These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Complainant issues in research misconduct: the office of research integrity experience. Pascal CB Exp Biol Med (Maywood); 2006 Jul; 231(7):1264-70. PubMed ID: 16816133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry. Protti M J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Responding to scientific misconduct. Due process and prevention. Mishkin B JAMA; 1988 Oct; 260(13):1932-6. PubMed ID: 3418855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Science and law clash over fraud-case appeals. Hilts PJ N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():B10. PubMed ID: 11647010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Noted finding of science fraud is overturned by a federal panel. N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun; ():1, 20. PubMed ID: 11647108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime. Kline S J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The fraud case that evaporated. N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11647106 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The ethics of scientific research: an analysis of focus groups of scientists and institutional representatives. Wenger NS; Korenman SG; Berk R; Berry S J Investig Med; 1997 Aug; 45(6):371-80. PubMed ID: 9291693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Misconduct and fraud in research: social and legislative issues symposium of the Society of University Surgeons. Simmons RL; Polk HC; Williams B; Mavroudis C Surgery; 1991 Jul; 110(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 1866681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Honest research. Hillman H Sci Eng Ethics; 1995 Jan; 1(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 11657880 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Institutional policies for responding to allegations of research fraud. Greene PJ; Durch JS; Horwitz W; Hooper VS IRB; 1986; 8(4):1-7. PubMed ID: 11653742 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Scientific misconduct. How prevalent is fraud? That's a million-dollar question. Marshall E Science; 2000 Dec; 290(5497):1662-3. PubMed ID: 11186377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Science as a Matter of Honour: How Accused Scientists Deal with Scientific Fraud in Japan. Pellegrini PA Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Aug; 24(4):1297-1313. PubMed ID: 28653168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A view of misconduct in science. Racker E Nature; 1989 May; 339(6220):91-3. PubMed ID: 2716839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct. Resnik DB Account Res; 2003; 10(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 14577424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Overlooking ethics in the search for objectivity and misconduct in science. Reiser SJ Acad Med; 1993 Sep; 68(9 Suppl):S84-7. PubMed ID: 8396940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Integrity versus misconduct: learning the difference between right and wrong. Pritchard IA Acad Med; 1993 Sep; 68(9 Suppl):S67-71. PubMed ID: 8373494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]