These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9158333)

  • 1. Effects of similarity, difficulty, and nontarget presentation on the time course of visual attention.
    Ward R; Duncan J; Shapiro K
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 May; 59(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 9158333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of temporal selection on spatial selection and distractor interference: an attentional blink study.
    Jiang Y; Chun MM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Jun; 27(3):664-79. PubMed ID: 11424653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation.
    Shapiro KL; Raymond JE; Arnell KM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):357-71. PubMed ID: 8189198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relationship between time of arrival of nontargets and their spatial location: evidence for asymmetries in visual attentional processing.
    Coyle K
    Perception; 1994; 23(7):849-56. PubMed ID: 7845774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vibrotactile masking: the role of response competition.
    Craig JC
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Nov; 57(8):1190-200. PubMed ID: 8539094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The neural processing fate of singleton target and nontarget stimuli.
    Akyürek EG; Dinkelbach A; Schubö A
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1307():115-33. PubMed ID: 19833112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The time course of presaccadic attention shifts.
    Deubel H
    Psychol Res; 2008 Nov; 72(6):630-40. PubMed ID: 18839208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is there feature-based attentional selection in visual search?
    Shih SI; Sperling G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Jun; 22(3):758-79. PubMed ID: 8666962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attention and nontarget effects in the location-cuing paradigm.
    Chastain G; Cheal M; Lyon D
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Feb; 58(2):300-9. PubMed ID: 8838172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tactile selective attention and temporal masking.
    Craig JC; Evans PM
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 May; 57(4):511-8. PubMed ID: 7596748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modulation of the attentional blink by differential resource allocation.
    Shore DI; Mclaughlin EN; Klein RM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Dec; 55(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 11768857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Close binding of identity and location in visual feature perception.
    Johnston JC; Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Nov; 16(4):843-56. PubMed ID: 2148596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beyond similarity: masking of the target is sufficient to cause the attentional blink.
    Grandison TD; Ghirardelli TG; Egeth HE
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Feb; 59(2):266-74. PubMed ID: 9055621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The attentional blink reflects retrieval competition among multiple rapid serial visual presentation items: tests of an interference model.
    Isaak MI; Shapiro KL; Martin J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Dec; 25(6):1774-92. PubMed ID: 10641317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporal limitations in the effective binding of attended target attributes in the mutual masking of visual objects.
    Hommuk K; Bachmann T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):648-60. PubMed ID: 19485683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stroop can occur without Garner interference: strategic and mandatory influences in multidimensional stimuli.
    Van Leeuwen C; Bakker L
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Apr; 57(3):379-92. PubMed ID: 7770328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Local and global minima in visual completion: effects of symmetry and orientation.
    Sekuler AB
    Perception; 1994; 23(5):529-45. PubMed ID: 7800468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence against response bias in temporal order tasks with attention manipulation by masked primes.
    Scharlau I
    Psychol Res; 2004 Aug; 68(4):224-36. PubMed ID: 12827351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets.
    Remington RW; Johnston JC; Yantis S
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Mar; 51(3):279-90. PubMed ID: 1561053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Limitations in attending to a feature value for overriding stimulus-driven interference.
    Kumada T
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Jan; 61(1):61-79. PubMed ID: 10070200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.