5. PubMed ID: 15300119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement of the intraocular pressure with the "transpalpebral tonometer" TGDc-01 in comparison with applanation tonometry.
    Sandner D; Böhm A; Kostov S; Pillunat L
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Jun; 243(6):563-9. PubMed ID: 15614540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of intraocular pressure as measured by three different non-contact tonometers and goldmann applanation tonometer for non-glaucomatous subjects.
    Bang SP; Lee CE; Kim YC
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 17(1):199. PubMed ID: 29096616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical comparison of Pulsair non-contact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in Indian population.
    Mohan S; Tiwari S; Jain A; Gupta J; Sachan SK
    J Optom; 2014; 7(2):86-90. PubMed ID: 24766865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Corneal biomechanical properties: precision and influence on tonometry.
    Ogbuehi KC; Osuagwu UL
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Jun; 37(3):124-31. PubMed ID: 24121009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 3000 with Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Parker VA; Herrtage J; Sarkies NJ
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2001 Nov; 85(11):1303-4. PubMed ID: 11673293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of repeated applanation on subsequent IOP measurements.
    AlMubrad TM; Ogbuehi KC
    Clin Exp Optom; 2008 Nov; 91(6):524-9. PubMed ID: 18651843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Icare PRO Rebound Tonometer, Tomey FT-1000 Noncontact Tonometer, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Healthy Subjects.
    Güler M; Bilak Ş; Bilgin B; Şimşek A; Çapkin M; Hakim Reyhan A
    J Glaucoma; 2015; 24(8):613-8. PubMed ID: 25264986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the Pulsair noncontact tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer.
    Climenhaga H; Plucinska H
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1989 Feb; 24(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 2713754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of the new TGDc-01 "PRA" palpebral tonometer: comparison with contact and non-contact tonometry.
    García Resúa C; Giráldez Fernández MJ; Cerviño Expósito A; González Pérez J; Yebra-Pimentel E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Feb; 82(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 15711462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Keeler Pulsair air impulse tonometer. Comparison with the Perkins hand-held applanation tonometer for peri-operative measurement of intra-ocular pressure.
    Bricker SR; McGalliard JN; Mostafa SM
    Anaesthesia; 1990 Jan; 45(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 2316837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the Keeler Pulsair non-contact tonometer.
    Sponsel WE; Kaufman PL; Strinden TI; DePaul KL; Bowes HN; Olander KW; Barnebey HS
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1989 Oct; 67(5):567-72. PubMed ID: 2589057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 2000 non-contact tonometer with Goldmann applanation.
    Moseley MJ; Thompson JR; Deutsch J; Misson GP; Naylor G; Tan-Yee A; Taylor RH; Fielder AR
    Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 1)():127-30. PubMed ID: 8325401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.