These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9159138)

  • 1. Safety in numbers: sophisticated vigilance by Allenby's gerbil.
    Rosenzweig ML; Abramsky Z; Subach A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1997 May; 94(11):5713-5. PubMed ID: 9159138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Complex state-dependent games between owls and gerbils.
    Berger-Tal O; Mukherjee S; Kotler BP; Brown JS
    Ecol Lett; 2010 Mar; 13(3):302-10. PubMed ID: 20455918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ninja owl; Gerbils over-anticipate an unexpected flying predator.
    Bleicher SS; Kotler BP; Embar K
    Behav Processes; 2020 Sep; 178():104161. PubMed ID: 32505484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does intraspecific competition among Allenby's gerbils lead to an Ideal Free Distribution across foraging patches?
    Makin DF; Kotler BP
    Behav Processes; 2019 Oct; 167():103922. PubMed ID: 31377380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. State of emergency: behavior of gerbils is affected by the hunger state of their predators.
    Berger-Tal O; Kotler BP
    Ecology; 2010 Feb; 91(2):593-600. PubMed ID: 20392023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Driven to distraction: detecting the hidden costs of flea parasitism through foraging behaviour in gerbils.
    Raveh A; Kotler BP; Abramsky Z; Krasnov BR
    Ecol Lett; 2011 Jan; 14(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 21070560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Moonlight avoidance in gerbils reveals a sophisticated interplay among time allocation, vigilance and state-dependent foraging.
    Kotler BP; Brown J; Mukherjee S; Berger-Tal O; Bouskila A
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 May; 277(1687):1469-74. PubMed ID: 20053649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Everybody loses: intraspecific competition induces tragedy of the commons in Allenby's gerbils.
    Berger-Tal O; Embar K; Kotler BP; Saltz D
    Ecology; 2015 Jan; 96(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 26236890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. To dare or not to dare? Risk management by owls in a predator-prey foraging game.
    Embar K; Raveh A; Burns D; Kotler BP
    Oecologia; 2014 Jul; 175(3):825-34. PubMed ID: 24810326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Enemy Within: How Does a Bacterium Inhibit the Foraging Aptitude and Risk Management Behavior of Allenby's Gerbils?
    Makin DF; Kotler BP; Brown JS; Garrido M; Menezes JFS
    Am Nat; 2020 Dec; 196(6):717-729. PubMed ID: 33211558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of barn owls (Tyto alba) on the activity and microhabitat selection of Gerbillus allenbyi and G. pyramidum.
    Abramsky Z; Strauss E; Subach A; Riechman A; Kotler BP
    Oecologia; 1996 Feb; 105(3):313-319. PubMed ID: 28307103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What do predators really want? The role of gerbil energetic state in determining prey choice by Barn Owls.
    Embar K; Mukherjee S; Kotler BP
    Ecology; 2014 Feb; 95(2):280-5. PubMed ID: 24669722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predator facilitation or interference: a game of vipers and owls.
    Embar K; Raveh A; Hoffmann I; Kotler BP
    Oecologia; 2014 Apr; 174(4):1301-9. PubMed ID: 24481981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intraguild mutualism.
    Crowley PH; Cox JJ
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2011 Dec; 26(12):627-33. PubMed ID: 21880393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predation risk in relation to brain size in alternative prey of pygmy owls varies depending on the abundance of main prey.
    Møller AP; Hongisto K; Korpimäki E
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0236155. PubMed ID: 32915780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A mathematical model of facultative mutualism with populations interacting in a food chain.
    Kumar R; Freedman HI
    Math Biosci; 1989 Dec; 97(2):235-61. PubMed ID: 2520212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A co-evolutionary model of mutualism from a commensal association on Lotka-Volterra dynamics.
    Sikder A; Roy AB
    Biosystems; 1994; 32(1):39-60. PubMed ID: 8018840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cascading effects of predation risk determine how marine predators become terrestrial prey on an oceanic island.
    Thomsen SK; Green DJ
    Ecology; 2016 Dec; 97(12):3530-3537. PubMed ID: 27912006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. From plants to birds: higher avian predation rates in trees responding to insect herbivory.
    Mäntylä E; Alessio GA; Blande JD; Heijari J; Holopainen JK; Laaksonen T; Piirtola P; Klemola T
    PLoS One; 2008 Jul; 3(7):e2832. PubMed ID: 18665271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Birds of prey as limiting factors of gamebird populations in Europe: a review.
    Valkama J; Korpimäki E; Arroyo B; Beja P; Bretagnolle V; Bro E; Kenward R; Mañosa S; Redpath SM; Thirgood S; Viñuela J
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2005 May; 80(2):171-203. PubMed ID: 15921048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.