106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9157269)
1. Using tissue texture surrounding calcification clusters to predict benign vs malignant outcomes.
Thiele DL; Kimme-Smith C; Johnson TD; McCombs M; Bassett LW
Med Phys; 1996 Apr; 23(4):549-55. PubMed ID: 9157269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifications in morphological and texture feature spaces.
Chan HP; Sahiner B; Lam KL; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM; Adler DD
Med Phys; 1998 Oct; 25(10):2007-19. PubMed ID: 9800710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computerized classification of malignant and benign microcalcifications on mammograms: texture analysis using an artificial neural network.
Chan HP; Sahiner B; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Lam KL; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM
Phys Med Biol; 1997 Mar; 42(3):549-67. PubMed ID: 9080535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast cancer diagnosis: analyzing texture of tissue surrounding microcalcifications.
Karahaliou AN; Boniatis IS; Skiadopoulos SG; Sakellaropoulos FN; Arikidis NS; Likaki EA; Panayiotakis GS; Costaridou LI
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2008 Nov; 12(6):731-8. PubMed ID: 19000952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms.
Ge J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2975-88. PubMed ID: 16964876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of breast masses in mammograms by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis.
Mudigonda NR; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1215-27. PubMed ID: 11811822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Real and simulated clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. ROC study of observer performance.
Lado MJ; Tahoces PG; Souto M; Méndez AJ; Vidal JJ
Med Phys; 1997 Sep; 24(9):1385-94. PubMed ID: 9304566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Texture analysis of tissue surrounding microcalcifications on mammograms for breast cancer diagnosis.
Karahaliou A; Skiadopoulos S; Boniatis I; Sakellaropoulos P; Likaki E; Panayiotakis G; Costaridou L
Br J Radiol; 2007 Aug; 80(956):648-56. PubMed ID: 17621604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Wavelet-based 3D reconstruction of microcalcification clusters from two mammographic views: new evidence that fractal tumors are malignant and Euclidean tumors are benign.
Batchelder KA; Tanenbaum AB; Albert S; Guimond L; Kestener P; Arneodo A; Khalil A
PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e107580. PubMed ID: 25222610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Segmentation of suspicious clustered microcalcifications in mammograms.
Gavrielides MA; Lo JY; Vargas-Voracek R; Floyd CE
Med Phys; 2000 Jan; 27(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 10659733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of single and clustered microcalcifications in mammograms using fractals models and neural networks.
Bocchi L; Coppini G; Nori J; Valli G
Med Eng Phys; 2004 May; 26(4):303-12. PubMed ID: 15121055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications: automated feature analysis and classification.
Jiang Y; Nishikawa RM; Wolverton DE; Metz CE; Giger ML; Schmidt RA; Vyborny CJ; Doi K
Radiology; 1996 Mar; 198(3):671-8. PubMed ID: 8628853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer-aided classification of mammographic masses and normal tissue: linear discriminant analysis in texture feature space.
Chan HP; Wei D; Helvie MA; Sahiner B; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM; Petrick N
Phys Med Biol; 1995 May; 40(5):857-76. PubMed ID: 7652012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of clustered microcalcifications by using a single numeric classifier extracted from mammographic digital images.
Buchbinder SS; Leichter IS; Bamberger PN; Novak B; Lederman R; Fields S; Behar DJ
Acad Radiol; 1998 Nov; 5(11):779-84. PubMed ID: 9809076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A simulation model of clustered breast microcalcifications.
Lefebvre F; Benali H; Gilles R; Di Paola R
Med Phys; 1994 Dec; 21(12):1865-74. PubMed ID: 7700193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automated analysis of mammographic densities.
Byng JW; Boyd NF; Fishell E; Jong RA; Yaffe MJ
Phys Med Biol; 1996 May; 41(5):909-23. PubMed ID: 8735257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated Detection and Classification of Microcalcification Clusters with Enhanced Preprocessing and Fractal Analysis.
Gowri V; Valluvan KR; Chamundeeswari VV
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Nov; 19(11):3093-3098. PubMed ID: 30486547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computerized evaluation of mammographic lesions: what diagnostic role does the shape of the individual microcalcifications play compared with the geometry of the cluster?
Leichter I; Lederman R; Buchbinder SS; Bamberger P; Novak B; Fields S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Mar; 182(3):705-12. PubMed ID: 14975973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An improved shift-invariant artificial neural network for computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
Zhang W; Doi K; Giger ML; Nishikawa RM; Schmidt RA
Med Phys; 1996 Apr; 23(4):595-601. PubMed ID: 8860907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Usefulness and limitations of the Japan Mammography Guidelines for the categorization of microcalcifications.
Uematsu T; Kasami M; Yuen S
Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 18288569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
