107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9153010)
1. Multi-MUP EMG analysis in clinical routine.
Falck B; Stålberg E; Stålberg S; Aström M
Neurol Neurochir Pol; 1996; 30 Suppl 3():55-70. PubMed ID: 9153010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multi-MUP EMG analysis--a two year experience in daily clinical work.
Stålberg E; Falck B; Sonoo M; Stålberg S; Aström M
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1995 Jun; 97(3):145-54. PubMed ID: 7607102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of conventional and decomposition-enhanced spike triggered averaging techniques.
Lawson VH; Bromberg MB; Stashuk D
Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Mar; 115(3):564-8. PubMed ID: 15036051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Size of motor unit potential sample.
Podnar S; Mrkaić M
Muscle Nerve; 2003 Feb; 27(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 12548527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Standardisation of anal sphincter EMG: high and low threshold motor units.
Podnar S; Vodusek DB
Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Aug; 110(8):1488-91. PubMed ID: 10454288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability of quantitative EMG analysis of the extensor carpi radialis muscle.
Calder KM; Agnew MJ; Stashuk DW; McLean L
J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Mar; 168(2):483-93. PubMed ID: 18053579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Decomposition-based quantitative electromyography: effect of force on motor unit potentials and motor unit number estimates.
Boe SG; Stashuk DW; Brown WF; Doherty TJ
Muscle Nerve; 2005 Mar; 31(3):365-73. PubMed ID: 15627267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. EMGLAB: an interactive EMG decomposition program.
McGill KC; Lateva ZC; Marateb HR
J Neurosci Methods; 2005 Dec; 149(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 16026846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. EMG signal decomposition using motor unit potential train validity.
Parsaei H; Stashuk DW
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2013 Mar; 21(2):265-74. PubMed ID: 23033332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of recording site within the muscle on motor unit potentials.
Falck B; Stålberg E; Bischoff C
Muscle Nerve; 1995 Dec; 18(12):1385-9. PubMed ID: 7477060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New attempts to quantify concentric needle electromyography.
Sonoo M
Muscle Nerve Suppl; 2002; 11():S98-S102. PubMed ID: 12116293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Decomposition-based quantitative electromyography: methods and initial normative data in five muscles.
Doherty TJ; Stashuk DW
Muscle Nerve; 2003 Aug; 28(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 12872325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of quantitative techniques in anal sphincter electromyography.
Podnar S; Vodusek DB; Stålberg E
Muscle Nerve; 2002 Jan; 25(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 11754189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spatial distribution of surface action potentials generated by individual motor units in the human biceps brachii muscle.
Rodriguez-Falces J; Negro F; Gonzalez-Izal M; Farina D
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2013 Aug; 23(4):766-77. PubMed ID: 23619102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The motor unit and quantitative electromyography.
Bromberg MB
Muscle Nerve; 2020 Feb; 61(2):131-142. PubMed ID: 31579956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Increased neuromuscular transmission instability and motor unit remodelling with diabetic neuropathy as assessed using novel near fibre motor unit potential parameters.
Allen MD; Stashuk DW; Kimpinski K; Doherty TJ; Hourigan ML; Rice CL
Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 126(4):794-802. PubMed ID: 25240249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adaptive motor unit potential train validation using MUP shape information.
Parsaei H; Stashuk DW
Med Eng Phys; 2011 Jun; 33(5):581-9. PubMed ID: 21269867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physiological characteristics of motor units in the brachioradialis muscle across fatiguing low-level isometric contractions.
Calder KM; Stashuk DW; McLean L
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2008 Feb; 18(1):2-15. PubMed ID: 17113787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved MUP Template Estimation Using Local Time Warping and Kernel Weighted Averaging.
Hamilton-Wright A; Stashuk DW
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():2647-2650. PubMed ID: 30440951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Usefulness of an increase in size of motor unit potential sample.
Podnar S
Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jul; 115(7):1683-8. PubMed ID: 15203070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
