BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9154497)

  • 1. Comparing results of concurrent and retrospective designs in a hospital utilization review.
    Santos-Eggimann B; Sidler M; Schopfer D; Blanc T
    Int J Qual Health Care; 1997 Apr; 9(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 9154497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Concurrent medical record analysis in a community hospital.
    Lee MP
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1984 Jun; 55(6):45-7. PubMed ID: 10310655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Corroboration of concurrent assessment of inappropriate hospitalization with retrospective evaluation based on patient records].
    Schneeweiss S; Sangha O; Wildner M; Siebert H; Hübner M; Witte J
    Gesundheitswesen; 2000 Apr; 62(4):207-10. PubMed ID: 10844817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medical appropriateness of hospital utilization: an overview of the Swiss experience.
    Santos-Eggimann B; Paccaud F; Blanc T
    Int J Qual Health Care; 1995 Sep; 7(3):227-32. PubMed ID: 8595459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Cause of non-pertinent hospital stays: interobserver concordance using the French version of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol].
    Lombard I; Lahmek P; Diène E; Monnet E; Logerot H; Levy Soussan M; Huet B; Six P; Yeu C; Lang T;
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2001 Sep; 49(4):367-75. PubMed ID: 11567203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The design and analysis of hospital utilization studies.
    Ash A
    Int J Qual Health Care; 1995 Sep; 7(3):245-52. PubMed ID: 8595462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Concurrent chart analysis and DRG assignment in a prospective payment environment.
    Shlala TJ
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1988 Nov; 59(11):34-40. PubMed ID: 10312715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of concurrent feedback in reducing inappropriate hospital utilization.
    Restuccia JD
    Med Care; 1982 Jan; 20(1):46-62. PubMed ID: 7043116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Review ensures quick response to faulty care.
    Sherber J
    Hospitals; 1980 Aug; 54(15):55-7. PubMed ID: 7390465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hospital-based utilization management: a cross-Canada survey.
    Anderson G; Sheps SB; Cardiff K
    CMAJ; 1990 Nov; 143(10):1025-30. PubMed ID: 2224668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The development and implementation of a drug utilization review program.
    Lazor-Bajcar JM; Fowler R
    Can J Hosp Pharm; 1988 Feb; 41(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 10286608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality assurance: a concurrent monitoring system.
    Grabowski BS
    Top Hosp Pharm Manage; 1988 Feb; 7(4):8-13. PubMed ID: 10314270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The reliability of medical records.
    Still S
    J Am Med Rec Assoc (1980); 1980 Aug; 51(4):20-7. PubMed ID: 10248615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The evolution of hospital utilization review methods in the United States.
    Restuccia JD
    Int J Qual Health Care; 1995 Sep; 7(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 8595463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Concurrent clinical review: using microcomputer-based DRG-software.
    Huertas-Portocarrero D; Ruiz PP; Marmol JP
    Health Policy; 1988; 9(2):211-7. PubMed ID: 10312511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The medical management analysis system: a professional liability warning mechanism.
    Craddick JW
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1979 Apr; 5(4):2-8. PubMed ID: 121411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality assurance through automated monitoring and concurrent feedback using a computer-based medical information system.
    Barnett GO; Winickoff R; Dorsey JL; Morgan MM; Lurie RS
    Med Care; 1978 Nov; 16(11):962-70. PubMed ID: 101723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the use of narrow age ranges in setting review dates for pediatric patients.
    Ament RP
    PAS Rep; 1978 Mar; 16(3):33-9. PubMed ID: 10308496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CONTINUUM-Activity Index: managing admission inappropriate stays in a community hospital.
    Atkinson DI; Jenkins S; Collins PE; Minor J
    Healthc Manage Forum; 1999; 12(2):31-6. PubMed ID: 10538539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An effective utilization review program using accurate management information.
    Hoyt JP
    Healthc Comput Commun; 1985 Jan; 2(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 10310975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.