These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9155810)
1. Individualized evaluation of facial form. Fishman LS Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 May; 111(5):510-7. PubMed ID: 9155810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Statistical analysis of the correlation of the soft tissue profile on the skeletal and dental elements using the Neger angle]. Roth R; Rutz A; Schnieper R Inf Orthod Kieferorthop; 1981; 13(3):199-216. PubMed ID: 6946966 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Early adult changes in the skeletal and soft-tissue profile. Sarnäs KV; Solow B Eur J Orthod; 1980; 2(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 6935053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of facial form. Eastwood AW Dent Clin North Am; 1978 Oct; 22(4):539-55. PubMed ID: 279476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Spontaneous dento-cephalometric changes after the young adult stage]. Crétot M Orthod Fr; 1997; 68(1):41-55. PubMed ID: 9432623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Analysis of dentofacial structures with a graphic "is-should be" comparison]. Hollmann K Inf Orthod Kieferorthop; 1984; 16(4):407-16. PubMed ID: 6595227 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [A roentgenocephalometric study of teeth and profile changes in orthodontically treated patient with four bicuspid extractions]. Son BH; Park YC Taehan Chikkwa Uisa Hyophoe Chi; 1984 May; 22(5):429-38. PubMed ID: 6590710 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Superimposition and structural analysis. Schudy F Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Feb; 109(2):180-92. PubMed ID: 8638568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pattern commonality in the facial orientation of the occlusal region: form-functional significance and clinical potentiality. Zingeser MR Am J Orthod; 1974 Nov; 66(5):516-37. PubMed ID: 4621249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [A lateral cephalometric study of the relation between hard tissue and soft tissue - comparing children with adults based on facial plane]. Higashi T Shigaku; 1982 Jun; 70(1):111-25. PubMed ID: 6964826 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Size and shape of soft-tissue facial profile: effects of age, gender, and skeletal class. Ferrario VF; Sforza C Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Nov; 34(6):498-504. PubMed ID: 9431467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An evaluation of two VTO methods. Sample LB; Sadowsky PL; Bradley E Angle Orthod; 1998 Oct; 68(5):401-8. PubMed ID: 9770097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Facial growth of males and females compared by tensor analysis. Battagel JM Br J Orthod; 1994 Aug; 21(3):245-57. PubMed ID: 7947579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Facial and dental changes in adulthood. Bishara SE; Treder JE; Jakobsen JR Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Aug; 106(2):175-86. PubMed ID: 8059754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Growth and development of regional units in the head and face based on anthropometric measurements. Farkas LG; Posnick JC Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1992 Jul; 29(4):301-2. PubMed ID: 1643056 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of sonically derived and traditional cephalometric values. Hall DL; Bollen AM Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(5):365-72. PubMed ID: 9347110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]