These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9151637)

  • 21. [Preoperative planning for the placement of a single implant].
    Jacobs R
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1999 May; 106(5):187-90. PubMed ID: 11930365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Augmentation in two stages of atrophic alveolar bone prior to dental rehabilitation: a case report.
    Zahrani AA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Sep; 8(6):57-63. PubMed ID: 17846672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Magnetic resonance tomography for planning dental implantation].
    Hassfeld S; Fiebach J; Widmann S; Heiland S; Mühling J
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2001 May; 5(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 11432335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Magnetic resonance imaging: a useful tool for evaluation of bone prior to implant surgery.
    Gray CF; Redpath TW; Smith FW
    Br Dent J; 1998 Jun; 184(12):603-7. PubMed ID: 9682562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging compared with computed tomography for implant planning.
    Aguiar MF; Marques AP; Carvalho AC; Cavalcanti MG
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Apr; 19(4):362-5. PubMed ID: 18266874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Precise site location for implants using CT scans: a technical note.
    Sethi A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1993; 8(4):433-8. PubMed ID: 8270313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A tomographic technique for the depiction of atrophied alveolar ridges prior to endosseous implant placement.
    Weingart D; Düker J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 8508941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A method for estimating preoperative bone volume for implant surgery.
    Flanagan D
    J Oral Implantol; 2000; 26(4):262-6. PubMed ID: 11831232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Low-field magnetic resonance imaging for implant dentistry.
    Gray CF; Redpath TW; Smith FW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jul; 27(4):225-9. PubMed ID: 9780900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Magnetic resonance imaging in zirconia-based dental implantology.
    Duttenhoefer F; Mertens ME; Vizkelety J; Gremse F; Stadelmann VA; Sauerbier S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Oct; 26(10):1195-202. PubMed ID: 24893967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Computed tomography in dental implantation surgery.
    Schwarz MS; Rothman SL; Chafetz N; Rhodes M
    Dent Clin North Am; 1989 Oct; 33(4):555-97. PubMed ID: 2680653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Imaging for predictable maxillary implants.
    Duckmanton NA; Austin BW; Lechner SK; Klineberg IJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 8179788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Preimplant radiographic assessment of available maxillary bone support. Comparison of tomographic and panoramic technique.
    Fredholm U; Bolin A; Andersson L
    Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 8356535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Panoramic and tomographic dimensional determinations for maxillary osseointegrated implants. Comparison of the morphologic information potential of two and three dimensional radiographic systems.
    Bolin A; Eliasson S
    Swed Dent J; 1995; 19(1-2):65-71. PubMed ID: 7597633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Presurgical tomographic assessment for dental implants. 1. A modified imaging technique.
    Poon CK; Barss TK; Murdoch-Kinch CA; Bricker SL; Miles DA; Van Dis ML
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1992; 7(2):246-50. PubMed ID: 1398842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of four different optimized magnetic-resonance-imaging sequences for visualization of dental and maxillo-mandibular structures at 3 T.
    Assaf AT; Zrnc TA; Remus CC; Schönfeld M; Habermann CR; Riecke B; Friedrich RE; Fiehler J; Heiland M; Sedlacik J
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1356-63. PubMed ID: 24837485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Advanced imaging: Magnetic resonance imaging in implant dentistry.
    Gray CF; Redpath TW; Smith FW; Staff RT
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2003 Feb; 14(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 12562361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Imaging technique selection for the preoperative planning of oral implants: a review of the literature.
    BouSerhal C; Jacobs R; Quirynen M; van Steenberghe D
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2002; 4(3):156-72. PubMed ID: 12516649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of dose reduction on multi-detector computed tomographic images in evaluating the maxilla and mandible for pre-surgical implant planning: a cadaveric study.
    Koizumi H; Sur J; Seki K; Nakajima K; Sano T; Okano T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Aug; 21(8):830-4. PubMed ID: 20666797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A common sense approach to TMJ and implant imaging.
    Scarfe WC
    Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 1998 Oct; 14():48-61. PubMed ID: 10895612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.