144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9151602)
1. Radiographic evaluation of mandibular posterior implant sites: correlation between panoramic and tomographic determinations.
Bolin A; Eliasson S; von Beetzen M; Jansson L
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1996 Dec; 7(4):354-9. PubMed ID: 9151602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry.
Güler AU; Sumer M; Sumer P; Biçer I
J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Oct; 32(10):741-6. PubMed ID: 16159352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Panoramic and tomographic dimensional determinations for maxillary osseointegrated implants. Comparison of the morphologic information potential of two and three dimensional radiographic systems.
Bolin A; Eliasson S
Swed Dent J; 1995; 19(1-2):65-71. PubMed ID: 7597633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiomorphometric indices and their relation to alveolar bone loss in completely edentulous Turkish patients: a retrospective study.
Yüzügüllü B; Gulsahi A; Imirzalioglu P
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Mar; 101(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 19231567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of panoramic radiographs in the preoperative planning of posterior mandibular implants: a prospective clinical study of 1527 consecutively treated patients.
Vazquez L; Saulacic N; Belser U; Bernard JP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 17956572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk assessment before extraction for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a computerized tomographic scan study.
Froum S; Casanova L; Byrne S; Cho SC
J Periodontol; 2011 Mar; 82(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 20809864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Study on the necessity for cross-section imaging of the posterior mandible for treatment planning of standard cases in implant dentistry.
Frei C; Buser D; Dula K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):490-7. PubMed ID: 15248885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Morphology of the mandibular cortex on panoramic radiographs as an indicator of bone quality.
Klemetti E; Kolmakow S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jan; 26(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 9446986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of vertical height measurements on direct digital panoramic radiographs using posterior mandibular implants and metal balls as reference objects.
Vazquez L; Nizamaldin Y; Combescure C; Nedir R; Bischof M; Dohan Ehrenfest DM; Carrel JP; Belser UC
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(2):20110429. PubMed ID: 23360688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative assessment of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones in panoramic radiographs of elderly dentate and edentulous subjects.
Xie Q; Wolf J; Ainamo A
Acta Odontol Scand; 1997 Jun; 55(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 9226425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A radiographic evaluation of cervical bone loss associated with immediate and delayed implants placed for fixed restorations in edentulous jaws.
Schwartz-Arad D; Yaniv Y; Levin L; Kaffe I
J Periodontol; 2004 May; 75(5):652-7. PubMed ID: 15212346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones in panoramic radiographs of dentate and edentulous subjects.
Sağlam AA
Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):433-8. PubMed ID: 12073724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trabecular bone pattern of the mandible. Comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography.
Taguchi A; Tanimoto K; Akagawa Y; Suei Y; Wada T; Rohlin M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Mar; 26(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 9442622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Height of mandibular basal bone in dentate and edentulous subjects.
Xie Q; Wolf J; Soikkonen K; Ainamo A
Acta Odontol Scand; 1996 Dec; 54(6):379-83. PubMed ID: 8997437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Linear tomography in conjunction with pantomography in the assessment of dental implant recipient sites.
Silverstein LH; Melkonian RW; Kurtzman D; Garnick JJ; Lefkove MD
J Oral Implantol; 1994; 20(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 7869413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of mental foramen position from panoramic dental radiographs.
Ajmal M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Jul; 15(4):399-402. PubMed ID: 25576102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning.
Lam EW; Ruprecht A; Yang J
J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jul; 74(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 7674189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implant site assessment using panoramic cross-sectional tomographic imaging.
Potter BJ; Shrout MK; Russell CM; Sharawy M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Oct; 84(4):436-42. PubMed ID: 9347511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation between planned prosthetic and residual bone trajectories in dental implants.
Almog DM; Sanchez R
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):562-7. PubMed ID: 10220660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does mandibular edentulous bone height affect prosthetic treatment success?
Pan S; Dagenais M; Thomason JM; Awad M; Emami E; Kimoto S; Wollin SD; Feine JS
J Dent; 2010 Nov; 38(11):899-907. PubMed ID: 20708062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
