These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9155075)

  • 1. Measurement of the peripheral dose for the tangential breast treatment technique with Co-60 gamma radiation and high energy X-rays.
    Van der Giessen PH
    Radiother Oncol; 1997 Mar; 42(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 9155075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fetal dose estimates for electron-beam treatment to the chest wall of a pregnant patient.
    Antolak JA; Strom EA
    Med Phys; 1998 Dec; 25(12):2388-91. PubMed ID: 9874832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fetal dose evaluation during breast cancer radiotherapy.
    Antypas C; Sandilos P; Kouvaris J; Balafouta E; Karinou E; Kollaros N; Vlahos L
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Mar; 40(4):995-9. PubMed ID: 9531386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative dosimetric study on tangential photon beams, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and modulated electron radiotherapy (MERT) for breast cancer treatment.
    Ma CM; Ding M; Li JS; Lee MC; Pawlicki T; Deng J
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Apr; 48(7):909-24. PubMed ID: 12701895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intensity modulation to improve dose uniformity with tangential breast radiotherapy: initial clinical experience.
    Kestin LL; Sharpe MB; Frazier RC; Vicini FA; Yan D; Matter RC; Martinez AA; Wong JW
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Dec; 48(5):1559-68. PubMed ID: 11121662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative study for surface dose evaluation in conventional treatment of carcinoma breast patients irradiated with Co-60 and 6 MV radiation beam.
    Singh R; Oinam AS; Trivedi G; Kainth HS; Shahi JS; Singh B; Kapoor R
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2019; 15(5):1035-1041. PubMed ID: 31603107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Wedge factor constituents of high-energy photon beams: head and phantom scatter dose components.
    Heukelom S; Lanson JH; Mijnheer BJ
    Radiother Oncol; 1994 Jul; 32(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 7938681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in wedge factor determination in air using a PMMA mini-phantom or a brass build-up cap.
    Heukelom S; Lanson JH; Mijnheer BJ
    Med Phys; 1997 Dec; 24(12):1986-91. PubMed ID: 9434981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Superficial dose distribution in breast for tangential radiation treatment, Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse algorithms in case of phantom and patient geometries.
    Chakarova R; Gustafsson M; Bäck A; Drugge N; Palm Å; Lindberg A; Berglund M
    Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 21741719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional dose distribution of tangential breast treatment: a national dosimetry intercomparison.
    van Bree NA; van Battum LJ; Huizenga H; Mijnheer BJ
    Radiother Oncol; 1991 Dec; 22(4):252-60. PubMed ID: 1792317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Dosimetric evaluation of intensity-modulated tangential beam versus conventional tangential irradiation for breast cancer].
    Huang XB; Jiang GL; Chen JY; Chen LF; Hu WG
    Ai Zheng; 2006 Jul; 25(7):855-60. PubMed ID: 16831277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of two- and three-dimensional photon dose calculation for tangential irradiation of the breast.
    Davis JB; Pfäfflin A; Cozzi AF
    Radiother Oncol; 1997 Mar; 42(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 9155073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
    Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
    Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of a CT simulator in radiotherapy treatment planning for breast conserving therapy.
    Hiraoka M; Mitsumori M; Okajima K; Nagata Y; Takahashi M; Nakata M; Abe M
    Radiother Oncol; 1994 Oct; 33(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 7878209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Physical factors affecting absorbed dose to the skin from cobalt-60 gamma rays and 25-MV x rays.
    Gagnon WF; Horton JL
    Med Phys; 1979; 6(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 113655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Verification of the accuracy of 3D calculations of breast dose during tangential irradiation: measurements in a breast phantom.
    Kirsner SM; Prado KL; Tailor RC; Bencomo JA
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2001; 2(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 11602011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of contralateral breast doses from 1/2 beam block and isocentric treatment techniques for patients treated with primary breast irradiation with 60CO.
    Tercilla O; Krasin F; Lawn-Tsao L
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1989 Jul; 17(1):205-10. PubMed ID: 2745194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surface and superficial dose dosimetric verification for postmastectomy radiotherapy.
    Shiau AC; Chiu MC; Chen TH; Chiou JF; Shueng PW; Chen SW; Chen WL; Kuan WP
    Med Dosim; 2012; 37(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 22552120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional photon dose distributions with and without lung corrections for tangential breast intact treatments.
    Chin LM; Cheng CW; Siddon RL; Rice RK; Mijnheer BJ; Harris JR
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1989 Dec; 17(6):1327-35. PubMed ID: 2513292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Refined gypsum effective attenuation coefficients for Co-60, 6 MV, 10 MV and 18 MV x-rays.
    Glasgow GP; Dogan N; Sethi A; Stanton J
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Jan; 48(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 12564501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.