These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9149634)

  • 1. Reading and evaluating clinical review articles.
    Siwek J
    Am Fam Physician; 1997 May; 55(6):2064, 2069-70, 2072. PubMed ID: 9149634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reading and critically appraising systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a short primer with a focus on hepatology.
    Balk EM; Lau J; Bonis PA
    J Hepatol; 2005 Oct; 43(4):729-36. PubMed ID: 16120472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A model for critical review of literature - with vaginismus as an example.
    Wijma B; Engman M; Wijma K
    J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Mar; 28(1):21-36. PubMed ID: 17454511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Understanding statistical terms. 5. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Drug Ther Bull; 2009 Aug; 47(8):95-6. PubMed ID: 19654420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Guides for reading and interpreting systematic reviews: I. Getting started.
    Klassen TP; Jadad AR; Moher D
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 1998 Jul; 152(7):700-4. PubMed ID: 9667544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Further statistics in dentistry Part 8: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Petrie A; Bulman JS; Osborn JF
    Br Dent J; 2003 Jan; 194(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 12577072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do clinical experts rely on the Cochrane library?
    Grimes DA; Hou MY; Lopez LM; Nanda K
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Feb; 111(2 Pt 1):420-2. PubMed ID: 18238981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Clinical decision-making: systematic reviews and meta-analysis].
    Fernández Pérez C
    Neurologia; 2003 Mar; 18(2):70-3. PubMed ID: 12610756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The reporting quality of meta-analyses improves: a random sampling study.
    Wen J; Ren Y; Wang L; Li Y; Liu Y; Zhou M; Liu P; Ye L; Li Y; Tian W
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):770-5. PubMed ID: 18411041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How to use a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
    Tseng TY; Dahm P; Poolman RW; Preminger GM; Canales BJ; Montori VM
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1249-56. PubMed ID: 18707741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The meta-analysis of clinical studies: the philosopher's stone or a bone of contention?].
    Baumann M
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1999 Apr; 175 Suppl 1():17-20. PubMed ID: 10230453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Getting the most from review articles: a guide for readers and writers.
    Shaughnessy AF; Slawson DC
    Am Fam Physician; 1997 May; 55(6):2155-60. PubMed ID: 9149643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Meta-analysis is a good help for literature review. It makes the analysis of earlier studies more efficient and more objective].
    Ahlbom A; Adami HO
    Lakartidningen; 1999 Jan; 96(3):148-9. PubMed ID: 9951225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Problems with meta-analysis.
    Herbison P
    N Z Med J; 1999 Feb; 112(1081):38-41. PubMed ID: 10078215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Schlesselman JJ; Collins JA
    Semin Reprod Med; 2003 Feb; 21(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 12806564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
    Akobeng AK
    Arch Dis Child; 2005 Aug; 90(8):845-8. PubMed ID: 16040886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Meta-analysis: the science of review in Neurology].
    Allam MF; Del Castillo AS; Navajas RF
    Rev Neurol; 2005 Feb 16-28; 40(4):222-8. PubMed ID: 15765317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Not another meta-analysis!
    Mayo N; Asano M
    Mult Scler; 2009 Apr; 15(4):409-11. PubMed ID: 19324978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Meta-analysis of therapeutic trials. Risk of underestimating specific effects].
    Norlin K
    Lakartidningen; 1999 May; 96(19):2332. PubMed ID: 10377677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.