156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9160441)
1. Mapping visual analogue scale health state valuations onto standard gamble and time trade-off values.
Dolan P; Sutton M
Soc Sci Med; 1997 May; 44(10):1519-30. PubMed ID: 9160441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Valuing health states: a comparison of methods.
Dolan P; Gudex C; Kind P; Williams A
J Health Econ; 1996 Apr; 15(2):209-31. PubMed ID: 10159110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality-of-life valuations of advanced breast cancer by New Zealand women.
Milne RJ; Heaton-Brown KH; Hansen P; Thomas D; Harvey V; Cubitt A
Pharmacoeconomics; 2006; 24(3):281-92. PubMed ID: 16519549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A multi-method approach to measuring health-state valuations.
Salomon JA; Murray CJ
Health Econ; 2004 Mar; 13(3):281-90. PubMed ID: 14981652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What is it going to be, TTO or SG? A direct test of the validity of health state valuation.
Lipman SA; Brouwer WBF; Attema AE
Health Econ; 2020 Nov; 29(11):1475-1481. PubMed ID: 32744408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Valuing the health state 'tinnitus': differences between patients and the general public.
Happich M; von Lengerke T
Hear Res; 2005 Sep; 207(1-2):50-8. PubMed ID: 15919164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Valuing health status using VAS and TTO: what lies behind the numbers?
Robinson A; Dolan P; Williams A
Soc Sci Med; 1997 Oct; 45(8):1289-97. PubMed ID: 9381241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility, comparability, and reliability of the standard gamble compared with the rating scale and time trade-off techniques in Korean population.
Kim SH; Lee SI; Jo MW
Qual Life Res; 2017 Dec; 26(12):3387-3397. PubMed ID: 28801862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating an EQ-5D value set for Malaysia using time trade-off and visual analogue scale methods.
Yusof FA; Goh A; Azmi S
Value Health; 2012; 15(1 Suppl):S85-90. PubMed ID: 22265073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Individual differences in the use of the response scale determine valuations of hypothetical health states: an empirical study.
Essink-Bot ML; Stuifbergen MC; Meerding WJ; Looman CW; Bonsel GJ;
BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Apr; 7():62. PubMed ID: 17466068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reconsidering the use of rankings in the valuation of health states: a model for estimating cardinal values from ordinal data.
Salomon JA
Popul Health Metr; 2003 Dec; 1(1):12. PubMed ID: 14687419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of different valuation methods for population health status measured by the EQ-5D in three European countries.
Bernert S; Fernández A; Haro JM; König HH; Alonso J; Vilagut G; Sevilla-Dedieu C; de Graaf R; Matschinger H; Heider D; Angermeyer MC;
Value Health; 2009; 12(5):750-8. PubMed ID: 19490564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What utility scores do mental health service users, healthcare professionals and members of the general public attribute to different health states? A co-produced mixed methods online survey.
Flood C; Barlow S; Simpson A; Burls A; Price A; Cartwright M; Brini S;
PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205223. PubMed ID: 30352071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sagittal craniosynostosis: a utility outcomes study.
Kuta V; McNeely PD; Walling S; Bezuhly M
J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2017 Aug; 20(2):113-118. PubMed ID: 28524791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Health State Utility Measures in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.
Noel CW; Lee DJ; Kong Q; Xu W; Simpson C; Brown D; Gilbert RW; Gullane PJ; Irish JC; Huang SH; O'Sullivan B; Goldstein DP; de Almeida JR
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Aug; 141(8):696-703. PubMed ID: 26204439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The health utility of mild and severe dysphonia.
DeVore EK; Shrime MG; Wittenberg E; Franco RA; Song PC; Naunheim MR
Laryngoscope; 2020 May; 130(5):1256-1262. PubMed ID: 31381164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of caregiver and parenting status on time trade-off and standard gamble utility scores for health state descriptions.
Matza LS; Boye KS; Feeny DH; Johnston JA; Bowman L; Jordan JB
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2014 Apr; 12():48. PubMed ID: 24716709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acceptability of computerized visual analog scale, time trade-off and standard gamble rating methods in patients and the public.
Lenert LA; Sturley AE
Proc AMIA Symp; 2001; ():364-8. PubMed ID: 11825211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Health state valuations of patients and the general public analytically compared: a meta-analytical comparison of patient and population health state utilities.
Peeters Y; Stiggelbout AM
Value Health; 2010; 13(2):306-9. PubMed ID: 19744288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. QALY weights for diabetic retinopathy--a comparison of health state valuations with HUI-3, EQ-5D, EQ-VAS, and TTO.
Heintz E; Wiréhn AB; Peebo BB; Rosenqvist U; Levin LÅ
Value Health; 2012 May; 15(3):475-84. PubMed ID: 22583458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
