These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

506 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9148886)

  • 1. Group dynamics in forensic pretrial decision-making.
    Pitt SE; Brandt JD; Tellefsen C; Janofsky JS; Cohen ME; Bettis ED; Rappeport JR
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 9148886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Criminal offense, psychiatric diagnosis, and psycholegal opinion: an analysis of 894 pretrial referrals.
    Warren JI; Fitch WL; Dietz PE; Rosenfeld BD
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 2039849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting restorability of incompetent criminal defendants.
    Mossman D
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 17389343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An investigation of the ECST-R in male pretrial patients: evaluating the effects of feigning on competency evaluations.
    Vitacco MJ; Rogers R; Gabel J
    Assessment; 2009 Sep; 16(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 19779096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Establishing standards for criminal forensic reports: an empirical analysis.
    Borum R; Grisso T
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1996; 24(3):297-317. PubMed ID: 8889131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Defendants pleading insanity: an analysis of outcome.
    Janofsky JS; Vandewalle MB; Rappeport JR
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 2758121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A neurolaw perspective on psychiatric assessments of criminal responsibility: decision-making, mental disorder, and the brain.
    Meynen G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2013; 36(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 23433730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Beyond competence and sanity: the influence of pretrial evaluation on case disposition.
    Warren JI; Rosenfeld B; Fitch WL
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):379-88. PubMed ID: 7841509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Insanity defense pleas in Baltimore City: an analysis of outcome.
    Janofsky JS; Dunn MH; Roskes EJ; Briskin JK; Rudolph MS
    Am J Psychiatry; 1996 Nov; 153(11):1464-8. PubMed ID: 8890682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Informed decision making in persons acquitted not guilty by reason of insanity.
    Elliott RL; Nelson E; Fitch WL; Scott R; Wolber G; Singh R
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(3):309-20. PubMed ID: 8148513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Opinion formation in evaluating sanity at the time of the offense: an examination of 5175 pre-trial evaluations.
    Warren JI; Murrie DC; Chauhan P; Dietz PE; Morris J
    Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(2):171-86. PubMed ID: 15048857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical symptom presentation in suspected malingerers: an empirical investigation.
    Kucharski LT; Ryan W; Vogt J; Goodloe E
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998; 26(4):579-85. PubMed ID: 9894214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Competency to stand trial adjudication: a comparison of female and male defendants.
    Riley SE
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998; 26(2):223-40. PubMed ID: 9664258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Investigation of verdicts in lawsuits involving competency to stand trial].
    Nakajima N
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2006; 108(11):1128-41. PubMed ID: 17313060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The factors associated with forensic psychiatrists' decisions in criminal responsibility and social dangerousness evaluations.
    Mandarelli G; Carabellese F; Felthous AR; Parmigiani G; Del Casale A; Catanesi R; Montalbò D; Ferracuti S
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 66():101503. PubMed ID: 31706410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new pretrial screening program.
    Rappeport JR; Conti NP; Rudnick B
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1983; 11(3):239-48. PubMed ID: 6640118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Opinion formation in evaluating the adjudicative competence and restorability of criminal defendants: a review of 8,000 evaluations.
    Warren JI; Murrie DC; Stejskal W; Colwell LH; Morris J; Chauhan P; Dietz P
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):113-32. PubMed ID: 16557643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating competency to stand trial with evidence-based practice.
    Rogers R; Johansson-Love J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):450-60. PubMed ID: 20018994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "Too stubborn to ever be governed by enforced insanity": Some therapeutic jurisprudence dilemmas in the representation of criminal defendants in incompetency and insanity cases.
    Perlin ML
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2010; 33(5-6):475-81. PubMed ID: 20947166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mentally ill and non-mentally ill defendants' abilities to understand information relevant to adjudication: a preliminary study.
    Hoge SK; Poythress N; Bonnie R; Eisenberg M; Monahan J; Feucht-Haviar T; Oberlander L
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1996; 24(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 8807159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.