BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9154257)

  • 21. Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in 'meta-epidemiological' research.
    Sterne JA; Jüni P; Schulz KF; Altman DG; Bartlett C; Egger M
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1513-24. PubMed ID: 12111917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How to interpret a meta-analysis and judge its value as a guide for clinical practice.
    Zlowodzki M; Poolman RW; Kerkhoffs GM; Tornetta P; Bhandari M;
    Acta Orthop; 2007 Oct; 78(5):598-609. PubMed ID: 17966018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Meta-analysis of repeated measures study designs.
    Peters JL; Mengersen KL
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):941-50. PubMed ID: 19018929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Meta-analysis based on standardized effects is unreliable.
    Cummings P
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2004 Jun; 158(6):595-7. PubMed ID: 15184227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Enhancing the validity and utility of randomized clinical trials in addictions treatment research: II. Participant samples and assessment.
    Del Boca FK; Darkes J
    Addiction; 2007 Aug; 102(8):1194-203. PubMed ID: 17511752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Deriving treatment recommendations from evidence within randomized trials. The role and limitation of meta-analysis.
    Freemantle N; Mason J; Eccles M
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1999; 15(2):304-15. PubMed ID: 10507190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Interpretation of clinical trial results.
    Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Nov; 90(5 Suppl):S114-20. PubMed ID: 19007606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Procedures that assess inconsistency in meta-analyses can assess the likelihood of response bias in multiwave surveys.
    Montori VM; Leung TW; Walter SD; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 58(8):856-8. PubMed ID: 16018920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Meta-analysis.
    Elliott AT
    Nucl Med Commun; 1994 Apr; 15(4):218-20. PubMed ID: 8072738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Meta-analyses in psychopharmacotherapy: garbage in--garbage out?].
    Weinmann S
    Psychiatr Prax; 2009 Sep; 36(6):255-7. PubMed ID: 19707997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reproducibility of results with homeopathic remedies.
    Buckman R
    CMAJ; 1999 Apr; 160(8):1128-9. PubMed ID: 10234340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quo vadis meta-analysis? A potentially dangerous tool if used without adequate rules.
    Michels KB
    Important Adv Oncol; 1992; ():243-8. PubMed ID: 1582676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Revise the review process of the Cochrane collaboration.
    Rosén M; Lindqvist R; Stenbeck M
    Scand J Public Health; 2002; 30(3):238-9. PubMed ID: 12227981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Meta-analysis in occupational epidemiology: a review of practice.
    McElvenny DM; Armstrong BG; Järup L; Higgins JP
    Occup Med (Lond); 2004 Aug; 54(5):336-44. PubMed ID: 15289591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Using linked meta-analysis to build policy models.
    Lipsey MW
    NIDA Res Monogr; 1997; 170():216-33. PubMed ID: 9154260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. How to practice and teach evidence-based medicine: role of the Cochrane Collaboration.
    Kleijnen J; Chalmers I
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl; 1997; 111():231-3. PubMed ID: 9421026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
    Ioannidis JP
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessing new interventions in women's health.
    Hills RK; Daniels J
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Oct; 20(5):713-28. PubMed ID: 16750935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Further statistics in dentistry Part 8: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Petrie A; Bulman JS; Osborn JF
    Br Dent J; 2003 Jan; 194(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 12577072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. On the validity of meta-analyses: exhaustivity must be warranted, exclusion of duplicate patients too.
    Pambrun E; Bouteloup V; Thiébaut R; Asselineau J; de Lédinghen V; Perez P;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):342-3. PubMed ID: 20079606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.