These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9149520)

  • 21. [Estimation of medical protocol correctness in the light of opinions issued as ordered by the judiciary or prosecution authorities].
    Pieśniak D; Jankowski Z; Raszeja S
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2007 Jul; 23(133):47-51. PubMed ID: 18051829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [The legal aspects of wound treatment].
    Peter C
    Krankenpfl Soins Infirm; 2013; 106(3):12-4. PubMed ID: 23534154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Expert testimony, legal reasoning, and justice. The case for adopting a data-based standard of care in allegations of medical negligence in the NICU.
    Meadow W; Lantos JD
    Clin Perinatol; 1996 Sep; 23(3):583-95. PubMed ID: 8884129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Ethical Challenges for the Medical Expert Witness.
    Kass JS; Rose RV
    AMA J Ethics; 2016 Mar; 18(3):201-8. PubMed ID: 27002990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Reproach of malpractice - legal procedure and possible consequences].
    Dittmann V; Hausmann R
    Ther Umsch; 2008 Jul; 65(7):389-93. PubMed ID: 18622922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Civil justice--some problems and possible solutions. Based on the Samuel Gee Lecture 1993.
    Hirst D
    J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1993 Oct; 27(4):435-9. PubMed ID: 8289168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Determining the standard of care in medical negligence litigation in Australia.
    Collins A; Pavlakis J
    Med Law; 1997; 16(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 9212612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Compensating medical injury victims in the United States: there must be a better way.
    Costello M
    Hosp Top; 2005; 83(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 16092633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Contingency fees: victim or contributing cause of medical malpractice reform acts? Roa v. Lodi Medical Group, Inc.
    Reames JE
    Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1989 Jul; (125):7-31. PubMed ID: 10293925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The impact of the new civil practice rules on clinical negligence claims.
    Brahams D
    Med Leg J; 1999; 67(Pt 1):7-8. PubMed ID: 12528414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Expert testimony: a perspective from the trenches.
    Hawkins TS
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Feb; 2(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 17411781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The role of clinical guidelines in medical negligence litigation: a shift from the Bolam standard?
    Samanta A; Mello MM; Foster C; Tingle J; Samanta J
    Med Law Rev; 2006; 14(3):321-66. PubMed ID: 16901977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Developing clinical guidelines: present and future legal aspects.
    Tingle J
    Br J Nurs; 1998 Jun 11-24; 7(11):672-4. PubMed ID: 9709061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Adapting to concurrent expert evidence in medical litigation.
    Cockburn T; Madden B
    J Law Med; 2015 Mar; 22(3):610-31. PubMed ID: 25980193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The expert witness in medical malpractice litigation: through the looking glass.
    Johnston JC; Sartwelle TP
    J Child Neurol; 2013 Apr; 28(4):484-501. PubMed ID: 23504251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [The physician as medical expert in legal procedures].
    Leenen HJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Feb; 137(8):419-23. PubMed ID: 8446202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. GA: is alleged negligence same as malpractice?: is expert medical testimony needed for negligence?
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Feb; 44(9):3. PubMed ID: 15038329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Malpractice in medical expert testimony].
    Paliege R
    Zentralbl Chir; 1977; 102(17):1074-8. PubMed ID: 919850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Federal administrative health courts are unconstitutional: a reply to Elliott, Narayan, and Nasmith.
    Widman A; Hochberg FA
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2008 Aug; 33(4):799-832. PubMed ID: 18617675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reliability and cogency of expert witness evidence in modern civil litigation.
    Stevens A
    Anaesthesia; 2011 Sep; 66(9):764-8. PubMed ID: 21831077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.