These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9149646)

  • 1. Vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery.
    Paluska SA
    Am Fam Physician; 1997 May; 55(6):2197-203. PubMed ID: 9149646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cohort study of Silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: II. Unsuccessful vacuum extraction.
    Berkus MD; Ramamurthy RS; O'Connor PS; Brown KJ; Hayashi RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Nov; 68(5):662-6. PubMed ID: 3763080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Assisted vaginal delivery using the vacuum extractor in frank breech presentation].
    Broche DE; Riethmuller D; Maticot-Baptista D; Ramanah R; Cossa S; Maillet R
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Apr; 37(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 18023998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cohort study of silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: I. Safety of the instrument.
    Berkus MD; Ramamurthy RS; O'Connor PS; Brown K; Hayashi RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Oct; 66(4):503-9. PubMed ID: 3900836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes.
    Gardella C; Taylor M; Benedetti T; Hitti J; Critchlow C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):896-902. PubMed ID: 11641674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Operative vaginal delivery: a comparison of forceps and vacuum for success rate and risk of rectal sphincter injury.
    Damron DP; Capeless EL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Sep; 191(3):907-10. PubMed ID: 15467563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vacuum assisted delivery in Ecuador for prolonged second stage of labor: maternal-neonatal outcome.
    Chang X; Chedraui P; Ross MG; Hidalgo L; Peñafiel J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 May; 20(5):381-4. PubMed ID: 17674241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cord blood acid-base status in neonates delivered by Silastic vacuum cup extraction: comparison with forceps and spontaneous deliveries.
    Gray DL; Nelson DM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Jan; 71(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 3122140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assisted vaginal delivery using the vacuum extractor.
    Putta LV; Spencer JP
    Am Fam Physician; 2000 Sep; 62(6):1316-20. PubMed ID: 11011860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of forceps and vacuum-assisted deliveries.
    Johnson JH; Figueroa R; Garry D; Elimian A; Maulik D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 103(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 14990415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vacuum-assisted delivery: a review.
    McQuivey RW
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Sep; 16(3):171-80. PubMed ID: 15590444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomised prospective study comparing the new vacuum extractor policy with forceps delivery.
    Johanson RB; Rice C; Doyle M; Arthur J; Anyanwu L; Ibrahim J; Warwick A; Redman CW; O'Brien PM
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Jun; 100(6):524-30. PubMed ID: 8334086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neonatal subgaleal hemorrhage and its relationship to delivery by vacuum extraction.
    Uchil D; Arulkumaran S
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2003 Oct; 58(10):687-93. PubMed ID: 14515066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short-term maternal and neonatal outcomes by mode of delivery. A case-controlled study.
    Benedetto C; Marozio L; Prandi G; Roccia A; Blefari S; Fabris C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Nov; 135(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 17126475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Operative vaginal delivery at Port Moresby General Hospital from 1977 to 2010.
    Mola GD; Kuk J
    P N G Med J; 2011; 54(3-4):174-84. PubMed ID: 24494514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Silastic cup vacuum extractor or forceps: a comparative study.
    Svigos JM; Cave DG; Vigneswaran R; Resch A; Christiansen J
    Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol; 1990 Dec; 16(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 2099728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of "instrument-associated" and "spontaneous" obstetric depressed skull fractures in a cohort of 68 neonates.
    Dupuis O; Silveira R; Dupont C; Mottolese C; Kahn P; Dittmar A; Rudigoz RC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jan; 192(1):165-70. PubMed ID: 15672020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Choice of instrument for vaginal delivery.
    Johanson R
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Dec; 9(6):361-5. PubMed ID: 9425578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trends in operative vaginal delivery rates and associated maternal complication rates in an inner-city hospital.
    Kabiru WN; Jamieson D; Graves W; Lindsay M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 May; 184(6):1112-4. PubMed ID: 11349172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.