BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9156226)

  • 1. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity for individual Sloan letters.
    Alexander KR; Xie W; Derlacki DJ
    Vision Res; 1997 Mar; 37(6):813-9. PubMed ID: 9156226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual Letter Contrast Thresholds: Effect of Object Frequency and Noise.
    Hall C; Wang S; McAnany JJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Dec; 92(12):1125-32. PubMed ID: 26540471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial-frequency characteristics of letter identification.
    Alexander KR; Xie W; Derlacki DJ
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1994 Sep; 11(9):2375-82. PubMed ID: 7931762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of response biases on resolution thresholds of Sloan letters in central and paracentral vision.
    Barhoom H; Joshi MR; Schmidtmann G
    Vision Res; 2021 Oct; 187():110-119. PubMed ID: 34252726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Slope of psychometric functions and termination rule analysis for low contrast acuity charts.
    Carkeet A; Bailey IL
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Mar; 37(2):118-127. PubMed ID: 28211180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differences in the legibility of letters at contrast threshold using the Pelli-Robson chart.
    Elliott DB; Whitaker D; Bonette L
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1990 Oct; 10(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 2263364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Test-retest variability and correlations between tests of texture processing, motion processing, visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity.
    Simpson TL; Regan D
    Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Jan; 72(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 7731649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Thresholds for sampled sloan letters are smaller than sample spacing.
    Carkeet A; Gerasimou DF; Parsonson LR; Biffin KL; Fredericksen BJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Dec; 85(12):1142-50. PubMed ID: 19050469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A modified ETDRS visual acuity chart for European-wide use.
    Plainis S; Tzatzala P; Orphanos Y; Tsilimbaris MK
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 84(7):647-53. PubMed ID: 17632314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer monitor pixellation and Sloan letter visual acuity measurement.
    Carkeet A; Lister LJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Mar; 38(2):144-151. PubMed ID: 29280165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporal properties of letter identification in retinitis pigmentosa.
    Alexander KR; Derlacki DJ; Fishman GA; Szlyk JP
    J Opt Soc Am A; 1993 Jul; 10(7):1631-6. PubMed ID: 8350152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using visual noise to characterize amblyopic letter identification.
    Pelli DG; Levi DM; Chung ST
    J Vis; 2004 Oct; 4(10):904-20. PubMed ID: 15595894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-based measurement of letter and word acuity.
    Whatham AR; Mermoud C; Déruaz A; Goldschmidt M; Zesiger P; Safran AB
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Mar; 26(2):156-68. PubMed ID: 16460316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contrast thresholds for letter identification in retinitis pigmentosa.
    Alexander KR; Derlacki DJ; Fishman GA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1992 May; 33(6):1846-52. PubMed ID: 1582787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of exposure duration on visual acuity for letter optotypes and gratings.
    McAnany JJ
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():86-91. PubMed ID: 25281413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of spatial sampling on grating resolution and letter identification.
    Alexander KR; Xie W; Derlacki DJ; Szlyk JP
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1995 Sep; 12(9):1825-33. PubMed ID: 7674063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual acuity for optotypes made visible by relative motion.
    Regan D; Hong XH
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Jan; 67(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 2308752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optical defocus: differential effects on size and contrast letter recognition thresholds.
    Rabin J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1994 Feb; 35(2):646-8. PubMed ID: 8113015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of an Automated Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Low-contrast Letter Acuity Test.
    Pang Y; Sparschu L; Nylin E; Wang J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 May; 97(5):370-376. PubMed ID: 32413009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recognition thresholds for letters with simulated dioptric blur.
    Akutsu H; Bedell HE; Patel SS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2000 Oct; 77(10):524-30. PubMed ID: 11100890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.