34 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9158664)
1. Relationship of patient survival and chromosome anomalies detected in metaphase and/or interphase cells at diagnosis of myeloma.
Dewald GW; Therneau T; Larson D; Lee YK; Fink S; Smoley S; Paternoster S; Adeyinka A; Ketterling R; Van Dyke DL; Fonseca R; Kyle R
Blood; 2005 Nov; 106(10):3553-8. PubMed ID: 16030187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Normal karyotype in myelofibrosis: is prognostic integrity affected by the number of metaphases analyzed?
Nicolosi M; Mudireddy M; Gangat N; Pardanani A; Hanson CA; Ketterling RP; Tefferi A
Blood Cancer J; 2018 Jan; 8(1):8. PubMed ID: 29330482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Clonal cell lineage involvement in myelodysplastic syndromes studied by fluorescence in situ hybridization and morphology.
Bernell P; Jacobsson B; Nordgren A; Hast R
Leukemia; 1996 Apr; 10(4):662-8. PubMed ID: 8618444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interphase cytogenetics by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for characterization of monosomy-7-associated myeloid disorders.
Baurmann H; Cherif D; Berger R
Leukemia; 1993 Mar; 7(3):384-91. PubMed ID: 8445944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of monosomy 7 and trisomy 8 in myeloid neoplasia: a comparison of banding and fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Kibbelaar RE; Mulder JW; Dreef EJ; van Kamp H; Fibbe WE; Wessels JW; Beverstock GC; Haak HL; Kluin PM
Blood; 1993 Aug; 82(3):904-13. PubMed ID: 8338953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incidence and significance of cryptic chromosome aberrations detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization in acute myeloid leukemia with normal karyotype.
Cuneo A; Bigoni R; Cavazzini F; Bardi A; Roberti MG; Agostini P; Tammiso E; Ciccone N; Mancini M; Nanni M; De Cuia R; Divona M; La Starza R; Crescenzi B; Testoni N; Rege Cambrin G; Mecucci C; Lo Coco F; Saglio G; Castoldi G
Leukemia; 2002 Sep; 16(9):1745-51. PubMed ID: 12200689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interphase cytogenetics of hematological cancer: comparison of classical karyotyping and in situ hybridization using a panel of eleven chromosome specific DNA probes.
Poddighe PJ; Moesker O; Smeets D; Awwad BH; Ramaekers FC; Hopman AH
Cancer Res; 1991 Apr; 51(7):1959-67. PubMed ID: 2004382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The monosomy 7 clone in interphase and metaphase cell population: a combined chromosome and primed in situ labeling study.
Pedersen B; Koch J; Bendix Hansen K; Hindkjaer J; Lindbjerg Andersen C
Acta Haematol; 1997; 97(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 9158664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Childhood monosomy 7: epidemiology, biology, and mechanistic implications.
Luna-Fineman S; Shannon KM; Lange BJ
Blood; 1995 Apr; 85(8):1985-99. PubMed ID: 7718870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Tetrasomy 8 is associated with a major cellular proliferative advantage and a poor prognosis. two cases of myeloid hematologic disorders and review of the literature.
Yan J; Marceau D; Drouin R
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2001 Feb; 125(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 11297762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Two different classes of therapy-related and de-novo acute myeloid leukemia?
Pedersen-Bjergaard J; Philip P
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 1991 Aug; 55(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 1655239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acute leukemia with structural rearrangements of chromosome 3.
Horsman DE; Gascoyne RD; Barnett MJ
Leuk Lymphoma; 1995 Feb; 16(5-6):369-77. PubMed ID: 7787746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
