These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9157176)

  • 41. Confusions in recognizing phonemes spoken by esophageal speakers: I. initial consonants and clusters.
    Nichols AC
    J Commun Disord; 1976 Mar; 9(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 965503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The interactions of amplitude and phonetic quality in esophageal speech.
    Blood GW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1981 Jun; 24(2):308-12. PubMed ID: 7265948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A comparison of speech intelligibility between esophageal and normal speakers via three modes of presentation.
    Hubbard DJ; Kushner D
    J Speech Hear Res; 1980 Dec; 23(4):909-16. PubMed ID: 6160319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Tongue body kinematics in velar stop production: influences of consonant voicing and vowel context.
    Löfqvist A; Gracco VL
    Phonetica; 1994; 51(1-3):52-67. PubMed ID: 8052675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Voiceless consonants and locus equations: a comparison with electropalatographic data on coarticulation.
    Tabain M
    Phonetica; 2002; 59(1):20-37. PubMed ID: 11961419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Prosodic boundaries in alaryngeal speech.
    van Rossum MA; Quené H; Nooteboom SG
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2008 Mar; 22(3):215-31. PubMed ID: 18307086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effects of auditory feedback and phonetic context on stomal noise in laryngectomized speakers.
    Till JA; England KE; Law-Till CB
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1987 Aug; 52(3):243-50. PubMed ID: 3455447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Vowel and nasal duration as cues to voicing in word-final stop consonants: spectrographic and perceptual studies.
    Raphael LJ; Dorman MF; Freeman F; Tobin C
    J Speech Hear Res; 1975 Sep; 18(3):389-400. PubMed ID: 1186149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Influence of consonant voicing characteristics on sentence production in abductor versus adductor spasmodic dysphonia.
    Cannito MP; Chorna LB; Kahane JC; Dworkin JP
    J Voice; 2014 May; 28(3):394.e13-22. PubMed ID: 24440058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Control of voice-onset time in the absence of hearing: a review.
    Lane H; Perkell JS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Dec; 48(6):1334-43. PubMed ID: 16478375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Pitch perturbation measures of voice production of laryngectomees after the Amatsu tracheoesophageal shunt operation.
    Kinishi M; Amatsu M
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 1986; 13(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 3741270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Contextual variation of the vowel voice source as a function of adjacent consonants.
    Chasaide AN; Gobl C
    Lang Speech; 1993; 36 ( Pt 2-3)():303-30. PubMed ID: 8277812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Perceptual and acoustical analysis of alaryngeal speech: determinants of intelligibility.
    Drummond S; Dancer J; Krueger K; Spring G
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Dec; 83(3 Pt 1):801-2. PubMed ID: 8961316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Fundamental frequency, intensity, and vowel duration characteristics related to perception of Cantonese alaryngeal speech.
    Ng ML; Gilbert HR; Lerman JW
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2001; 53(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 11125259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Individual speaker influence on relative intelligibility of esophageal speech and artificial larynx speech.
    Kalb MB; Carpenter MA
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1981 Feb; 46(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 7206682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Stop identification from vocalic transition plus vowel segments of CV and VC syllables: a follow-up study.
    Ohde RN; Sharf DJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Jan; 69(1):297-300. PubMed ID: 7217528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Physiological assessment of speech and voice production of adults with hearing loss.
    Higgins MB; Carney AE; Schulte L
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Jun; 37(3):510-21. PubMed ID: 8084183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Nasalance patterns in esophageal speech.
    Colyar TC; Christensen JM
    J Commun Disord; 1980 Jan; 13(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 6986414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The phonological representation of [voice] in speech perception.
    Jongman A; Sereno JA; Raaijmakers M; Lahiri A
    Lang Speech; 1992; 35 ( Pt 1-2)():137-52. PubMed ID: 1287384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Temporal encoding of the voice onset time phonetic parameter by field potentials recorded directly from human auditory cortex.
    Steinschneider M; Volkov IO; Noh MD; Garell PC; Howard MA
    J Neurophysiol; 1999 Nov; 82(5):2346-57. PubMed ID: 10561410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.