132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9154494)
1. Appropriateness of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: comparison of American and Swiss criteria.
Vader JP; Burnand B; Froehlich F; Dupriez K; Larequi-Lauber T; Pache I; Dubois RW; Gonvers JJ; Brook RH
Int J Qual Health Care; 1997 Apr; 9(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 9154494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of panel-based guidelines for colonoscopy: an international comparison.
Burnand B; Vader JP; Froehlich F; Dupriez K; Larequi-Lauber T; Pache I; Dubois RW; Brook RH; Gonvers JJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 1998 Feb; 47(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 9512282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Appropriateness of surgery for sciatica: reliability of guidelines from expert panels.
Vader JP; Porchet F; Larequi-Lauber T; Dubois RW; Burnand B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jul; 25(14):1831-6. PubMed ID: 10888953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is the diagnostic yield of upper GI endoscopy improved by the use of explicit panel-based appropriateness criteria?
Froehlich F; Repond C; Müllhaupt B; Vader JP; Burnand B; Schneider C; Pache I; Thorens J; Rey JP; Debosset V; Wietlisbach V; Fried M; Dubois RW; Brook RH; Gonvers JJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Sep; 52(3):333-41. PubMed ID: 10968846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assigning appropriateness ratings for diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy using two different approaches.
Kahn KL; Park RE; Vennes J; Brook RH
Med Care; 1992 Nov; 30(11):1016-28. PubMed ID: 1434955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of appropriateness criteria for colonoscopy: comparison between a standardized expert panel and an evidence-based medicine approach.
Nicollier-Fahrni A; Vader JP; Froehlich F; Gonvers JJ; Burnand B
Int J Qual Health Care; 2003 Feb; 15(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 12630797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Appropriate treatment for Crohn's disease: methodology and summary results of a multidisciplinary international expert panel approach--EPACT.
Vader JP; Froehlich F; Juillerat P; Burnand B; Felley C; Gonvers JJ; Mottet C; Pittet V; Dubois RW; Wietlisbach V; Michetti P
Digestion; 2006; 73(4):237-48. PubMed ID: 16940727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of specialty and nationality on panel judgments of the appropriateness of coronary revascularization: a pilot study.
Bernstein SJ; Lázaro P; Fitch K; Aguilar MD; Kahan JP
Med Care; 2001 May; 39(5):513-20. PubMed ID: 11317099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Appropriateness of colorectal cancer screening: appraisal of evidence by experts.
Bridevaux IP; Silaghi AM; Vader JP; Froehlich F; Gonvers JJ; Burnand B
Int J Qual Health Care; 2006 Jun; 18(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 16603584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of panel-based criteria to evaluate the appropriateness of colonoscopy: a prospective study.
Froehlich F; Pache I; Burnand B; Vader JP; Fried M; Beglinger C; Stalder G; Gyr K; Thorens J; Schneider C; Kosecoff J; Kolodny M; DuBois RW; Gonvers JJ; Brook RH
Gastrointest Endosc; 1998 Aug; 48(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 9717777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of panel composition on physician ratings of appropriateness of abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery: elucidating differences between multispecialty panel results and specialty society recommendations.
Herrin J; Etchason JA; Kahan JP; Brook RH; Ballard DJ
Health Policy; 1997 Oct; 42(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 10173494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The appropriateness of treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a comparison of Dutch and multinational criteria.
McDonnell J; Stoevelaar HJ; Bosch JL; Kahan JP; ;
Health Policy; 2001 Jul; 57(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 11348693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. EPACT II: project and methods.
Juillerat P; Froehlich F; Felley C; Pittet V; Mottet C; Gonvers JJ; Michetti P; Vader JP
Digestion; 2007; 76(2):84-91. PubMed ID: 18239398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The European panel on the appropriateness of gastrointestinal endoscopy guidelines colonoscopy in an open-access endoscopy unit: a prospective study.
Balaguer F; Llach J; Castells A; Bordas JM; Ppellisé M; Rodríguez-Moranta F; Mata A; Fernández-Esparrach G; Ginès A; Piqué JM
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2005 Mar; 21(5):609-13. PubMed ID: 15740545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Appropriateness of Indications of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and its Association With Positive Finding.
Bohara TP; Laudari U; Thapa A; Rupakheti S; Joshi MR
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2018; 56(209):504-509. PubMed ID: 30058633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Appropriateness and diagnostic yield of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in an open-access endoscopy unit.
Gonvers JJ; Burnand B; Froehlich F; Pache I; Thorens J; Fried M; Kosecoff J; Vader JP; Brook RH
Endoscopy; 1996 Oct; 28(8):661-6. PubMed ID: 8934082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between the two systems to evaluate the appropriateness of endoscopy of the upper digestive tract.
Bersani G; Rossi A; Suzzi A; Ricci G; De Fabritiis G; Alvisi V
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Nov; 99(11):2128-35. PubMed ID: 15554991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Overuse of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in a country with open-access endoscopy: a prospective study in primary care.
Froehlich F; Burnand B; Pache I; Vader JP; Fried M; Schneider C; Kosecoff J; Kolodny M; DuBois RW; Brook RH; Gonvers JJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 1997 Jan; 45(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 9013164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic yield of upper endoscopy according to appropriateness: A systematic review.
Zullo A; Manta R; De Francesco V; Fiorini G; Hassan C; Vaira D
Dig Liver Dis; 2019 Mar; 51(3):335-339. PubMed ID: 30583999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Appropriateness of cholecystectomy: the public and private sectors compared.
Scott EA; Black N
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1992 Jul; 74(4 Suppl):97-101. PubMed ID: 1416696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
