165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9155075)
1. Measurement of the peripheral dose for the tangential breast treatment technique with Co-60 gamma radiation and high energy X-rays.
Van der Giessen PH
Radiother Oncol; 1997 Mar; 42(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 9155075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fetal dose estimates for electron-beam treatment to the chest wall of a pregnant patient.
Antolak JA; Strom EA
Med Phys; 1998 Dec; 25(12):2388-91. PubMed ID: 9874832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fetal dose evaluation during breast cancer radiotherapy.
Antypas C; Sandilos P; Kouvaris J; Balafouta E; Karinou E; Kollaros N; Vlahos L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Mar; 40(4):995-9. PubMed ID: 9531386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative dosimetric study on tangential photon beams, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and modulated electron radiotherapy (MERT) for breast cancer treatment.
Ma CM; Ding M; Li JS; Lee MC; Pawlicki T; Deng J
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Apr; 48(7):909-24. PubMed ID: 12701895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intensity modulation to improve dose uniformity with tangential breast radiotherapy: initial clinical experience.
Kestin LL; Sharpe MB; Frazier RC; Vicini FA; Yan D; Matter RC; Martinez AA; Wong JW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Dec; 48(5):1559-68. PubMed ID: 11121662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative study for surface dose evaluation in conventional treatment of carcinoma breast patients irradiated with Co-60 and 6 MV radiation beam.
Singh R; Oinam AS; Trivedi G; Kainth HS; Shahi JS; Singh B; Kapoor R
J Cancer Res Ther; 2019; 15(5):1035-1041. PubMed ID: 31603107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Wedge factor constituents of high-energy photon beams: head and phantom scatter dose components.
Heukelom S; Lanson JH; Mijnheer BJ
Radiother Oncol; 1994 Jul; 32(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 7938681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differences in wedge factor determination in air using a PMMA mini-phantom or a brass build-up cap.
Heukelom S; Lanson JH; Mijnheer BJ
Med Phys; 1997 Dec; 24(12):1986-91. PubMed ID: 9434981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Superficial dose distribution in breast for tangential radiation treatment, Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse algorithms in case of phantom and patient geometries.
Chakarova R; Gustafsson M; Bäck A; Drugge N; Palm Å; Lindberg A; Berglund M
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 21741719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional dose distribution of tangential breast treatment: a national dosimetry intercomparison.
van Bree NA; van Battum LJ; Huizenga H; Mijnheer BJ
Radiother Oncol; 1991 Dec; 22(4):252-60. PubMed ID: 1792317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Dosimetric evaluation of intensity-modulated tangential beam versus conventional tangential irradiation for breast cancer].
Huang XB; Jiang GL; Chen JY; Chen LF; Hu WG
Ai Zheng; 2006 Jul; 25(7):855-60. PubMed ID: 16831277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of two- and three-dimensional photon dose calculation for tangential irradiation of the breast.
Davis JB; Pfäfflin A; Cozzi AF
Radiother Oncol; 1997 Mar; 42(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 9155073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of a CT simulator in radiotherapy treatment planning for breast conserving therapy.
Hiraoka M; Mitsumori M; Okajima K; Nagata Y; Takahashi M; Nakata M; Abe M
Radiother Oncol; 1994 Oct; 33(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 7878209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Physical factors affecting absorbed dose to the skin from cobalt-60 gamma rays and 25-MV x rays.
Gagnon WF; Horton JL
Med Phys; 1979; 6(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 113655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Verification of the accuracy of 3D calculations of breast dose during tangential irradiation: measurements in a breast phantom.
Kirsner SM; Prado KL; Tailor RC; Bencomo JA
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2001; 2(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 11602011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of contralateral breast doses from 1/2 beam block and isocentric treatment techniques for patients treated with primary breast irradiation with 60CO.
Tercilla O; Krasin F; Lawn-Tsao L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1989 Jul; 17(1):205-10. PubMed ID: 2745194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surface and superficial dose dosimetric verification for postmastectomy radiotherapy.
Shiau AC; Chiu MC; Chen TH; Chiou JF; Shueng PW; Chen SW; Chen WL; Kuan WP
Med Dosim; 2012; 37(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 22552120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional photon dose distributions with and without lung corrections for tangential breast intact treatments.
Chin LM; Cheng CW; Siddon RL; Rice RK; Mijnheer BJ; Harris JR
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1989 Dec; 17(6):1327-35. PubMed ID: 2513292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Refined gypsum effective attenuation coefficients for Co-60, 6 MV, 10 MV and 18 MV x-rays.
Glasgow GP; Dogan N; Sethi A; Stanton J
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Jan; 48(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 12564501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
