These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9150583)

  • 1. How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect.
    van den Bos K; Lind EA; Vermunt R; Wilke HA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1997 May; 72(5):1034-46. PubMed ID: 9150583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward understanding why fairness matters: the influence of mortality salience on reactions to procedural fairness.
    van den Bos K; Miedema J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2000 Sep; 79(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 10981839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uncertainty management: the influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness.
    van den Bos K
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2001 Jun; 80(6):931-41. PubMed ID: 11414375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trust in decision-making authorities dictates the form of the interactive relationship between outcome fairness and procedural fairness.
    Bianchi EC; Brockner J; van den Bos K; Seifert M; Moon H; van Dijke M; De Cremer D
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Jan; 41(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 25387762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Procedural justice and status: status salience as antecedent of procedural fairness effects.
    van Prooijen JW; van den Bos K; Wilke HA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Dec; 83(6):1353-61. PubMed ID: 12500817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Of different minds: an accessible identity model of justice reasoning.
    Skitka LJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2003; 7(4):286-97. PubMed ID: 14633468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Justice within social dilemmas.
    Schroeder DA; Steel JE; Woodell AJ; Bembenek AF
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2003; 7(4):375-87. PubMed ID: 14633473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cognitive bias in procedural justice: formation and implications of illusory correlations in perceived intergroup fairness.
    Stroessner SJ; Heuer LB
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1996 Oct; 71(4):717-28. PubMed ID: 8888600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of trust in authority and procedural fairness on cooperation.
    De Cremer D; Tyler TR
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 May; 92(3):639-49. PubMed ID: 17484547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fairness heuristics and substitutability effects: inferring the fairness of outcomes, procedures, and interpersonal treatment when employees lack clear information.
    Qin X; Ren R; Zhang ZX; Johnson RE
    J Appl Psychol; 2015 May; 100(3):749-66. PubMed ID: 25365727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reactions to others' mistakes: an empirical test of fairness theory.
    Williams KJ; Nicklin JM
    J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 143(5):533-58. PubMed ID: 19943403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Procedural fairness, outcome favorability, and judgments of an authority's responsibility.
    Brockner J; Fishman AY; Reb J; Goldman B; Spiegel S; Garden C
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Nov; 92(6):1657-71. PubMed ID: 18020803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Justice orientation as a moderator of the framing effect on procedural justice perception.
    Sasaki H; Hayashi Y
    J Soc Psychol; 2014; 154(3):251-63. PubMed ID: 24873027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Applicants' reactions to the fairness of selection procedures: the effects of positive rule violations and time of measurement.
    Ployhart RE; Ryan AM
    J Appl Psychol; 1998 Feb; 83(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 9494438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What's fair is fair--or is it? Value differences underlying public views about social justice.
    Rasinski KA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1987 Jul; 53(1):201-11. PubMed ID: 3612490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Relationship between Just World Beliefs and Life Satisfaction.
    Harding WG; McConatha JT; Kumar VK
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Sep; 17(17):. PubMed ID: 32899134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distributive justice, procedural justice, and psychological distress: the moderating effect of coworker support and work autonomy.
    Rousseau V; Salek S; Aubé C; Morin EM
    J Occup Health Psychol; 2009 Jul; 14(3):305-17. PubMed ID: 19586224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: interactive effects of outcomes and procedures.
    Brockner J; Wiesenfeld BM
    Psychol Bull; 1996 Sep; 120(2):189-208. PubMed ID: 8831296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Teachers' legitimacy: Effects of justice perception and social comparison processes.
    Gouveia-Pereira M; Vala J; Correia I
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2017 Mar; 87(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 27743388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fairness heuristic theory: valid but not empirical.
    Arnadóttir SP
    Scand J Psychol; 2002 Sep; 43(4):353-62. PubMed ID: 12361103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.