These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9157921)

  • 1. On accreditation of healthcare organizations. The accreditation decision: how is it made?
    Popovich M
    Home Care Provid; 1996; 1(2):107-9. PubMed ID: 9157921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 2008 accreditation decision rules for all programs.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2007 Aug; 27(8):3-9. PubMed ID: 17953314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. REVISED: Accreditation with Follow-up Survey and Preliminary Denial of Accreditation Decision Processes for Organizations Undergoing Resurvey.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2015 Mar; 35(3):1, 3, 5. PubMed ID: 26427283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Approved: remaining component to the accreditation decision methodology for 2009.
    Joint Commission
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2008 Dec; 28(12):3-4. PubMed ID: 19186441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accreditation Committee keeps tabs on important accreditation issues.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2002 Dec; 22(12):8-9. PubMed ID: 12506452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Corrections to "Joint Commission Accreditation Process" chapter in 2006 Comprehensive Manuals.
    Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 Nov; 25(11):5. PubMed ID: 16700334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Potential outcomes of type Is explained. Conditional accreditation twice in one accreditation cycle triggers PDA rule.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2002 Jun; 22(6):2-3. PubMed ID: 12094778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 2004 aggregation and decision rules approved for all programs.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2003 Aug; 23(8):1, 3-6. PubMed ID: 12920779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. QI professionals take harder look at alternatives to JCAHO accreditation.
    Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2003 Sep; 10(9):97-100. PubMed ID: 12966682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interim weighted decision rules not applied under certain circumstances.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Mar; 24(3):8. PubMed ID: 15035233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The postsurvey process.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2006 Apr; 26(4):8-10. PubMed ID: 16776421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Survey-weary hospitals drop JCAHO accreditation, others may follow.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1995 Feb; 20(2):25-8. PubMed ID: 10153179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Change in the process for organizations in which their survey reports meet a rule for conditional accreditation or preliminary denial of accreditation decision.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Sep; 24(9):7. PubMed ID: 15484653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ORYX. The next evolution in accreditation. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.
    Nurs Manage; 1997 May; 28(5):49-52, 54. PubMed ID: 9287797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discussion of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations' Agenda for Change.
    Fogg D
    AORN J; 1993 Jul; 58(1):127-30. PubMed ID: 8338356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. REVISED: Accreditation Decisions for Organizations Undergoing Initial Surveys.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2015 Mar; 35(3):7. PubMed ID: 26427287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The 2009 accreditation decision process.
    Joint Commission
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2009 Jul; 29(7):1, 4-5. PubMed ID: 19658280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Revised accreditation decision categories and definitions announced.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2000; 20(3):11. PubMed ID: 11066744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Should you consider ISO 9000?
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1998 Jan; 23(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10175807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correction to "The New Joint Commission Accreditation Process" chapter for hospitals.
    Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 May; 25(5):7. PubMed ID: 16032806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.