These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9152447)

  • 1. Cervical pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws. Anatomic feasibility and biomechanical comparison.
    Jones EL; Heller JG; Silcox DH; Hutton WC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 May; 22(9):977-82. PubMed ID: 9152447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical study of screws in the lateral masses: variables affecting pull-out resistance.
    Heller JG; Estes BT; Zaouali M; Diop A
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Sep; 78(9):1315-21. PubMed ID: 8816645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cervical spine pedicle screws: a biomechanical comparison of two insertion techniques.
    Kowalski JM; Ludwig SC; Hutton WC; Heller JG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Nov; 25(22):2865-7. PubMed ID: 11074671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cervical pedicle screws vs. lateral mass screws: uniplanar fatigue analysis and residual pullout strengths.
    Johnston TL; Karaikovic EE; Lautenschlager EP; Marcu D
    Spine J; 2006; 6(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 17088197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical analysis of transpedicular screw fixation in the subaxial cervical spine.
    Kothe R; Rüther W; Schneider E; Linke B
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Sep; 29(17):1869-75. PubMed ID: 15534407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Placement of pedicle screws in the human cadaveric cervical spine: comparative accuracy of three techniques.
    Ludwig SC; Kramer DL; Balderston RA; Vaccaro AR; Foley KF; Albert TJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jul; 25(13):1655-67. PubMed ID: 10870141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pedicle and transverse process screws of the upper thoracic spine. Biomechanical comparison of loads to failure.
    Heller JG; Shuster JK; Hutton WC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Apr; 24(7):654-8. PubMed ID: 10209793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Paravertebral foramen screw fixation for posterior cervical spine fusion: biomechanical study and description of a novel technique.
    Maki S; Aramomi M; Matsuura Y; Furuya T; Ota M; Iijima Y; Saito J; Suzuki T; Mannoji C; Takahashi K; Yamazaki M; Koda M
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):415-420. PubMed ID: 28498072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cervical anterior transpedicular screw fixation (ATPS)--Part II. Accuracy of manual insertion and pull-out strength of ATPS.
    Koller H; Acosta F; Tauber M; Fox M; Martin H; Forstner R; Augat P; Penzkofer R; Pirich C; Kässmann H; Resch H; Hitzl W
    Eur Spine J; 2008 Apr; 17(4):539-55. PubMed ID: 18224357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using lamina screws as a salvage technique at C-7: computed tomography and biomechanical analysis using cadaveric vertebrae. Laboratory investigation.
    Cardoso MJ; Dmitriev AE; Helgeson MD; Stephens F; Campbell V; Lehman RA; Cooper P; Rosner MK
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Jul; 11(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 19569937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pedicle screws can be 4 times stronger than lateral mass screws for insertion in the midcervical spine: a biomechanical study on strength of fixation.
    Ito Z; Higashino K; Kato S; Kim SS; Wong E; Yoshioka K; Hutton WC
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Apr; 27(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22373932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical comparison of cervical transfacet pedicle screws versus pedicle screws.
    Liu GY; Xu RM; Ma WH; Sun SH; Huang L; Ying JW; Jiang WY
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Aug; 121(15):1390-3. PubMed ID: 18959115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Considerations for the use of C7 crossing laminar screws in subaxial and cervicothoracic instrumentation.
    Ilgenfritz RM; Gandhi AA; Fredericks DC; Grosland NM; Smucker JD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Feb; 38(4):E199-204. PubMed ID: 23169075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Which salvage fixation technique is best for the failed initial screw fixation at the cervicothoracic junction? A biomechanical comparison study.
    Hong JT; Tomoyuki T; Jain A; Orías AAE; Inoue N; An HS
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Sep; 26(9):2417-2424. PubMed ID: 28752245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of hubbing on the pull-out strength of lateral mass screws in the cervical spine: a biomechanical experiment.
    Koo KH; Yoon ST; Kim SB; Hutton WC
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Feb; 28(1):E45-8. PubMed ID: 25075989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical comparison of transarticular facet screws to lateral mass plates in two-level instrumentations of the cervical spine.
    DalCanto RA; Lieberman I; Inceoglu S; Kayanja M; Ferrara L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Apr; 30(8):897-2. PubMed ID: 15834333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acute and long-term stability of atlantoaxial fixation methods: a biomechanical comparison of pars, pedicle, and intralaminar fixation in an intact and odontoid fracture model.
    Dmitriev AE; Lehman RA; Helgeson MD; Sasso RC; Kuhns C; Riew DK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 19214095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Flexion failure of posterior cervical lateral mass screws. Influence of insertion technique and position.
    Choueka J; Spivak JM; Kummer FJ; Steger T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Feb; 21(4):462-8. PubMed ID: 8658250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anatomical considerations for cervical pedicle screw insertion: the use of multiplanar computerized tomography measurements in 122 consecutive clinical cases.
    Onibokun A; Khoo LT; Bistazzoni S; Chen NF; Sassi M
    Spine J; 2009 Sep; 9(9):729-34. PubMed ID: 19699462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of pedicle and lateral mass screw construct stiffnesses at the cervicothoracic junction: a biomechanical study.
    Rhee JM; Kraiwattanapong C; Hutton WC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Nov; 30(21):E636-40. PubMed ID: 16261101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.