These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9148267)

  • 21. Reliability of the Nidek NT-1000 non contact tonometer.
    Van de Velde T; Zeyen T
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 1995; 255():19-22. PubMed ID: 7496571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population.
    Fernandes P; Díaz-Rey JA; Queirós A; Gonzalez-Meijome JM; Jorge J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 16101950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparative study of intraocular pressure measurement by three tonometers in normal subjects.
    Prabhakar SK; Mahesh BS; Shanthamallappa M
    Nepal J Ophthalmol; 2013; 5(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 24172555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of central corneal thickness on measured intraocular pressure differentials: Nidek RKT-7700, Topcon CT-80 NCTs and Goldmann Tonometer.
    Ogbuehi KC; Mucke S; Osuagwu UL
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Nov; 32(6):547-55. PubMed ID: 23009324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. On repeated corneal applanation with the Goldmann and two non-contact tonometers.
    Almubrad TM; Ogbuehi KC
    Clin Exp Optom; 2010 Mar; 93(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 20406256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Proview phosphene tonometer fails to measure ocular pressure accurately in clinical practice.
    Alvarez TL; Gollance SA; Thomas GA; Greene RJ; Marchetto PM; Moore EJ; Realini T; Liebmann JM; Ritch R; Lama P; Fechtner RD
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Jun; 111(6):1077-85. PubMed ID: 15177956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reliability of the non-contact tono-pachymeter Tonopachy NT-530P in healthy eyes.
    García-Resúa C; Pena-Verdeal H; Miñones M; Giraldez MJ; Yebra-Pimentel E
    Clin Exp Optom; 2013 May; 96(3):286-94. PubMed ID: 23414260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A new tonometer--the Corvis ST tonometer: clinical comparison with noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers.
    Hong J; Xu J; Wei A; Deng SX; Cui X; Yu X; Sun X
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jan; 54(1):659-65. PubMed ID: 23307970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical performance of the Reichert AT550: a new non-contact tonometer.
    Jorge J; Díaz-Rey JA; González-Méijome JM; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2002 Nov; 22(6):560-4. PubMed ID: 12477021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare
    Valero B; Fénolland JR; Rosenberg R; Sendon D; Mesnard C; Sigaux M; Giraud JM; Renard JP
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Dec; 40(10):865-875. PubMed ID: 29174296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Level of disagreement between Proview phosphene tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer intraocular pressure readings.
    Rai S; Moster MR; Kesen M; Fontanarosa J; Spaeth GL; Steinmann WC; Wilson R; Myers J; Henderer J
    J Glaucoma; 2005 Apr; 14(2):120-3. PubMed ID: 15741812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical evaluation of five portable tonometers.
    Wingert TA; Bassi CJ; McAlister WH; Galanis JC
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):670-4. PubMed ID: 8576531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Deterioration in the accuracy of the pulsair non-contact tonometer with use: need for regular calibration.
    Atkinson PL; Wishart PK; James JN; Vernon SA; Reid F
    Eye (Lond); 1992; 6 ( Pt 5)():530-4. PubMed ID: 1286721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of intraocular pressures after myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy: tonometry-pachymetry, Goldmann applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, and noncontact tonometry.
    Han KE; Kim H; Kim NR; Jun I; Kim EK; Kim TI
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jun; 39(6):888-97. PubMed ID: 23688875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Rebound tonometer: ideal tonometer for measurement of accurate intraocular pressure.
    Suman S; Agrawal A; Pal VK; Pratap VB
    J Glaucoma; 2014 Dec; 23(9):633-7. PubMed ID: 23429611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Clinical comparison of the Tono-Pen tonometer to the Goldmann applanation tonometer].
    Jiang B; Jiang Y
    Yan Ke Xue Bao; 2002 Dec; 18(4):226-9. PubMed ID: 15515766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of the Tono-Pen and the Pulsair tonometers.
    Armstrong TA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1990 Jun; 109(6):716-20. PubMed ID: 2346202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of keratometric readings on comparative intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann, Tono-Pen, and noncontact tonometers.
    Paranhos A; Paranhos FR; Prata JA; Omi CA; Mello PA; Shields MB
    J Glaucoma; 2000 Jun; 9(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 10877372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the Reichert Pt100, the Keeler Pulsair Intellipuff portable noncontact tonometers, and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Hubanova R; Aptel F; Zhou T; Arnol N; Romanet JP; Chiquet C
    J Glaucoma; 2015; 24(5):356-63. PubMed ID: 24240887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Measurement of intraocular pressure with a modern noncontact tonometer.
    Koçak I; Orgül S; Saruhan A; Haefliger I; Hendrickson P; Flammer J
    Ophthalmologica; 1998; 212(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 9486545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.