These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9150170)

  • 1. Optimal strategies for mapping complex diseases in the presence of multiple loci.
    Goldgar DE; Easton DF
    Am J Hum Genet; 1997 May; 60(5):1222-32. PubMed ID: 9150170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimal ascertainment strategies to detect linkage to common disease alleles.
    Badner JA; Gershon ES; Goldin LR
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Sep; 63(3):880-8. PubMed ID: 9718337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multilocus linkage tests based on affected relative pairs.
    Cordell HJ; Wedig GC; Jacobs KB; Elston RC
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1273-86. PubMed ID: 10729111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A unified sampling approach for multipoint analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits in sib pairs.
    Liang KY; Huang CY; Beaty TH
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 May; 66(5):1631-41. PubMed ID: 10762548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors IV: joint pseudomarker analysis of linkage and/or linkage disequilibrium on a mixture of pedigrees and singletons when the mode of inheritance cannot be accurately specified.
    Göring HH; Terwilliger JD
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1310-27. PubMed ID: 10731466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Partitioned association-linkage test: distinguishing "necessary" from "susceptibility" loci.
    Greenberg DA; Doneshka P
    Genet Epidemiol; 1996; 13(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 8797007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Polygenic disease: methods for mapping complex disease traits.
    Weeks DE; Lathrop GM
    Trends Genet; 1995 Dec; 11(12):513-9. PubMed ID: 8533170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identification of susceptibility loci contributing to a complex disease using conventional segregation, linkage, and association methods.
    Falk CT; Ashley A; Lamb N; Sherman SL
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):601-6. PubMed ID: 8787980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adequacy of single-locus approximations for linkage analyses of oligogenic traits: extension to multigenerational pedigree structures.
    Vieland VJ; Greenberg DA; Hodge SE
    Hum Hered; 1993; 43(6):329-36. PubMed ID: 8288263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Linkage analysis of a common oligogenic disease using selected sib pairs.
    Cardon LR; Fulker DW; Cherny SS
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):741-6. PubMed ID: 8788002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-locus models of disease: comparison of likelihood and nonparametric linkage methods.
    Goldin LR; Weeks DE
    Am J Hum Genet; 1993 Oct; 53(4):908-15. PubMed ID: 8213819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genomewide transmission/disequilibrium testing--consideration of the genotypic relative risks at disease loci.
    Camp NJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 1997 Dec; 61(6):1424-30. PubMed ID: 9399906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A robust identity-by-descent procedure using affected sib pairs: multipoint mapping for complex diseases.
    Liang KY; Chiu YF; Beaty TH
    Hum Hered; 2001; 51(1-2):64-78. PubMed ID: 11096273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relationship between the sibling recurrence-risk ratio and genotype relative risk.
    Rybicki BA; Elston RC
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Feb; 66(2):593-604. PubMed ID: 10677319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two-trait-locus linkage analysis: a powerful strategy for mapping complex genetic traits.
    Schork NJ; Boehnke M; Terwilliger JD; Ott J
    Am J Hum Genet; 1993 Nov; 53(5):1127-36. PubMed ID: 8213836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Designs of reference families for the construction of genetic linkage maps.
    Da Y; VanRaden PM; Li N; Beattie CW; Wu C; Schook LB
    Anim Biotechnol; 1998; 9(3):205-28. PubMed ID: 9914814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Information provided by pairs of distantly affected relatives to search for genes involved in rare autosomal dominant diseases.
    Génin E; Bellis G; Clerget-Darpoux F
    Ann Hum Genet; 1997 Jan; 61(Pt 1):25-36. PubMed ID: 9066925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effective sib-pair designs in the mapping of quantitative-trait loci.
    Zhao H; Zhang H; Rotter JI
    Am J Hum Genet; 1997 May; 60(5):1211-21. PubMed ID: 9150169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multipoint linkage analysis using sib pairs: an interval mapping approach for dichotomous outcomes.
    Olson JM
    Am J Hum Genet; 1995 Mar; 56(3):788-98. PubMed ID: 7887435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two-locus disease models with two marker loci: the power of affected-sib-pair tests.
    Knapp M; Seuchter SA; Baur MP
    Am J Hum Genet; 1994 Nov; 55(5):1030-41. PubMed ID: 7977340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.