These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9160441)

  • 1. Mapping visual analogue scale health state valuations onto standard gamble and time trade-off values.
    Dolan P; Sutton M
    Soc Sci Med; 1997 May; 44(10):1519-30. PubMed ID: 9160441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Valuing health states: a comparison of methods.
    Dolan P; Gudex C; Kind P; Williams A
    J Health Econ; 1996 Apr; 15(2):209-31. PubMed ID: 10159110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality-of-life valuations of advanced breast cancer by New Zealand women.
    Milne RJ; Heaton-Brown KH; Hansen P; Thomas D; Harvey V; Cubitt A
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2006; 24(3):281-92. PubMed ID: 16519549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A multi-method approach to measuring health-state valuations.
    Salomon JA; Murray CJ
    Health Econ; 2004 Mar; 13(3):281-90. PubMed ID: 14981652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What is it going to be, TTO or SG? A direct test of the validity of health state valuation.
    Lipman SA; Brouwer WBF; Attema AE
    Health Econ; 2020 Nov; 29(11):1475-1481. PubMed ID: 32744408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Valuing the health state 'tinnitus': differences between patients and the general public.
    Happich M; von Lengerke T
    Hear Res; 2005 Sep; 207(1-2):50-8. PubMed ID: 15919164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Valuing health status using VAS and TTO: what lies behind the numbers?
    Robinson A; Dolan P; Williams A
    Soc Sci Med; 1997 Oct; 45(8):1289-97. PubMed ID: 9381241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feasibility, comparability, and reliability of the standard gamble compared with the rating scale and time trade-off techniques in Korean population.
    Kim SH; Lee SI; Jo MW
    Qual Life Res; 2017 Dec; 26(12):3387-3397. PubMed ID: 28801862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating an EQ-5D value set for Malaysia using time trade-off and visual analogue scale methods.
    Yusof FA; Goh A; Azmi S
    Value Health; 2012; 15(1 Suppl):S85-90. PubMed ID: 22265073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Individual differences in the use of the response scale determine valuations of hypothetical health states: an empirical study.
    Essink-Bot ML; Stuifbergen MC; Meerding WJ; Looman CW; Bonsel GJ;
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Apr; 7():62. PubMed ID: 17466068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reconsidering the use of rankings in the valuation of health states: a model for estimating cardinal values from ordinal data.
    Salomon JA
    Popul Health Metr; 2003 Dec; 1(1):12. PubMed ID: 14687419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of different valuation methods for population health status measured by the EQ-5D in three European countries.
    Bernert S; Fernández A; Haro JM; König HH; Alonso J; Vilagut G; Sevilla-Dedieu C; de Graaf R; Matschinger H; Heider D; Angermeyer MC;
    Value Health; 2009; 12(5):750-8. PubMed ID: 19490564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What utility scores do mental health service users, healthcare professionals and members of the general public attribute to different health states? A co-produced mixed methods online survey.
    Flood C; Barlow S; Simpson A; Burls A; Price A; Cartwright M; Brini S;
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205223. PubMed ID: 30352071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sagittal craniosynostosis: a utility outcomes study.
    Kuta V; McNeely PD; Walling S; Bezuhly M
    J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2017 Aug; 20(2):113-118. PubMed ID: 28524791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Health State Utility Measures in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.
    Noel CW; Lee DJ; Kong Q; Xu W; Simpson C; Brown D; Gilbert RW; Gullane PJ; Irish JC; Huang SH; O'Sullivan B; Goldstein DP; de Almeida JR
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Aug; 141(8):696-703. PubMed ID: 26204439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The health utility of mild and severe dysphonia.
    DeVore EK; Shrime MG; Wittenberg E; Franco RA; Song PC; Naunheim MR
    Laryngoscope; 2020 May; 130(5):1256-1262. PubMed ID: 31381164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of caregiver and parenting status on time trade-off and standard gamble utility scores for health state descriptions.
    Matza LS; Boye KS; Feeny DH; Johnston JA; Bowman L; Jordan JB
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2014 Apr; 12():48. PubMed ID: 24716709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acceptability of computerized visual analog scale, time trade-off and standard gamble rating methods in patients and the public.
    Lenert LA; Sturley AE
    Proc AMIA Symp; 2001; ():364-8. PubMed ID: 11825211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Health state valuations of patients and the general public analytically compared: a meta-analytical comparison of patient and population health state utilities.
    Peeters Y; Stiggelbout AM
    Value Health; 2010; 13(2):306-9. PubMed ID: 19744288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. QALY weights for diabetic retinopathy--a comparison of health state valuations with HUI-3, EQ-5D, EQ-VAS, and TTO.
    Heintz E; Wiréhn AB; Peebo BB; Rosenqvist U; Levin LÅ
    Value Health; 2012 May; 15(3):475-84. PubMed ID: 22583458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.