107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9156081)
1. The logic of contrition.
Boerlijst MC; Nowak MA; Sigmund K
J Theor Biol; 1997 Apr; 185(3):281-93. PubMed ID: 9156081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. No strategy is evolutionarily stable in the repeated prisoner's dilemma.
Lorberbaum J
J Theor Biol; 1994 May; 168(2):117-30. PubMed ID: 8022193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the Prisoner's Dilemma game.
Nowak M; Sigmund K
Nature; 1993 Jul; 364(6432):56-8. PubMed ID: 8316296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The spatial struggle of tit-for-tat and defect.
Hutson VC; Vickers GT
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1995 Jun; 348(1326):393-404. PubMed ID: 7480111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimality under noise: higher memory strategies for the alternating prisoner's dilemma.
Neill DB
J Theor Biol; 2001 Jul; 211(2):159-80. PubMed ID: 11419957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Emergence of cooperation and evolutionary stability in finite populations.
Nowak MA; Sasaki A; Taylor C; Fudenberg D
Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6983):646-50. PubMed ID: 15071593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are there really no evolutionarily stable strategies in the iterated prisoner's dilemma?
Lorberbaum JP; Bohning DE; Shastri A; Sine LE
J Theor Biol; 2002 Jan; 214(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 11812170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evolutionarily stable strategy distributions for the Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma.
Mowbray M
J Theor Biol; 1997 Jul; 187(2):223-9. PubMed ID: 9237893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. TIT FOR TAT in sticklebacks and the evolution of cooperation.
Milinski M
Nature; 1987 Jan 29-Feb 4; 325(6103):433-5. PubMed ID: 3808044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evolution of strategies in the three-person iterated prisoner's dilemma game.
Matsushima M; Ikegami T
J Theor Biol; 1998 Nov; 195(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 9802950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Human cooperation in the simultaneous and the alternating Prisoner's Dilemma: Pavlov versus Generous Tit-for-Tat.
Wedekind C; Milinski M
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1996 Apr; 93(7):2686-9. PubMed ID: 11607644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cumulative benefit games: achieving cooperation when players discount the future.
Stephens DW
J Theor Biol; 2000 Jul; 205(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 10860696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A strategy with novel evolutionary features for the iterated prisoner's dilemma.
Li J; Kendall G
Evol Comput; 2009; 17(2):257-74. PubMed ID: 19413490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The continuous Prisoner's dilemma: II. Linear reactive strategies with noise.
Wahl LM; Nowak MA
J Theor Biol; 1999 Oct; 200(3):323-38. PubMed ID: 10527721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cooperative boundary populations: the evolution of cooperation on mortality risk gradients.
Harms W
J Theor Biol; 2001 Nov; 213(2):299-313. PubMed ID: 11894996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The continuous prisoner's dilemma and the evolution of cooperation through reciprocal altruism with variable investment.
Killingback T; Doebeli M
Am Nat; 2002 Oct; 160(4):421-38. PubMed ID: 18707520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Win-stay, lose-shift strategies for repeated games-memory length, aspiration levels and noise.
Posch M
J Theor Biol; 1999 May; 198(2):183-95. PubMed ID: 10339393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evolutionary escape from the prisoner's dilemma.
Worden L; Levin SA
J Theor Biol; 2007 Apr; 245(3):411-22. PubMed ID: 17169377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sex, the Prisoner's Dilemma Game, and the evolutionary inevitability of cooperation.
Koeslag JH
J Theor Biol; 1997 Nov; 189(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 9398503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma: pay-off variance.
Nishimura K; Stephens DW
J Theor Biol; 1997 Sep; 188(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 9299305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
