BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9155810)

  • 1. Individualized evaluation of facial form.
    Fishman LS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 May; 111(5):510-7. PubMed ID: 9155810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Statistical analysis of the correlation of the soft tissue profile on the skeletal and dental elements using the Neger angle].
    Roth R; Rutz A; Schnieper R
    Inf Orthod Kieferorthop; 1981; 13(3):199-216. PubMed ID: 6946966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cephalometric soft tissue facial analysis.
    Bergman RT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Oct; 116(4):373-89. PubMed ID: 10511665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Early adult changes in the skeletal and soft-tissue profile.
    Sarnäs KV; Solow B
    Eur J Orthod; 1979; 2(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 296945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Four-dimensional facial change.
    Burke P
    Br J Orthod; 1984 Oct; 11(4):170-84. PubMed ID: 6594158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early adult changes in the skeletal and soft-tissue profile.
    Sarnäs KV; Solow B
    Eur J Orthod; 1980; 2(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 6935053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of facial form.
    Eastwood AW
    Dent Clin North Am; 1978 Oct; 22(4):539-55. PubMed ID: 279476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Spontaneous dento-cephalometric changes after the young adult stage].
    Crétot M
    Orthod Fr; 1997; 68(1):41-55. PubMed ID: 9432623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Analysis of dentofacial structures with a graphic "is-should be" comparison].
    Hollmann K
    Inf Orthod Kieferorthop; 1984; 16(4):407-16. PubMed ID: 6595227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A roentgenocephalometric study of teeth and profile changes in orthodontically treated patient with four bicuspid extractions].
    Son BH; Park YC
    Taehan Chikkwa Uisa Hyophoe Chi; 1984 May; 22(5):429-38. PubMed ID: 6590710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Superimposition and structural analysis.
    Schudy F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Feb; 109(2):180-92. PubMed ID: 8638568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pattern commonality in the facial orientation of the occlusal region: form-functional significance and clinical potentiality.
    Zingeser MR
    Am J Orthod; 1974 Nov; 66(5):516-37. PubMed ID: 4621249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [A lateral cephalometric study of the relation between hard tissue and soft tissue - comparing children with adults based on facial plane].
    Higashi T
    Shigaku; 1982 Jun; 70(1):111-25. PubMed ID: 6964826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Size and shape of soft-tissue facial profile: effects of age, gender, and skeletal class.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Nov; 34(6):498-504. PubMed ID: 9431467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An evaluation of two VTO methods.
    Sample LB; Sadowsky PL; Bradley E
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Oct; 68(5):401-8. PubMed ID: 9770097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ANB skeletal types correlated to facial morphology: Euclidean distance matrix analysis.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; D'Addona A; Miani A; Poggio CE
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(3):181-90. PubMed ID: 8301166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Facial growth of males and females compared by tensor analysis.
    Battagel JM
    Br J Orthod; 1994 Aug; 21(3):245-57. PubMed ID: 7947579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Facial and dental changes in adulthood.
    Bishara SE; Treder JE; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Aug; 106(2):175-86. PubMed ID: 8059754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Growth and development of regional units in the head and face based on anthropometric measurements.
    Farkas LG; Posnick JC
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1992 Jul; 29(4):301-2. PubMed ID: 1643056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of sonically derived and traditional cephalometric values.
    Hall DL; Bollen AM
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(5):365-72. PubMed ID: 9347110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.