These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9151181)

  • 1. Changes in bone mineral density around a stable uncemented total hip arthroplasty.
    Korovessis P; Piperos G; Michael A; Baikousis A; Stamatakis M
    Int Orthop; 1997; 21(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 9151181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Course of bone mineral content changes around cementless Zweymueller total hip arthroplasty. A 4-year follow-up study.
    Korovessis P; Droutsas P; Piperos G; Michael A; Baikousis A; Stamatakis M
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 1997; 116(1-2):60-5. PubMed ID: 9006768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Periprosthetic bone mineral density after Mueller and Zweymueller total hip arthroplasties.
    Korovessis P; Piperos G; Michael A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Dec; (309):214-21. PubMed ID: 7994964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Periprosthetic bone turnover after primary total hip arthroplasty measured by single-photon emission computed tomography.
    Venesmaa P; Vanninen E; Miettinen H; Kröger H
    Scand J Surg; 2012; 101(4):241-8. PubMed ID: 23238498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bone remodelling in the proximal femur after Charnley total hip arthroplasty.
    Cohen B; Rushton N
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1995 Sep; 77(5):815-9. PubMed ID: 7559717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Periprosthetic bone remodeling around short stem.
    Synder M; Krajewski K; Sibinski M; Drobniewski M
    Orthopedics; 2015 Mar; 38(3 Suppl):S40-5. PubMed ID: 25826631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A seven-zone rating system for assessing bone mineral density after hip resurfacing using implants with metaphyseal femoral stems.
    Naal FD; Zuercher P; Munzinger U; Hersche O; Leunig M
    Hip Int; 2011; 21(4):463-7. PubMed ID: 22167855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical, radiographic, and scintigraphic comparison of the mechanical stability of Mueller and Zweymueller total hip prostheses.
    Stamatakis M; Korovessis P; Mastorakou A; Profanti M; Soukakos PN
    Orthopedics; 1999 Nov; 22(11):1037-43. PubMed ID: 10580822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. No adverse effects of early weight bearing after uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a randomized study of 20 patients.
    Bodén H; Adolphson P
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2004 Feb; 75(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 15022801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adaptive Bone Remodeling of the Femoral Bone After Tumor Resection Arthroplasty With an Uncemented Proximally Hydroxyapatite-Coated Stem.
    Andersen MR; Petersen MM
    J Clin Densitom; 2016; 19(2):202-7. PubMed ID: 25843447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in proximal femoral bone mineral density around a hydroxyapatite-coated hip joint arthroplasty.
    Theis JC; Beadel G
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2003 Jun; 11(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 12810972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Periprosthetic bone loss and regional bone turnover in uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study using high resolution single photon emission tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Kröger H; Vanninen E; Overmyer M; Miettinen H; Rushton N; Suomalainen O
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Mar; 12(3):487-92. PubMed ID: 9076593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bone loss around 2 different types of hip prostheses.
    Spittlehouse AJ; Smith TW; Eastell R
    J Arthroplasty; 1998 Jun; 13(4):422-7. PubMed ID: 9645523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bone restoration with cemented Exeter universal stem - Three-years longitudinal DEXA study in 165 hips for femur.
    Morita D; Iwase T; Ito T
    J Orthop Sci; 2016 May; 21(3):336-41. PubMed ID: 26952390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Periprosthetic bone remodelling of two types of uncemented femoral implant with proximal hydroxyapatite coating: a 3-year follow-up study addressing the influence of prosthesis design and preoperative bone density on periprosthetic bone loss.
    Rahmy AI; Gosens T; Blake GM; Tonino A; Fogelman I
    Osteoporos Int; 2004 Apr; 15(4):281-9. PubMed ID: 14661072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Is there a bone-preserving bone remodelling in short-stem prosthesis? DEXA analysis with the Nanos total hip arthroplasty].
    Götze C; Ehrenbrink J; Ehrenbrink H
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Aug; 148(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 20714981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in bone mineral density of the acetabulum and proximal femur after total hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Huang Q; Shen B; Yang J; Zhou ZK; Kang PD; Pei FX
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Dec; 28(10):1811-5. PubMed ID: 23618750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Precision of the measurements of periprosthetic bone mineral density in hips with a custom-made femoral stem.
    Martini F; Lebherz C; Mayer F; Leichtle U; Kremling E; Sell S
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2000 Sep; 82(7):1065-71. PubMed ID: 11041603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decreased femoral periprosthetic bone mineral density: a comparative study using DXA in patients after cementless total hip arthroplasty with osteonecrosis of the femoral head versus primary osteoarthritis.
    Craiovan B; Woerner M; Winkler S; Springorum HR; Grifka J; Renkawitz T; Keshmiri A
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2016 May; 136(5):709-13. PubMed ID: 26891850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Periprosthetic BMD after cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a 10-year follow-up study.
    Tapaninen T; Kröger H; Venesmaa P
    J Orthop Sci; 2015 Jul; 20(4):657-62. PubMed ID: 25850905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.