These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9156226)

  • 41. Crowding and visual acuity measured in adults using paediatric test letters, pictures and symbols.
    Lalor SJH; Formankiewicz MA; Waugh SJ
    Vision Res; 2016 Apr; 121():31-38. PubMed ID: 26878696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effect of optical defocus on detection and recognition of vanishing optotype letters in the fovea and periphery.
    Shah N; Dakin SC; Anderson RS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Oct; 53(11):7063-70. PubMed ID: 22969070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Contrast Energy and Contour Interaction.
    Bedell HE; Siderov J; Pluháček F
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Dec; 96(12):940-947. PubMed ID: 31834154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Improving the design of the letter contrast sensitivity test.
    Arditi A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 46(6):2225-9. PubMed ID: 15914645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Higher-contrast requirements for recognizing low-pass-filtered letters.
    Kwon M; Legge GE
    J Vis; 2013 Jan; 13(1):13. PubMed ID: 23302216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Relative legibility and confusions of letter acuity targets in the peripheral and central retina.
    Reich LN; Bedell HE
    Optom Vis Sci; 2000 May; 77(5):270-5. PubMed ID: 10831217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Spatial-frequency characteristics of letter identification in central and peripheral vision.
    Chung ST; Legge GE; Tjan BS
    Vision Res; 2002 Aug; 42(18):2137-152. PubMed ID: 12207975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Contour interaction for high and low contrast optotypes in normal and amblyopic observers.
    Simmers AJ; Gray LS; McGraw PV; Winn B
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1999 May; 19(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 10627844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, and Humphrey visual field testing in patients with glaucoma.
    Hawkins AS; Szlyk JP; Ardickas Z; Alexander KR; Wilensky JT
    J Glaucoma; 2003 Apr; 12(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 12671468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Identification of band-pass filtered letters and faces by human and ideal observers.
    Gold J; Bennett PJ; Sekuler AB
    Vision Res; 1999 Oct; 39(21):3537-60. PubMed ID: 10746125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Learning to identify contrast-defined letters in peripheral vision.
    Chung ST; Levi DM; Li RW
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(6-7):1038-47. PubMed ID: 16337252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [How should visual acuity be measured?].
    Langrová H; Hejcmanová D; Peregrin J
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 1996 Jul; 52(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 8768473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. An evaluation of the M&S technologies smart system II for visual acuity measurement in young visually-normal adults.
    McClenaghan N; Kimura A; Stark LR
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 84(3):218-23. PubMed ID: 17435535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Variations in the slope of the psychometric acuity function with acuity threshold and scale.
    Horner DG; Paul AD; Katz B; Bedell HE
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1985 Dec; 62(12):895-900. PubMed ID: 4083332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Foveal contour interaction for low contrast acuity targets.
    Siderov J; Waugh SJ; Bedell HE
    Vision Res; 2013 Jan; 77():10-3. PubMed ID: 23200866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Correlation of letter optotypes with Landholt ring for different degrees of visual acuity].
    Rassow B; Wang Y
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1999 Aug; 215(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 10483562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The Auckland Optotypes: An open-access pictogram set for measuring recognition acuity.
    Hamm LM; Yeoman JP; Anstice N; Dakin SC
    J Vis; 2018 Mar; 18(3):13. PubMed ID: 29677328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Treated amblyopes remain deficient in spatial vision: a contrast sensitivity and external noise study.
    Huang C; Tao L; Zhou Y; Lu ZL
    Vision Res; 2007 Jan; 47(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 17098275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Letter recognition at low contrast levels: effects of letter size.
    Blommaert FJ; Timmers H
    Perception; 1987; 16(4):421-32. PubMed ID: 3444723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Repeatability and reliability of the visual acuity examination on logMAR ETDRS and Snellen chart].
    Veselý P; Synek S
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2012 May; 68(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 22913870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.