BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9156236)

  • 1. The "proper" binormal model: parametric receiver operating characteristic curve estimation with degenerate data.
    Pan X; Metz CE
    Acad Radiol; 1997 May; 4(5):380-9. PubMed ID: 9156236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A bivariate contaminated binormal model for robust fitting of proper ROC curves to a pair of correlated, possibly degenerate, ROC datasets.
    Zhai X; Chakraborty DP
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2207-2222. PubMed ID: 28382718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating the Area Under ROC Curve When the Fitted Binormal Curves Demonstrate Improper Shape.
    Bandos AI; Guo B; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):209-219. PubMed ID: 27884464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "Proper" Binormal ROC Curves: Theory and Maximum-Likelihood Estimation.
    Metz CE; Pan X
    J Math Psychol; 1999 Mar; 43(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 10069933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Equivalence of binormal likelihood-ratio and bi-chi-squared ROC curve models.
    Hillis SL
    Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(12):2031-57. PubMed ID: 26608405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliable and computationally efficient maximum-likelihood estimation of "proper" binormal ROC curves.
    Pesce LL; Metz CE
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Jul; 14(7):814-29. PubMed ID: 17574132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Semiparametric estimation of the relationship between ROC operating points and the test-result scale: application to the proper binormal model.
    Pesce LL; Horsch K; Drukker K; Metz CE
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Dec; 18(12):1537-48. PubMed ID: 22055797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A contaminated binormal model for ROC data: Part III. Initial evaluation with detection ROC data.
    Dorfman DD; Berbaum KS
    Acad Radiol; 2000 Jun; 7(6):438-47. PubMed ID: 10845403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data.
    Metz CE; Herman BA; Shen JH
    Stat Med; 1998 May; 17(9):1033-53. PubMed ID: 9612889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Proper receiver operating characteristic analysis: the bigamma model.
    Dorfman DD; Berbaum KS; Metz CE; Lenth RV; Hanley JA; Abu Dagga H
    Acad Radiol; 1997 Feb; 4(2):138-49. PubMed ID: 9061087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using the mean-to-sigma ratio as a measure of the improperness of binormal ROC curves.
    Hillis SL; Berbaum KS
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):143-54. PubMed ID: 21232682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Degeneracy and discrete receiver operating characteristic rating data.
    Dorfman DD; Berbaum KS
    Acad Radiol; 1995 Oct; 2(10):907-15. PubMed ID: 9419659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of the 'binormal' model for parametric ROC analysis of quantitative diagnostic tests.
    Hanley JA
    Stat Med; 1996 Jul; 15(14):1575-85. PubMed ID: 8855483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of two priors on Bayesian estimation of "Proper" binormal ROC curves from common and degenerate datasets.
    Zur RM; Pesce LL; Jiang Y
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Aug; 17(8):969-79. PubMed ID: 20605491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ROC Curve for Extremely Subtle Lung Nodules on Chest Radiographs Confirmed by CT Scan.
    Shang H; Jiang Y; Li F; MacMahon H; Wang J
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 26774737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Constructing "proper" ROCs from ordinal response data using weighted power functions.
    Mossman D; Peng H
    Med Decis Making; 2014 May; 34(4):523-35. PubMed ID: 24029820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Smooth non-parametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Zou KH; Hall WJ; Shapiro DE
    Stat Med; 1997 Oct; 16(19):2143-56. PubMed ID: 9330425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Verification of modified receiver-operating characteristic software using simulated rating data.
    Shiraishi J; Fukuoka D; Iha R; Inada H; Tanaka R; Hara T
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2018 Dec; 11(4):406-414. PubMed ID: 30244314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using Dual Beta Distributions to Create "Proper" ROC Curves Based on Rating Category Data.
    Mossman D; Peng H
    Med Decis Making; 2016 Apr; 36(3):349-65. PubMed ID: 25911601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.