These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9148285)

  • 41. Examining faking on personality inventories using unfolding item response theory models.
    Scherbaum CA; Sabet J; Kern MJ; Agnello P
    J Pers Assess; 2013; 95(2):207-16. PubMed ID: 23030769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Relationship satisfaction in women: a longitudinal case-control study about the role of breast cancer, personal assertiveness, and partners' relationship-focused coping.
    Hinnen C; Hagedoorn M; Ranchor AV; Sanderman R
    Br J Health Psychol; 2008 Nov; 13(Pt 4):737-54. PubMed ID: 17999780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Faking and its detection on the Holden Psychological Screening Inventory.
    Holden RR
    Psychol Rep; 1995 Jun; 76(3 Pt 2):1235-40. PubMed ID: 7480492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. IAT faking indices revisited: Aspects of replicability and differential validity.
    Röhner J; Holden RR; Schütz A
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Feb; 55(2):670-693. PubMed ID: 35441359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A comparison of the PAI and MMPI-2 as predictors of faking bad in college students.
    Blanchard DD; McGrath RE; Pogge DL; Khadivi A
    J Pers Assess; 2003 Apr; 80(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 12700022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Assessing women's responses to sexual threat: validity of a virtual role-play procedure.
    Jouriles EN; Simpson Rowe L; McDonald R; Platt CG; Gomez GS
    Behav Ther; 2011 Sep; 42(3):475-84. PubMed ID: 21658529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Assertiveness and caring: are they compatible?
    McCartan PJ; Hargie OD
    J Clin Nurs; 2004 Sep; 13(6):707-13. PubMed ID: 15317510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Differences in assertion and aggression between normal and neurotic family triads.
    Shepperson VL
    J Pers Assess; 1982 Aug; 46(4):409-14. PubMed ID: 7120021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Forced-choice assessments of personality for selection: evaluating issues of normative assessment and faking resistance.
    Heggestad ED; Morrison M; Reeve CL; McCloy RA
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 Jan; 91(1):9-24. PubMed ID: 16435935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Changes in women's assertiveness in response to status and roles: a cross-temporal meta-analysis, 1931-1993.
    Twenge JM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2001 Jul; 81(1):133-45. PubMed ID: 11474719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Correction for faking in self-report personality tests.
    Sjöberg L
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Oct; 56(5):582-91. PubMed ID: 26043667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Controlling social desirability may attenuate faking effects: a study with aggression measures.
    Anguiano-Carrasco C; Vigil-Colet A; Ferrando PJ
    Psicothema; 2013; 25(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 23628529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Assertive women as expert witnesses: a study of assertive and defensive responses in male and female experts.
    Larson BA; Brodsky SL
    Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(2):149-63. PubMed ID: 24691753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Sex-typed responses in the Rorschach protocols of children with gender identity disorder.
    Zucker KJ; Lozinski JA; Bradley SJ; Doering RW
    J Pers Assess; 1992 Apr; 58(2):295-310. PubMed ID: 1578330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The effects of assertive training on performance in highly anxious adolescents.
    Wehr SH; Kaufman ME
    Adolescence; 1987; 22(85):195-205. PubMed ID: 3591496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Re-examination of assertiveness and aggressiveness as potential moderators of verbal intentions.
    Swanson SR
    Psychol Rep; 1999 Jun; 84(3 Pt 2):1111-4. PubMed ID: 10477931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparing forced-choice and single-stimulus personality scores on a level playing field: A meta-analysis of psychometric properties and susceptibility to faking.
    Speer AB; Wegmeyer LJ; Tenbrink AP; Delacruz AY; Christiansen ND; Salim RM
    J Appl Psychol; 2023 Nov; 108(11):1812-1833. PubMed ID: 37326537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The need for power and fear of assertiveness in English-speaking South African female graduates.
    Hirschowitz R; Nell V
    J Psychol; 1985 Nov; 119(6):603-12. PubMed ID: 3835273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Deceptiveness on the PAI: a study of naïve faking with psychiatric inpatients.
    Baity MR; Siefert CJ; Chambers A; Blais MA
    J Pers Assess; 2007 Feb; 88(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 17266410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effect of symptom information and intelligence in dissimulation: an examination of faking response styles by inmates on the Basic Personality Inventory.
    Steffan JS; Kroner DG; Morgan RD
    Assessment; 2007 Mar; 14(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 17314177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.