These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9151605)

  • 41. Implant treatment without bone grafting in severely resorbed edentulous maxillae.
    Mattsson T; Köndell PA; Gynther GW; Fredholm U; Bolin A
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Mar; 57(3):281-7. PubMed ID: 10077198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Onlay bone grafting to the anterior maxilla: preparation for placement of implants.
    Smiler DG
    Int J Dent Symp; 1994; 2(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 9117847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Lateral augmentation of the maxilla and mandible using framework technique with allogeneic bone grafts.
    Wallowy P; Dorow A
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Dec; 38(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 22103815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Bone grafts and Brånemark implants in the treatment of the severely resorbed maxilla: a 2-year longitudinal study.
    Nystrom E; Kahnberg KE; Gunne J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1993; 8(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 8468086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Implant treatment in edentulous maxillae: a 5-year follow-up report on patients with different degrees of jaw resorption.
    Jemt T; Lekholm U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 7615326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The management of a severely resorbed edentulous maxilla using a bone graft and a CAD/CAM-guided immediately loaded definitive implant prosthesis: a clinical report.
    Cheng AC; Tee-Khin N; Siew-Luen C; Lee H; Wee AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 18262007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Reconstruction of the severely atrophic mandible using autologous calvarial bone graft: an " inverted sandwich" graft technique and dental rehabilitation with fixed implant-supported prostheses.
    Cuesta Gil M; Bucci T; Duarte Ruiz B; Riba García F
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 38(5):379-84. PubMed ID: 19910205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Implant rehabilitation of the atrophic upper jaw: a review of the literature since 1999.
    Sorní M; Guarinós J; García O; Peñarrocha M
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2005 Apr; 10 Suppl 1():E45-56. PubMed ID: 15800467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Histological and clinical evaluation of 3 different grafting materials for sinus lifting procedure based on 8 cases.
    Karabuda C; Ozdemir O; Tosun T; Anil A; Olgaç V
    J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1436-42. PubMed ID: 11699487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Stability of bone grafting and placement of implants in the severely atrophic maxilla.
    Reinert S; König S; Bremerich A; Eufinger H; Krimmel M
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Aug; 41(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 12946668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Augmentation in two stages of atrophic alveolar bone prior to dental rehabilitation: a case report.
    Zahrani AA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Sep; 8(6):57-63. PubMed ID: 17846672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Autologous bone grafts and endosseous implants: complementary techniques.
    Triplett RG; Schow SR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1996 Apr; 54(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 8600266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Rehabilitation of the resorbed maxilla and mandible using autogenous bone grafts and osseointegrated implants.
    Williamson RA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(4):476-88. PubMed ID: 8803343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Reconstruction of an atrophic maxilla: comparison of two methods.
    van der Mark EL; Bierenbroodspot F; Baas EM; de Lange J
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 49(3):198-202. PubMed ID: 20403652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Use of crestal bone for augmentation of extremely knife-edged alveolar ridges prior to implant placement: report of 3 cases.
    Bernhart T; Weber R; Mailath G; Ulm C; Dörtbudak O; Watzek G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(3):424-7. PubMed ID: 10379117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Clinical radiographic, and histologic evaluation of maxillary bone reconstruction by using a titanium mesh and autogenous iliac graft: a case report.
    Lozada J; Proussaefs P
    J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 12498457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Long-term assessment (5 to 71 months) of endosseous dental implants placed in the augmented maxillary sinus.
    Olson JW; Dent CD; Morris HF; Ochi S
    Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):152-6. PubMed ID: 11885175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Reconstruction of the severely resorbed (Class VI) jaws: routine or exception?
    Joos U; Kleinheinz J
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2000 Feb; 28(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 10851666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Bone graft remodelling and implant success rate in the treatment of the severely resorbed maxilla: a 5-year longitudinal study.
    Nyström E; Ahlqvist J; Legrell PE; Kahnberg KE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Apr; 31(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 12102413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A histomorphometric comparison of the bone graft-titanium interface between interpositional and onlay/inlay bone grafting techniques.
    Sjöström M; Lundgren S; Sennerby L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 16519182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.