295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9152444)
1. An experimental study of a combination method using a pedicle screw and laminar hook for the osteoporotic spine.
Hasegawa K; Takahashi HE; Uchiyama S; Hirano T; Hara T; Washio T; Sugiura T; Youkaichiya M; Ikeda M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 May; 22(9):958-62; discussion 963. PubMed ID: 9152444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A biomechanical assessment of infra-laminar hooks as an alternative to supra-laminar hooks in thoracolumbar fixation.
Murakami H; Tsai KJ; Attallah-Wasif ES; Yamazaki K; Shimamura T; Hutton WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(9):967-71. PubMed ID: 16641771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Short-segment pedicle instrumentation. Biomechanical analysis of supplemental hook fixation.
Chiba M; McLain RF; Yerby SA; Moseley TA; Smith TS; Benson DR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Feb; 21(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 8742203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A pedicle screw system and a lamina hook system provide similar primary and long-term stability: a biomechanical in vitro study with quasi-static and dynamic loading conditions.
Wilke HJ; Kaiser D; Volkheimer D; Hackenbroch C; Püschel K; Rauschmann M
Eur Spine J; 2016 Sep; 25(9):2919-28. PubMed ID: 27405823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An experimental study on the interface strength between titanium mesh cage and vertebra in reference to vertebral bone mineral density.
Hasegawa K; Abe M; Washio T; Hara T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Apr; 26(8):957-63. PubMed ID: 11317121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Krag versus Caudad trajectory technique for pedicle screw insertion in osteoporotic vertebrae: biomechanical comparison and analysis.
Yuan Q; Han X; Han X; He D; Liu B; Tian W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Dec; 39(26 Spec No.):B27-35. PubMed ID: 25504099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of the degree of osteoporosis on the biomechanical anchoring strength of the sacral pedicle screws: an in vitro comparison between unaugmented bicortical screws and polymethylmethacrylate augmented unicortical screws.
Zhuang XM; Yu BS; Zheng ZM; Zhang JF; Lu WW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E925-31. PubMed ID: 20098349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw thread differential design in an osteoporotic cadaver model.
Mehta H; Santos E; Ledonio C; Sembrano J; Ellingson A; Pare P; Murrell B; Nuckley DJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Mar; 27(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 22071427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Biomechanical study on effects of bone mineral density on fixation strength of expansive pedicle screw].
Gao M; Li X; Zhen P; Wu Z; Zhou S; Tian Q; Lei W
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 27(8):969-73. PubMed ID: 24171353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical Fixation Properties of the Cortical Bone Trajectory in the Osteoporotic Lumbar Spine.
Li HM; Zhang RJ; Gao H; Jia CY; Xing T; Zhang JX; Dong FL; Shen CL
World Neurosurg; 2018 Nov; 119():e717-e727. PubMed ID: 30092463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.
Burval DJ; McLain RF; Milks R; Inceoglu S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17471088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A titanium expandable pedicle screw improves initial pullout strength as compared with standard pedicle screws.
Vishnubhotla S; McGarry WB; Mahar AT; Gelb DE
Spine J; 2011 Aug; 11(8):777-81. PubMed ID: 21802996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical evaluation of the pedicle screw insertion depth effect on screw stability under cyclic loading and subsequent pullout.
Karami KJ; Buckenmeyer LE; Kiapour AM; Kelkar PS; Goel VK; Demetropoulos CK; Soo TM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Apr; 28(3):E133-9. PubMed ID: 25310387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pedicle screw augmentation with polyethylene tape: a biomechanical study in the osteoporotic thoracolumbar spine.
Hamasaki T; Tanaka N; Kim J; Okada M; Ochi M; Hutton WC
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Apr; 23(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 20051920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of different screw augmentation techniques and screw designs in osteoporotic spines.
Becker S; Chavanne A; Spitaler R; Kropik K; Aigner N; Ogon M; Redl H
Eur Spine J; 2008 Nov; 17(11):1462-9. PubMed ID: 18781342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.
Santoni BG; Hynes RA; McGilvray KC; Rodriguez-Canessa G; Lyons AS; Henson MA; Womack WJ; Puttlitz CM
Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):366-73. PubMed ID: 18790684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Revision of cannulated and perforated cement-augmented pedicle screws: a biomechanical study in human cadavers.
Bullmann V; Schmoelz W; Richter M; Grathwohl C; Schulte TL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E932-9. PubMed ID: 20508553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pedicle screw motion in the osteoporotic spine after augmentation with laminar hooks, sublaminar wires, or calcium phosphate cement: a comparative analysis.
Tan JS; Kwon BK; Dvorak MF; Fisher CG; Oxland TR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Aug; 29(16):1723-30. PubMed ID: 15303014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical effects of posterior pedicle screw-based instrumentation using titanium versus carbon fiber reinforced PEEK in an osteoporotic spine human cadaver model.
Oikonomidis S; Greven J; Bredow J; Eh M; Prescher A; Fischer H; Thüring J; Eysel P; Hildebrand F; Kobbe P; Scheyerer MJ; Herren C
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Dec; 80():105153. PubMed ID: 32829232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative biomechanical analysis of an improved novel pedicle screw with sheath and bone cement.
Takigawa T; Tanaka M; Konishi H; Ikuma H; Misawa H; Sugimoto Y; Nakanishi K; Kuramoto K; Nishida K; Ozaki T
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Aug; 20(6):462-7. PubMed ID: 17970188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
