These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9154257)

  • 21. Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in 'meta-epidemiological' research.
    Sterne JA; Jüni P; Schulz KF; Altman DG; Bartlett C; Egger M
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1513-24. PubMed ID: 12111917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How to interpret a meta-analysis and judge its value as a guide for clinical practice.
    Zlowodzki M; Poolman RW; Kerkhoffs GM; Tornetta P; Bhandari M;
    Acta Orthop; 2007 Oct; 78(5):598-609. PubMed ID: 17966018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Meta-analysis of repeated measures study designs.
    Peters JL; Mengersen KL
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):941-50. PubMed ID: 19018929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Meta-analysis based on standardized effects is unreliable.
    Cummings P
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2004 Jun; 158(6):595-7. PubMed ID: 15184227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Enhancing the validity and utility of randomized clinical trials in addictions treatment research: II. Participant samples and assessment.
    Del Boca FK; Darkes J
    Addiction; 2007 Aug; 102(8):1194-203. PubMed ID: 17511752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Deriving treatment recommendations from evidence within randomized trials. The role and limitation of meta-analysis.
    Freemantle N; Mason J; Eccles M
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1999; 15(2):304-15. PubMed ID: 10507190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Interpretation of clinical trial results.
    Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Nov; 90(5 Suppl):S114-20. PubMed ID: 19007606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Procedures that assess inconsistency in meta-analyses can assess the likelihood of response bias in multiwave surveys.
    Montori VM; Leung TW; Walter SD; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 58(8):856-8. PubMed ID: 16018920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Meta-analysis.
    Elliott AT
    Nucl Med Commun; 1994 Apr; 15(4):218-20. PubMed ID: 8072738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Meta-analyses in psychopharmacotherapy: garbage in--garbage out?].
    Weinmann S
    Psychiatr Prax; 2009 Sep; 36(6):255-7. PubMed ID: 19707997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reproducibility of results with homeopathic remedies.
    Buckman R
    CMAJ; 1999 Apr; 160(8):1128-9. PubMed ID: 10234340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quo vadis meta-analysis? A potentially dangerous tool if used without adequate rules.
    Michels KB
    Important Adv Oncol; 1992; ():243-8. PubMed ID: 1582676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Revise the review process of the Cochrane collaboration.
    Rosén M; Lindqvist R; Stenbeck M
    Scand J Public Health; 2002; 30(3):238-9. PubMed ID: 12227981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Meta-analysis in occupational epidemiology: a review of practice.
    McElvenny DM; Armstrong BG; Järup L; Higgins JP
    Occup Med (Lond); 2004 Aug; 54(5):336-44. PubMed ID: 15289591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Using linked meta-analysis to build policy models.
    Lipsey MW
    NIDA Res Monogr; 1997; 170():216-33. PubMed ID: 9154260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. How to practice and teach evidence-based medicine: role of the Cochrane Collaboration.
    Kleijnen J; Chalmers I
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl; 1997; 111():231-3. PubMed ID: 9421026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
    Ioannidis JP
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessing new interventions in women's health.
    Hills RK; Daniels J
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Oct; 20(5):713-28. PubMed ID: 16750935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Further statistics in dentistry Part 8: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Petrie A; Bulman JS; Osborn JF
    Br Dent J; 2003 Jan; 194(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 12577072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. On the validity of meta-analyses: exhaustivity must be warranted, exclusion of duplicate patients too.
    Pambrun E; Bouteloup V; Thiébaut R; Asselineau J; de Lédinghen V; Perez P;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):342-3. PubMed ID: 20079606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.