These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9156226)

  • 21. The effect of contrast polarity on letter identification.
    Alexander KR; Xie W; Derlacki DJ
    Vision Res; 1993 Dec; 33(17):2491-7. PubMed ID: 8249329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Contrast sensitivity for letter optotypes vs. gratings under conditions biased toward parvocellular and magnocellular pathways.
    McAnany JJ; Alexander KR
    Vision Res; 2006 May; 46(10):1574-84. PubMed ID: 16213001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Normal values for a clinical test of letter-recognition contrast thresholds.
    Khanani AM; Brown SM; Xu KT
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Nov; 30(11):2377-82. PubMed ID: 15519092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. New visual acuity chart: modification for clinical practice and research.
    Pisarnkorskul P; Singhkuna L
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 Mar; 86(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 12757065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Word acuity threshold as a function of contrast and retinal eccentricity.
    Abdelnour O; Kalloniatis M
    Optom Vis Sci; 2001 Dec; 78(12):914-9. PubMed ID: 11780669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of luminance noise on the object frequencies mediating letter identification.
    Hall C; Wang S; Bhagat R; McAnany JJ
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():663. PubMed ID: 25071637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Visual acuity vs letter contrast sensitivity in retinitis pigmentosa.
    Alexander KR; Derlacki DJ; Fishman GA
    Vision Res; 1995 May; 35(10):1495-9. PubMed ID: 7645278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Predicting visual acuity from detection thresholds.
    Newacheck JS; Haegerstrom-Portnoy G; Adams AJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Mar; 67(3):184-91. PubMed ID: 2320362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The slope of the psychometric function for Bailey-Lovie letter charts: defocus effects and implications for modeling letter-by-letter scores.
    Carkeet A; Lee L; Kerr JR; Keung MM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2001 Feb; 78(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 11265926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Contrast letter thresholds in the non-affected eye of strabismic and unilateral eye enucleated subjects.
    Reed MJ; Steeves JK; Steinbach MJ; Kraft S; Gallie B
    Vision Res; 1996 Sep; 36(18):3011-8. PubMed ID: 8917801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Relative letter and position difficulty on visual acuity charts from the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study.
    Ferris FL; Freidlin V; Kassoff A; Green SB; Milton RC
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1993 Dec; 116(6):735-40. PubMed ID: 8250077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mesopic visual acuity is less crowded.
    Pluháček F; Siderov J
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 256(9):1739-1746. PubMed ID: 29808376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of defocus on edge contrast sensitivity.
    Jansonius NM; Kooijman AC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Mar; 17(2):128-32. PubMed ID: 9196675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. M&S Smart System Contrast Sensitivity Measurements Compared With Standard Visual Function Measurements in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients.
    Liu JL; McAnany JJ; Wilensky JT; Aref AA; Vajaranant TS
    J Glaucoma; 2017 Jun; 26(6):528-533. PubMed ID: 28333894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of scoring and termination rules on test-retest variability of a novel high-pass letter acuity chart.
    Shah N; Dakin SC; Whitaker HL; Anderson RS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Mar; 55(3):1386-92. PubMed ID: 24519424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Spatial-frequency properties of letter identification in amblyopia.
    Chung ST; Levi DM; Legge GE; Tjan BS
    Vision Res; 2002 Jun; 42(12):1571-81. PubMed ID: 12074951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Higher-contrast requirements for recognizing low-pass-filtered letters.
    Kwon M; Legge GE
    J Vis; 2013 Jan; 13(1):13. PubMed ID: 23302216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Optotype recognition under degradation: comparison of size, contrast, blur, noise and contour-perturbation effects.
    Westheimer G
    Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Jan; 99(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 26792583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Two eyes are better than one: binocular enhancement in the contrast domain.
    Rabin J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1995 Jan; 15(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 7724218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Contrast letter acuity as a visual component for the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite.
    Balcer LJ; Baier ML; Cohen JA; Kooijmans MF; Sandrock AW; Nano-Schiavi ML; Pfohl DC; Mills M; Bowen J; Ford C; Heidenreich FR; Jacobs DA; Markowitz CE; Stuart WH; Ying GS; Galetta SL; Maguire MG; Cutter GR
    Neurology; 2003 Nov; 61(10):1367-73. PubMed ID: 14638957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.