These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9159591)

  • 1. A pilot study of the use of the analytic hierarchy process for the selection of surgery residents.
    Weingarten MS; Erlich F; Nydick RL; Liberatore MJ
    Acad Med; 1997 May; 72(5):400-2. PubMed ID: 9159591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Importance of the faculty interview during the resident application process.
    Brothers TE; Wetherholt S
    J Surg Educ; 2007; 64(6):378-85. PubMed ID: 18063273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Applicant Characteristics Associated With Selection for Ranking at Independent Surgery Residency Programs.
    Dort JM; Trickey AW; Kallies KJ; Joshi AR; Sidwell RA; Jarman BT
    J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(6):e123-9. PubMed ID: 26073713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of academic achievements and psychometric measures in the ranking process.
    Shebrain S; Arafeh M; Munene G; Shattuck C; Miller L; Lu S; Schutter D
    Am J Surg; 2019 Mar; 217(3):568-571. PubMed ID: 30266419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of two methods for ranking applicants for residency.
    Collins M; Curtis A; Artis K; Staib L; Bokhari J
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2010 Dec; 7(12):961-6. PubMed ID: 21129688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determining personal talents and behavioral styles of applicants to surgical training: a new look at an old problem, part I.
    Bell RM; Fann SA; Morrison JE; Lisk JR
    J Surg Educ; 2011; 68(6):534-41. PubMed ID: 22000541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of the interview in pediatric residency selection.
    Swanson WS; Harris MC; Master C; Gallagher PR; Mauro AE; Ludwig S
    Ambul Pediatr; 2005; 5(4):216-20. PubMed ID: 16026186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learning style preferences of surgical residency applicants.
    Kim RH; Gilbert T
    J Surg Res; 2015 Sep; 198(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 26070495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation of personality assessments with standard selection criteria for neurosurgical residency applicants.
    Lubelski D; Healy AT; Friedman A; Ferraris D; Benzel EC; Schlenk R
    J Neurosurg; 2016 Oct; 125(4):986-994. PubMed ID: 26848920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does Residency Selection Criteria Predict Performance in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency?
    Raman T; Alrabaa RG; Sood A; Maloof P; Benevenia J; Berberian W
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Apr; 474(4):908-14. PubMed ID: 25940336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The predictive value of application variables on the global rating of applicants to a general surgery residency program.
    Sharp C; Plank A; Dove J; Woll N; Hunsinger M; Morgan A; Blansfield J; Shabahang M
    J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(1):148-55. PubMed ID: 25091382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The assessment of emotional intelligence among candidates interviewing for general surgery residency.
    Lin DT; Kannappan A; Lau JN
    J Surg Educ; 2013; 70(4):514-21. PubMed ID: 23725940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A simulation-based selection process for trying to identify medical students who will become outstanding general surgery residents.
    AlJamal Y; Prabhakar N; Rivera M; McKenzie T; Stulak J; Heller S; Farley DR
    Am J Surg; 2020 Jul; 220(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 31735258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Applicant selection procedures in endodontic specialty programs in the United States: program director's perspective.
    Bell LT; Sukotjo C; Yuan JC; Johnson BR
    J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):797-804. PubMed ID: 24862706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does medical student membership in the gold humanism honor society influence selection for residency?
    Rosenthal S; Howard B; Schlussel YR; Lazarus CJ; Wong JG; Moutier C; Savoia M; Trooskin S; Wagoner N
    J Surg Educ; 2009; 66(6):308-13. PubMed ID: 20142126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pilot evaluation of the Computer-Based Assessment for Sampling Personal Characteristics test.
    Shipper ES; Mazer LM; Merrell SB; Lin DT; Lau JN; Melcher ML
    J Surg Res; 2017 Jul; 215():211-218. PubMed ID: 28688650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application submission date reflects applicant quality.
    Fuhrman GM; Dada S; Ehleben C
    J Surg Educ; 2008; 65(6):397-400. PubMed ID: 19059168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can Future Academic Surgeons be Identified in the Residency Ranking Process?
    Beninato T; Kleiman DA; Zarnegar R; Fahey TJ
    J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(5):788-92. PubMed ID: 27137665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Personal Statements in General Surgery: An Unrecognized Role in the Ranking Process.
    Naples R; French JC; Lipman JM; Prabhu AS; Aiello A; Park SK
    J Surg Educ; 2020; 77(6):e20-e27. PubMed ID: 32305336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The importance of basic science and clinical research as a selection criterion for general surgery residency programs.
    Melendez MM; Xu X; Sexton TR; Shapiro MJ; Mohan EP
    J Surg Educ; 2008; 65(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 18439541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.