164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9154784)
21. Meta-analysis of skin adhesives versus sutures in closure of laparoscopic port-site wounds.
Sajid MS; Siddiqui MR; Khan MA; Baig MK
Surg Endosc; 2009 Jun; 23(6):1191-7. PubMed ID: 19263132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Use of adhesive surgical tape with the absorbable continuous subcuticular suture.
Kolt JD
ANZ J Surg; 2003 Aug; 73(8):626-9. PubMed ID: 12887534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Subcuticular sutures and the rate of inflammation in noncontaminated wounds.
Austin PE; Dunn KA; Eily-Cofield K; Brown CK; Wooden WA; Bradfield JF
Ann Emerg Med; 1995 Mar; 25(3):328-30. PubMed ID: 7864471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of Subcuticular Suture Type for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Buresch AM; Van Arsdale A; Ferzli M; Sahasrabudhe N; Sun M; Bernstein J; Bernstein PS; Ngai IM; Garry DJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 130(3):521-526. PubMed ID: 28796687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sutureless circumcision using 2-Octyl cyanoacrylate results in more rapid and less painful procedures with excellent cosmetic satisfaction.
Van Haute C; Tailly T; Klockaerts K; Ringoir Y
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Jun; 11(3):147.e1-5. PubMed ID: 25910797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
Mackeen AD; Berghella V; Larsen ML
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep; (9):CD003577. PubMed ID: 22972064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Performance comparison of nylon and an absorbable suture material (Polyglactin 910) in the closure of punch biopsy sites.
Gabel EA; Jimenez GP; Eaglstein WH; Kerdel FA; Falanga V
Dermatol Surg; 2000 Aug; 26(8):750-2; discussion 752-3. PubMed ID: 10940061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Subcuticular sutures in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a comparative study to evaluate wound infection rates and cosmetic results.
Grieco M; Spoletini D; Marcasciano M; Grattarola E; Shihab V; Carlini M
Updates Surg; 2020 Dec; 72(4):1005-1011. PubMed ID: 32166717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Aesthetic and functional efficacy of subcuticular running epidermal closures of the trunk and extremity: a rater-blinded randomized control trial.
Alam M; Posten W; Martini MC; Wrone DA; Rademaker AW
Arch Dermatol; 2006 Oct; 142(10):1272-8. PubMed ID: 17043181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Barbed versus standard suture: a randomized trial for laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure.
Einarsson JI; Cohen SL; Gobern JM; Sandberg EM; Hill-Lydecker CI; Wang K; Brown DN
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(4):492-8. PubMed ID: 23680517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparative study of leg wound skin closure in coronary artery bypass graft operations.
Angelini GD; Butchart EG; Armistead SH; Breckenridge IM
Thorax; 1984 Dec; 39(12):942-5. PubMed ID: 6096982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Origin and Development of Interrupted Subcuticular Suture: An Important Technique for Achieving Optimum Wound Closure.
Zhang W; Xie J; Zeng A
Dermatol Surg; 2022 Jun; 48(6):619-624. PubMed ID: 35315801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of gross and histologic tissue responses of skin incisions closed by use of absorbable subcuticular staples, cutaneous metal staples, and polyglactin 910 suture in pigs.
Fick JL; Novo RE; Kirchhof N
Am J Vet Res; 2005 Nov; 66(11):1975-84. PubMed ID: 16334959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Aesthetic comparison of wound closure techniques in a porcine model.
Tritle NM; Haller JR; Gray SD
Laryngoscope; 2001 Nov; 111(11 Pt 1):1949-51. PubMed ID: 11801975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples vs. subcuticular suture.
Frishman GN; Schwartz T; Hogan JW
J Reprod Med; 1997 Oct; 42(10):627-30. PubMed ID: 9350017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
Zaki MN; Wing DA; McNulty JA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 218(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 29474843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Skin closure. A prospective randomized study].
Lundblad R; Simensen HV; Wiig JN; Niels Grüner OP
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1989 Apr; 109(12):1307-9. PubMed ID: 2660322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures.
Rousseau JA; Girard K; Turcot-Lemay L; Thomas N
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 200(3):265.e1-4. PubMed ID: 19254586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Skin closure in carpal tunnel surgery: a prospective comparative study between nylon, polyglactin 910 and stainless steel sutures.
Menovsky T; Bartels RH; van Lindert EL; Grotenhuis JA
Hand Surg; 2004 Jul; 9(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 15368623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dramatically reduced incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscence in gynecologic patients undergoing endoscopic closure with barbed sutures: A retrospective cohort study.
Rettenmaier MA; Abaid LN; Brown JV; Mendivil AA; Lopez KL; Goldstein BH
Int J Surg; 2015 Jul; 19():27-30. PubMed ID: 25980394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
